Literature DB >> 25980019

Detecting unplanned care from clinician notes in electronic health records.

Suzanne Tamang1, Manali I Patel2, Douglas W Blayney2, Julie Kuznetsov2, Samuel G Finlayson2, Yohan Vetteth2, Nigam Shah2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Reduction in unplanned episodes of care, such as emergency department visits and unplanned hospitalizations, are important quality outcome measures. However, many events are only documented in free-text clinician notes and are labor intensive to detect by manual medical record review.
METHODS: We studied 308,096 free-text machine-readable documents linked to individual entries in our electronic health records, representing care for patients with breast, GI, or thoracic cancer, whose treatment was initiated at one academic medical center, Stanford Health Care (SHC). Using a clinical text-mining tool, we detected unplanned episodes documented in clinician notes (for non-SHC visits) or in coded encounter data for SHC-delivered care and the most frequent symptoms documented in emergency department (ED) notes.
RESULTS: Combined reporting increased the identification of patients with one or more unplanned care visits by 32% (15% using coded data; 20% using all the data) among patients with 3 months of follow-up and by 21% (23% using coded data; 28% using all the data) among those with 1 year of follow-up. Based on the textual analysis of SHC ED notes, pain (75%), followed by nausea (54%), vomiting (47%), infection (36%), fever (28%), and anemia (27%), were the most frequent symptoms mentioned. Pain, nausea, and vomiting co-occur in 35% of all ED encounter notes.
CONCLUSION: The text-mining methods we describe can be applied to automatically review free-text clinician notes to detect unplanned episodes of care mentioned in these notes. These methods have broad application for quality improvement efforts in which events of interest occur outside of a network that allows for patient data sharing.
Copyright © 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25980019      PMCID: PMC4438112          DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2014.002741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  27 in total

1.  Developing a natural language processing application for measuring the quality of colonoscopy procedures.

Authors:  Henk Harkema; Wendy W Chapman; Melissa Saul; Evan S Dellon; Robert E Schoen; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Why do patients with cancer visit the emergency department near the end of life?

Authors:  Lisa Barbera; Carole Taylor; Deborah Dudgeon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  STRIDE--An integrated standards-based translational research informatics platform.

Authors:  Henry J Lowe; Todd A Ferris; Penni M Hernandez; Susan C Weber
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2009-11-14

4.  Automated identification of postoperative complications within an electronic medical record using natural language processing.

Authors:  Harvey J Murff; Fern FitzHenry; Michael E Matheny; Nancy Gentry; Kristen L Kotter; Kimberly Crimin; Robert S Dittus; Amy K Rosen; Peter L Elkin; Steven H Brown; Theodore Speroff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Many emergency department visits could be managed at urgent care centers and retail clinics.

Authors:  Robin M Weinick; Rachel M Burns; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Natural language processing improves identification of colorectal cancer testing in the electronic medical record.

Authors:  Joshua C Denny; Neesha N Choma; Josh F Peterson; Randolph A Miller; Lisa Bastarache; Ming Li; Neeraja B Peterson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  ConText: an algorithm for determining negation, experiencer, and temporal status from clinical reports.

Authors:  Henk Harkema; John N Dowling; Tyler Thornblade; Wendy W Chapman
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2009-05-10       Impact factor: 6.317

8.  Nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer: the Cleveland Clinic protocol.

Authors:  Mona Gupta; Mellar Davis; Susan LeGrand; Declan Walsh; Ruth Lagman
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2013-03

9.  Why do cancer patients die in the emergency department?: an analysis of 283 deaths in NC EDs.

Authors:  Ashley Leak; Deborah K Mayer; Annah Wyss; Debbie Travers; Anna Waller
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.500

10.  Why do patients with cancer visit emergency departments? Results of a 2008 population study in North Carolina.

Authors:  Deborah K Mayer; Debbie Travers; Annah Wyss; Ashley Leak; Anna Waller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  12 in total

1.  Natural language processing of symptoms documented in free-text narratives of electronic health records: a systematic review.

Authors:  Theresa A Koleck; Caitlin Dreisbach; Philip E Bourne; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Identification of Uncontrolled Symptoms in Cancer Patients Using Natural Language Processing.

Authors:  Lisa DiMartino; Thomas Miano; Kathryn Wessell; Buck Bohac; Laura C Hanson
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Deep Learning for Cancer Symptoms Monitoring on the Basis of Electronic Health Record Unstructured Clinical Notes.

Authors:  Charlotta Lindvall; Chih-Ying Deng; Nicole D Agaronnik; Anne Kwok; Soujanya Samineni; Renato Umeton; Warren Mackie-Jenkins; Kenneth L Kehl; James A Tulsky; Andrea C Enzinger
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2022-06

Review 4.  Leveraging the electronic health record to improve quality and safety in rheumatology.

Authors:  Gabriela Schmajuk; Jinoos Yazdany
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 5.  Clinical information extraction applications: A literature review.

Authors:  Yanshan Wang; Liwei Wang; Majid Rastegar-Mojarad; Sungrim Moon; Feichen Shen; Naveed Afzal; Sijia Liu; Yuqun Zeng; Saeed Mehrabi; Sunghwan Sohn; Hongfang Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 6.  Using Electronic Health Records for Population Health Research: A Review of Methods and Applications.

Authors:  Joan A Casey; Brian S Schwartz; Walter F Stewart; Nancy E Adler
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 21.981

7.  Benchmark Method for Cost Computations Across Health Care Systems: Cost of Care per Patient per Day in Breast Cancer Care.

Authors:  Douglas W Blayney; Tina Seto; Nhat Hoang; Craig Lindquist; Allison W Kurian
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-03-01

8.  Hospitalizations and length of stay of cancer patients: A cohort study in the Brazilian Public Health System.

Authors:  Flávia Feliciana Silva; Gisele Macedo da Silva Bonfante; Ilka Afonso Reis; Hugo André da Rocha; Agner Pereira Lana; Mariangela Leal Cherchiglia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  New Paradigms for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research in Electronic Medical Records: An Example of Detecting Urinary Incontinence Following Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Suzanne Tamang; Douglas Blayney; Jim Brooks; Nigam Shah
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2016-05-12

10.  Comparing high-dimensional confounder control methods for rapid cohort studies from electronic health records.

Authors:  Yen Sia Low; Blanca Gallego; Nigam Haresh Shah
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 1.744

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.