Literature DB >> 25980746

Non-surgical complications after laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer - A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

A H W Schiphorst1, N M Verweij2, A Pronk2, I H M Borel Rinkes3, M E Hamaker4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac and pulmonary complications account for a large part of postoperative mortality, especially in the growing number of elderly patients. This review studies the effect of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer on short term non-surgical morbidity.
METHODS: A literature search was conducted to identify randomised trials on laparoscopic compared to open surgery for colorectal cancer with reported cardiac or pulmonary complications.
RESULTS: The search retrieved 3302 articles; 18 studies were included with a total of 6153 patients. Reported median or mean age varied from 56 years to 72 years. The percentage of included patients with ASA-scores ≥ 3 ranged from 7% to 38%. Morbidity was poorly defined. Overall reported incidence of postoperative cardiac complications was low for both laparoscopic and open colorectal resection (median 2%). There was a trend towards fewer cardiac complications following laparoscopic surgery (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.41-1.06, p = 0.08), and this effect was most marked for laparoscopic colectomy (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.71, p = 0.007). Incidence of pulmonary complications ranged from 0 to 11% and no benefit was found for laparoscopic surgery, although a possible trend was seen in favour of laparoscopic colectomy (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.53-1.13, p = 0.19). Overall morbidity rates varied from 11% to 69% with a median of 33%.
CONCLUSION: Although morbidity was poorly defined, for laparoscopic colectomies, significantly less cardiac complications occurred compared with open surgery and a trend towards less pulmonary complications was observed. Subgroup analysis from two RCTs suggests that elderly patients benefit most from a laparoscopic approach based on overall morbidity rates.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse events; Cardiopulmonary morbidity; Colectomy; Colorectal cancer; Complications; Laparoscopy; Non-surgical complications

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25980746     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  19 in total

1.  Barriers to laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: a national analysis.

Authors:  Alexander T Hawkins; Molly M Ford; M Benjamin Hopkins; Roberta L Muldoon; Jonathan P Wanderer; Alexander A Parikh; Timothy M Geiger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: how can we improve outcome?

Authors:  Henning Mothes; Astrid Bauschke; Silke Schuele; Ekkehard Eigendorff; Annelore Altendorf-Hofmann; Utz Settmacher
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in obese patients: a case-matched series.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Harr; Samuel Luka; Aman Kankaria; Yen-Yi Juo; Samir Agarwal; Vincent Obias
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopy may decrease morbidity and length of stay after elective colon cancer resection, especially in frail patients: results from an observational real-life study.

Authors:  Carlos Cerdán Santacruz; Matteo Frasson; Blas Flor-Lorente; José Luis Ramos Rodríguez; Marta Trallero Anoro; Mónica Millán Scheiding; Olga Maseda Díaz; Paula Dujovne Lindenbaum; Andrés Monzón Abad; Eduardo García-Granero Ximenez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The effect of obesity on laparoscopic and robotic-assisted colorectal surgery outcomes: an ACS-NSQIP database analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Harr; Ivy N Haskins; Richard L Amdur; Samir Agarwal; Vincent Obias
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-09-12

6.  Predicting primary postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mohamed A Abd El Aziz; William R Perry; Fabian Grass; Kellie L Mathis; David W Larson; Jay Mandrekar; Kevin T Behm
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-10-01

7.  Incisional and port-site hernias following robotic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Harr; Yen-Yi Juo; Samuel Luka; Samir Agarwal; Fred Brody; Vincent Obias
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The impact of retractor SPONGE-assisted laparoscopic surgery on duration of hospital stay and postoperative complications in patients with colorectal cancer (SPONGE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alice M Couwenberg; Maarten J P Burbach; Anke B Smits; Marco Van Vulpen; Wilhemina M U Van Grevenstein; Peter G Noordzij; Helena M Verkooijen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Right hemicolectomy: a network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic-assisted, total laparoscopic, and robotic approach.

Authors:  Emanuele Rausa; Michael Eamon Kelly; Emanuele Asti; Alberto Aiolfi; Gianluca Bonitta; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis for cancer: a prospective comparison between robotics and laparoscopy.

Authors:  Nadia Sorgato; Enzo Mammano; Tania Contardo; Fabrizio Vittadello; Giacomo Sarzo; Emilio Morpurgo
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.