Literature DB >> 25981691

Posture Influence on the Pendulum Test of Spasticity in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury.

Eliza Regina Ferreira Braga Machado de Azevedo1, Renata Manzano Maria1, Karina Cristina Alonso1, Alberto Cliquet1,2.   

Abstract

The study aims to investigate the influence of different postures on spasticity results by pendulum test in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). The setting was at the University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil. Five individuals with SCI and five individuals in the control group were included. All individuals went through the pendulum test in three different positions: supine, semi-supine at an angle of 30°, and sitting up at an angle of 60°. An electrogoniometer was attached to the right leg for measurement of knee joint angles. All situations were performed five times. Blood pressure was monitored during tests. Relaxation index (RI), normalized relaxation index (RIn), test duration in seconds, initial flexion angle, and resting angle were analyzed at three different positions. Results were compared between different positions, and statistically no differences were found. In individuals with SCI, RI (1.83 ± 0.2), RIn (1.14 ± 0.13), and test duration values (13.95 ± 4.14), in sitting up position, were similar to the control group results. In sitting up position, patients showed spasticity reduction. However, the other two postures produce pain and increase blood pressure in patients with tetraplegia. Therefore, these postures should be avoided in patients with lesions above T6, due to possible autonomic dysreflexia symptoms.
Copyright © 2015 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pendulum test; Posture; Spasticity; Spinal cord injury

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25981691     DOI: 10.1111/aor.12500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of Single-Session Dose Response Effects of Whole Body Vibration on Spasticity and Walking Speed in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Stephen Estes; Jennifer A Iddings; Somu Ray; Neva J Kirk-Sanchez; Edelle C Field-Fote
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Residual descending motor pathways influence spasticity after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sina Sangari; Henrik Lundell; Steven Kirshblum; Monica A Perez
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  Imbalanced Corticospinal and Reticulospinal Contributions to Spasticity in Humans with Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Sina Sangari; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Prevalence of spasticity in humans with spinal cord injury with different injury severity.

Authors:  Sina Sangari; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.974

Review 5.  ORTHOPEDIC RELATED COMORBIDITIES IN SPINAL CORD-INJURED INDIVIDUALS.

Authors:  Rafaella Camilo de Oliveira; Laura Bellintani de Freitas; Roberta Rocha Gomes; Alberto Cliquet
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.513

6.  Vibration attenuates spasm-like activity in humans with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Bradley A DeForest; Jorge Bohorquez; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Predictive value of the pendulum test for assessing knee extensor spasticity.

Authors:  Alyssa Whelan; Andrew Sexton; Melony Jones; Colleen O'Connell; Chris A McGibbon
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Soleus H-Reflex Change in Poststroke Spasticity: Modulation due to Body Position.

Authors:  Wenting Qin; Anjing Zhang; Mingzhen Yang; Chan Chen; Lijun Zhen; Hong Yang; Lingjing Jin; Fang Li
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.599

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.