Literature DB >> 25983595

Reliability of Three-Dimensional Linear Kinematics and Kinetics of Swimming Derived from Digitized Video at 25 and 50 Hz with 10 and 5 Frame Extensions to the 4(th) Order Butterworth Smoothing Window.

Ross H Sanders1, Tomohiro Gonjo2, Carla B McCabe3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the reliability of estimating three-dimensional (3D) linear kinematics and kinetics of a swimmer derived from digitized video and to assess the effect of framing rate and smoothing window size. A stroke cycle of two high-level front crawl swimmers and one high level backstroke swimmer was recorded by four underwater and two above water video cameras. One of the front crawl swimmers was recorded and digitized at 50 Hz with a window for smoothing by 4(th) order Butterworth digital filter extending 10 frames beyond the start and finish of the stroke cycle, while the other front crawl and backstroke swimmer were recorded and digitized at 25 Hz with the window extending five frames beyond the start and finish of the stroke cycle. Each camera view of the stroke cycle was digitized five times yielding five independent 3D data sets from which whole body centre of mass (CM) component velocities and accelerations were derived together with wrist and ankle linear velocities. Coefficients of reliability ranging from r = 0.942 to r = 0.999 indicated that both methods are sufficiently reliable to identify real differences in net force production during the pulls of the right and left hands. Reliability of digitizing was better for front crawl when digitizing at 50Hz with 10 frames extension than at 25 Hz with 5 frames extension (p < 0.01) and better for backstroke than front crawl (p < 0.01). However, despite the extension and reflection of data, errors were larger in the first 15% of the stroke cycle than the period between 15 and 85% of the stroke cycle for CM velocity and acceleration and for foot speed (p < 0.01). Key pointsAn inverse dynamics based on 3D position data digitized from multiple camera views above and below the water surface is sufficiently reliable to yield insights regarding force production in swimming additional to those of other approaches.The ability to link the force profiles to swimming actions and technique is enhanced by having additional data such as wrist and foot velocities that can be obtained readily from the digitized data.Sampling at 25 Hz with at least 5 samples before and after the period of interest is required for reliable data when using a 4th Order Butterworth Digital Filter.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Butterworth filter; Inverse dynamics; asymmetry; reliability; swimming

Year:  2015        PMID: 25983595      PMCID: PMC4424475     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  16 in total

1.  Technique for the evaluation of derivatives from noisy biomechanical displacement data using a model-based bandwidth-selection procedure.

Authors:  M D'Amico; G Ferrigno
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Kinematic differences between front crawl sprint and distance swimmers at sprint pace.

Authors:  Carla B McCabe; Stelios Psycharakis; Ross Sanders
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.337

3.  Validity of the use of a fixed point for intracycle velocity calculations in swimming.

Authors:  Stelios G Psycharakis; Ross H Sanders
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 4.319

4.  Shoulder and hip roll changes during 200-m front crawl swimming.

Authors:  Stelios G Psycharakis; Ross H Sanders
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Endpoint error in smoothing and differentiating raw kinematic data: an evaluation of four popular methods.

Authors:  P F Vint; R N Hinrichs
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  Physiological response to water immersion: a method for sport recovery?

Authors:  Ian M Wilcock; John B Cronin; Wayne A Hing
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Measurement of active drag during crawl arm stroke swimming.

Authors:  A P Hollander; G De Groot; G J van Ingen Schenau; H M Toussaint; H De Best; W Peeters; A Meulemans; A W Schreurs
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.337

8.  Effect of passive and active recovery on the resynthesis of muscle glycogen.

Authors:  D Choi; K J Cole; B H Goodpaster; W J Fink; D L Costill
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Estimation of the biomechanical properties of three body types using a photogrammetric method.

Authors:  R K Jensen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Upper extremity kinematics and body roll during preferred-side breathing and breath-holding front crawl swimming.

Authors:  C J Payton; R M Bartlett; V Baltzopoulos; R Coombs
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.337

View more
  2 in total

1.  Reliability of Three-Dimensional Angular Kinematics and Kinetics of Swimming Derived from Digitized Video.

Authors:  Ross H Sanders; Tomohiro Gonjo; Carla B McCabe
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Body roll amplitude and timing in backstroke swimming and their differences from front crawl at the same swimming intensities.

Authors:  Tomohiro Gonjo; Ricardo J Fernandes; João Paulo Vilas-Boas; Ross Sanders
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.