Literature DB >> 17709169

Decision-making about PSA testing and prostate biopsies: a qualitative study embedded in a primary care randomised trial.

Kerry N L Avery1, Jane M Blazeby, J Athene Lane, David E Neal, Freddie C Hamdy, Jenny L Donovan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The overall aim was to increase understanding of men's decision-making about prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and subsequent biopsy.
METHODS: This qualitative interview study was nested within the primary care-based Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) trial in nine United Kingdom areas (ISRCTN number: 20141297). Fifty-eight men aged 50-69 yr (mean: 62 yr), accepting (n=14) or not responding (n=7) to invitations for PSA testing and accepting (n=24) or refusing (n=13) prostate biopsy were interviewed.
RESULTS: In this study, men accepting PSA testing and biopsy reported positively on their experiences, regardless of the final outcome. PSA testing was considered routine and biopsy acceptable to most men. Men both responding and not responding to PSA testing often perceived themselves to be at low risk for prostate cancer. Men refusing biopsy also tended to perceive themselves to be at low risk and many were anxious about the test itself. Misunderstandings about the relationship between urinary symptoms and risk of prostate cancer were identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Most men found PSA testing and biopsy acceptable, but perceptions of risk were not always accurate and the provision of more tailored information may help facilitate informed decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17709169     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.07.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  20 in total

1.  The absence of voiding symptoms in men with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration of ≥3.0 ng/mL is an independent risk factor for prostate cancer: results from the Gothenburg Randomized Screening Trial.

Authors:  Maria Frånlund; Sigrid Carlsson; Johan Stranne; Gunnar Aus; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Experiences of Uncertainty in Men With an Elevated PSA.

Authors:  Caitlin Biddle; Alicia Brasel; Willie Underwood; Heather Orom
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-06-23

3.  Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening rates and factors associated with screening in Eastern Canadian men: Findings from cross-sectional survey data.

Authors:  Devan Tchir; Marwa Farag; Michael Szafron
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  A polymorphism in the glucokinase gene that raises plasma fasting glucose, rs1799884, is associated with diabetes mellitus and prostate cancer: findings from a population-based, case-control study (the ProtecT study).

Authors:  Ali S Murad; George Davey Smith; Sarah J Lewis; Angela Cox; Jenny L Donovan; David E Neal; Freddie C Hamdy; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet       Date:  2010-04-01

Review 5.  PSA-based prostate cancer screening: the role of active surveillance and informed and shared decision making.

Authors:  Lionne D F Venderbos; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Impact of prostate cancer testing: an evaluation of the emotional consequences of a negative biopsy result.

Authors:  R C Macefield; C Metcalfe; J A Lane; J L Donovan; K N L Avery; J M Blazeby; L Down; D E Neal; F C Hamdy; K Vedhara
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Associations between an obesity related genetic variant (FTO rs9939609) and prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Sarah J Lewis; Ali Murad; Lina Chen; George Davey Smith; Jenny Donovan; Tom Palmer; Freddie Hamdy; David Neal; J Athene Lane; Michael Davis; Angela Cox; Richard M Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy in PSA-detected clinically localised prostate cancer: the ProtecT three-arm RCT.

Authors:  Freddie C Hamdy; Jenny L Donovan; J Athene Lane; Malcolm Mason; Chris Metcalfe; Peter Holding; Julia Wade; Sian Noble; Kirsty Garfield; Grace Young; Michael Davis; Tim J Peters; Emma L Turner; Richard M Martin; Jon Oxley; Mary Robinson; John Staffurth; Eleanor Walsh; Jane Blazeby; Richard Bryant; Prasad Bollina; James Catto; Andrew Doble; Alan Doherty; David Gillatt; Vincent Gnanapragasam; Owen Hughes; Roger Kockelbergh; Howard Kynaston; Alan Paul; Edgar Paez; Philip Powell; Stephen Prescott; Derek Rosario; Edward Rowe; David Neal
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.014

9.  Stimuli-responsive reagent system for enabling microfluidic immunoassays with biomarker purification and enrichment.

Authors:  John M Hoffman; Patrick S Stayton; Allan S Hoffman; James J Lai
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 4.774

10.  Uptake of prostate cancer screening and associated factors among Chinese men aged 50 or more: a population-based survey.

Authors:  Winnie K W So; Kai Chow Choi; Winnie P Y Tang; Paul C W Lee; Ann T Y Shiu; Simone S M Ho; Helen Y L Chan; Wendy W T Lam; William B Goggins; Carmen W H Chan
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.248

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.