Literature DB >> 2597949

Critical assessment of the quality of continence after postanal repair for faecal incontinence.

K Yoshioka1, M R Keighley.   

Abstract

One hundred and twenty-four patients had a postanal repair for the treatment of faecal incontinence between January 1976 and July 1987. One hundred and sixteen of these patients have been followed up for more than 1 year with a median follow-up of 5 years. Incontinence was improved in 81 per cent of patients. Furthermore, bowel frequency fell: 58 per cent had more than four bowel movements before operation compared with 19 per cent after operation. However, 60 per cent of patients still claimed urgency, 76 per cent still leaked faeces and 52 per cent continued to wear pads after the operation. Maximum resting anal pressure and maximum squeeze pressure did not change significantly after operation either in patients whose bowel control was improved or in those who were not. The results indicate that the quality of continence after postanal repair is poor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2597949     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800761023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  7 in total

1.  Treatment of anal incontinence by an implantable prosthetic anal sphincter.

Authors:  J Christiansen; B Sparsø
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Fecal incontinence: a review.

Authors:  Nicolas Bellicini; Peter J Molloy; Phillip Caushaj; Pamelasue Kozlowski
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  The pelvic floor in health and disease.

Authors:  A A Shelton; M L Welton
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1997-08

4.  [Long-term follow-up of Parks posterior repair. An electromyographic, manometric and radiologic study of 31 patients].

Authors:  S Athanasiadis; M Sanchez; A Kuprian
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1995

5.  Secondary surgery after failed postanal or anterior sphincter repair.

Authors:  A F Engel; W H Brummelkamp
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Fecal incontinence: indications for repairing the anal sphincter.

Authors:  F Penninckx
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The prevalence of anal sphincter defects in faecal incontinence: a prospective endosonic study.

Authors:  K I Deen; D Kumar; J G Williams; J Olliff; M R Keighley
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 23.059

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.