| Literature DB >> 25983043 |
Veronika Bachanova1, Linda J Burns2, Kwang Woo Ahn3, Ginna G Laport4, Görgün Akpek5, Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja6, Taiga Nishihori6, Edward Agura7, Philippe Armand8, Samantha M Jaglowski9, Mitchell S Cairo10, Amanda F Cashen11, Jonathon B Cohen12, Anita D'Souza13, César O Freytes14, Robert Peter Gale15, Siddhartha Ganguly16, Nilanjan Ghosh17, Leona A Holmberg18, David J Inwards19, Abraham S Kanate20, Hillard M Lazarus21, Adriana K Malone22, Reinhold Munker23, Alberto Mussetti24, Maxim Norkin25, Tim D Prestidge26, Jacob M Rowe27, Prakash Satwani28, Tanya Siddiqi29, Patrick J Stiff30, Basem M William21, Baldeep Wirk31, David G Maloney18, Sonali M Smith32, Anna M Sureda33, Jeanette Carreras13, Mehdi Hamadani13.
Abstract
Assessment with (18)F-fluorodeoxy glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) before hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for lymphoma may be prognostic for outcomes. Patients with chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) undergoing allogeneic HCT reported to the Center of International Blood and Marrow Transplantation Registry between 2007 and 2012 were included. Pre-HCT PET status (positive versus negative) was determined by the reporting transplantation centers. We analyzed 336 patients; median age was 55 years and 60% were males. Follicular lymphoma (n = 104) was more common than large cell (n = 85), mantle cell (n = 69), and mature natural killer or T cell lymphoma (n = 78); two thirds of the cohort received reduced-intensity conditioning; one half had unrelated donor grafts. Patients underwent PET scanning a median of 1 month (range, .07 to 2.83 months) before HCT; 159 were PET positive and 177 were PET negative. At 3 years, relapse/progression, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in PET-positive versus PET-negative groups were 40% versus 26%; P = .007; 43% versus 47%; P = .47; and 58% versus 60%; P = .73, respectively. On multivariate analysis, a positive pretransplantation PET was associated with an increased risk of relapse/progression (risk ratio [RR], 1.86; P = .001) but was not associated with increased mortality (RR, 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI], .96 to 1.7; P = .08), therapy failure (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, .95 to 1.84; P = .10), or nonrelapse mortality (RR, .75; 95% CI, .48 to 1.18; P = .22). PET status conferred no influence on graft-versus-host disease. A positive PET scan before HCT is associated with increased relapse risk but should not be interpreted as a barrier to a successful allograft. PET status does not appear to predict survival after allogeneic HCT for NHL.Entities:
Keywords: Allogeneic transplantation; Non-Hodgkin lymphoma; Positron emission tomography
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25983043 PMCID: PMC4558181 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.05.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ISSN: 1083-8791 Impact factor: 5.742