Literature DB >> 25982584

Continence Index: a new screening questionnaire to predict the probability of future incontinence in older women in the community.

Ananias C Diokno1, Theophilus Ogunyemi, Mohammad-Reza Siadat, Suzan Arslanturk, Kim A Killinger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a chronic, costly condition that impairs quality of life. To identify older women most at risk, the Medical Epidemiologic and Social Aspects of Aging (MESA) datasets were mined to create a set of questions that can reliably predict future UI.
METHODS: MESA data were collected during four household interviews at approximately 1 year intervals. Factors associated with becoming incontinent at the second interview (HH2) were identified using logistic regression (construction datasets). Based on p values and odds ratios, eight potential predictive factors with their 256 combinations and corresponding prediction probabilities formed the Continence Index. Its predictive and discriminatory capability was tested against the same cohort's outcome in the fourth survey (HH4 validation datasets). Sensitivity analysis, area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, predicted probabilities and confidence intervals were used to statistically validate the Continence Index.
RESULTS: Body mass index, sneezing, post-partum UI, urinary frequency, mild UI, belief of developing UI in the future, difficulty stopping urinary stream and remembering names emerged as the strongest predictors of UI. The confidence intervals for prediction probabilities strongly agreed between construction and validation datasets. Calculated sensitivity, specificity, false-positive and false-negative values revealed that the areas under the ROCs (0.802 and 0.799) for the construction and validation datasets, respectively, indicated good discriminatory capabilities of the index as a predictor.
CONCLUSION: The Continence Index will help identify older women most at risk of UI in order to apply targeted prevention strategies in women that are most likely to benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25982584      PMCID: PMC4485523          DOI: 10.1007/s11255-015-1006-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  19 in total

1.  Urodynamic tests for female geriatric urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A C Diokno; D P Normolle; M B Brown; A R Herzog
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Behavioral modification: group teaching outcomes.

Authors:  C M Sampselle; J M Miller; A R Herzog; A C Diokno
Journal:  Urol Nurs       Date:  1996-06

3.  Urinary incontinence in the elderly.

Authors:  T J Wells; A C Diokno
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.420

4.  Medical correlates of urinary incontinence in the elderly.

Authors:  A C Diokno; B M Brock; A R Herzog; J Bromberg
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Harvard report on cancer prevention volume 4: Harvard Cancer Risk Index. Risk Index Working Group, Harvard Center for Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  G A Colditz; K A Atwood; K Emmons; R R Monson; W C Willett; D Trichopoulos; D J Hunter
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Urinary incontinence and psychological distress among older adults.

Authors:  A R Herzog; N H Fultz; B M Brock; M B Brown; A C Diokno
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1988-06

7.  Methods used to manage urinary incontinence by older adults in the community.

Authors:  A R Herzog; N H Fultz; D P Normolle; B M Brock; A C Diokno
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Urinary incontinence as a risk factor for mortality.

Authors:  A R Herzog; A C Diokno; M B Brown; N H Fultz; N E Goldstein
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 9.  Prevalence of urinary incontinence and associated risk factors in nursing home residents: a systematic review.

Authors:  May P W Offermans; Monique F M T Du Moulin; Jan P H Hamers; Theo Dassen; Ruud J G Halfens
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.696

10.  Novel application of statistical methods to identify new urinary incontinence risk factors.

Authors:  Theophilus O Ogunyemi; Mohammad-Reza Siadat; Suzan Arslanturk; Kim A Killinger; Ananias C Diokno
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-10-31
View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of Group-Administered Behavioral Treatment on Urinary Incontinence in Older Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ananias C Diokno; Diane K Newman; Lisa K Low; Tomas L Griebling; Michael E Maddens; Patricia S Goode; Trivellore E Raghunathan; Leslee L Subak; Carolyn M Sampselle; Judith A Boura; Ann E Robinson; Donna McIntyre; Kathryn L Burgio
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Effect of Age, Educational Status, Parity and BMI on Development of Urinary Incontinence - a Cross Sectional Study in Saudi Population.

Authors:  Zaheera Saadia
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2015-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.