Literature DB >> 25982304

The role of the concept of biologically effective dose (BED) in treatment planning in radiosurgery.

William T Millar1, John W Hopewell2, Ian Paddick3, Christer Lindquist3, Håkan Nordströn4, Pär Lidberg4, Jonas Gårding4.   

Abstract

Radiosurgery (RS) treatment times vary, even for the same prescription dose, due to variations in the collimator size, the number of iso-centres/beams/arcs used and the time gap between each of these exposures. The biologically effective dose (BED) concept, incorporating fast and slow components of repair, was used to show the likely influence of these variables for Gamma Knife patients with Vestibular Schwannomas. Two patients plans were selected, treated with the Model B Gamma Knife, these representing the widest range of treatment variables; iso-centre numbers 3 and 13, overall treatment times 25.4 and 129.6 min, prescription dose 14 Gy. These were compared with 3 cases treated with the Perfexion(®) Gamma Knife. The iso-centre number varied between 11 and 18, treatment time 35.7 - 74.4 min, prescription dose 13 Gy. In the longer Model B Gamma Knife treatment plan the 14 Gy iso-dose was best matched by the 58 Gy2.47 iso-BED line, although higher and lower BED values were associated with regions on the prescription iso-dose. The equivalent value for the shorter treatment was 85 Gy2.47. BED volume histograms showed that a BED of 85 Gy2.47 only covered ∼65% of the target in the plan with the longer overall treatment time. The corresponding BED values for the 3 cases, treated with the Perfexion(®) Gamma Knife, were 59.5, 68.5 and 71.5 Gy2.47. In conclusion BED calculations, taking account of the repair of sublethal damage, may indicate the importance of reporting overall time to reflect the biological effectiveness of the total physical dose applied.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological effective dose; Radiosurgery; Treatment planning

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25982304     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  9 in total

1.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for orbital cavernous venous malformation: a single center's experience for 15 years.

Authors:  Won Jae Lee; Kyung-Rae Cho; Jung-Won Choi; Doo-Sik Kong; Ho Jun Seol; Do-Hyun Nam; Yoon-Duck Kim; Kyung In Woo; Jung-Il Lee
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Quantifying the effects of positional uncertainties and estimating margins for Gamma-Knife® fractionated radiosurgery of large brain metastases.

Authors:  Béatrice Reiner; Peter Bownes; David L Buckley; David I Thwaites
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2017

3.  Modelling the influence of treatment time on the biological effectiveness of single radiosurgery treatments: derivation of "protective" dose modification factors.

Authors:  Bleddyn Jones; John W Hopewell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  The impact of unscheduled gaps and iso-centre sequencing on the biologically effective dose in Gamma Knife radiosurgery.

Authors:  Thomas Klinge; Marc Modat; Jamie R McClelland; Alexis Dimitriadis; Ian Paddick; John W Hopewell; Lee Walton; Jeremy Rowe; Neil Kitchen; Sébastien Ourselin
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2021

5.  A Single-Center Treatment Experience of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Optic Pathway Glioma.

Authors:  Youlin Ge; Zhiyuan Zhang; Yanhe Li; Yiguang Lin; Yongqing Zong; Dong Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.246

6.  Evaluation of a New Inverse, Globally Convex Treatment Planning System Algorithm for Gamma Knife Radiation Surgery Within a Prospective Trial: Advantages and Disadvantages in Practical Application.

Authors:  Feline Heinzelmann; Moritz Budde; Irenäus A Adamietz; Kevin Kröninger; Jan P Boström
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-06-29

7.  The Impact of Insulin-Like Growth Factor Index and Biologically Effective Dose on Outcomes After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Acromegaly: Cohort Study.

Authors:  Christopher S Graffeo; Diane Donegan; Dana Erickson; Paul D Brown; Avital Perry; Michael J Link; William F Young; Bruce E Pollock
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  IntuitivePlan inverse planning performance evaluation for Gamma Knife radiosurgery of AVMs.

Authors:  Ian Paddick; Diana Grishchuk; Alexis Dimitriadis
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Radionecrosis and cellular changes in small volume stereotactic brain radiosurgery in a porcine model.

Authors:  Hamed Zaer; Andreas Nørgaard Glud; Bret M Schneider; Slávka Lukacova; Kim Vang Hansen; John R Adler; Morten Høyer; Morten Bjørn Jensen; Rune Hansen; Lone Hoffmann; Esben Schjødt Worm; Jens Chr Hedemann Sørensen; Dariusz Orlowski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.