J Farah1, V Mares2, M Romero-Expósito3, S Trinkl4, C Domingo3, V Dufek5, M Klodowska6, J Kubancak7, Ž Knežević8, M Liszka6, M Majer8, S Miljanić8, O Ploc9, K Schinner2, L Stolarczyk6, F Trompier1, M Wielunski2, P Olko6, R M Harrison10. 1. Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Pôle Radioprotection de l'Homme, BP17, Fontenay-aux-Roses 92260, France. 2. Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Protection, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg 85764, Germany. 3. Departament de Física, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra E-08193, Spain. 4. Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Protection, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg 85764, Germany and Physik-Department, Technische Universität München, Garching 85748, Germany. 5. Czech Technical University in Prague, FNSPE, Břehová 7, Prague 115 19, Czech Republic and National Radiation Protection Institute, Bartoškova 28, Prague 140 00, Czech Republic. 6. Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow 31-342, Poland. 7. Czech Technical University in Prague, FNSPE, Břehová 7, Prague 115 19, Czech Republic and Department of Radiation Dosimetry, Nuclear Physics Institute, Řež CZ-250 68, Czech Republic. 8. Ruđer Bošković Institute, Bijenička c. 54, Zagreb 10000, Croatia. 9. Department of Radiation Dosimetry, Nuclear Physics Institute, Řež CZ-250 68, Czech Republic. 10. University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear NE1 7RU, United Kingdom.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To characterize stray radiation around the target volume in scanning proton therapy and study the performance of active neutron monitors. METHODS: Working Group 9 of the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS WG9-Radiation protection in medicine) carried out a large measurement campaign at the Trento Centro di Protonterapia (Trento, Italy) in order to determine the neutron spectra near the patient using two extended-range Bonner sphere spectrometry (BSS) systems. In addition, the work focused on acknowledging the performance of different commercial active dosimetry systems when measuring neutron ambient dose equivalents, H(∗)(10), at several positions inside (8 positions) and outside (3 positions) the treatment room. Detectors included three TEPCs--tissue equivalent proportional counters (Hawk type from Far West Technology, Inc.) and six rem-counters (WENDI-II, LB 6411, RadEye™ NL, a regular and an extended-range NM2B). Meanwhile, the photon component of stray radiation was deduced from the low-lineal energy transfer part of TEPC spectra or measured using a Thermo Scientific™ FH-40G survey meter. Experiments involved a water tank phantom (60 × 30 × 30 cm(3)) representing the patient that was uniformly irradiated using a 3 mm spot diameter proton pencil beam with 10 cm modulation width, 19.95 cm distal beam range, and 10 × 10 cm(2) field size. RESULTS: Neutron spectrometry around the target volume showed two main components at the thermal and fast energy ranges. The study also revealed the large dependence of the energy distribution of neutrons, and consequently of out-of-field doses, on the primary beam direction (directional emission of intranuclear cascade neutrons) and energy (spectral composition of secondary neutrons). In addition, neutron mapping within the facility was conducted and showed the highest H(∗)(10) value of ∼ 51 μSv Gy(-1); this was measured at 1.15 m along the beam axis. H(∗)(10) values significantly decreased with distance and angular position with respect to beam axis falling below 2 nSv Gy(-1) at the entrance of the maze, at the door outside the room and below detection limit in the gantry control room, and at an adjacent room (<0.1 nSv Gy(-1)). Finally, the agreement on H(∗)(10) values between all detectors showed a direct dependence on neutron spectra at the measurement position. While conventional rem-counters (LB 6411, RadEye™ NL, NM2-458) underestimated the H(∗)(10) by up to a factor of 4, Hawk TEPCs and the WENDI-II range-extended detector were found to have good performance (within 20%) even at the highest neutron fluence and energy range. Meanwhile, secondary photon dose equivalents were found to be up to five times lower than neutrons; remaining nonetheless of concern to the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Extended-range BSS, TEPCs, and the WENDI-II enable accurate measurements of stray neutrons while other rem-counters are not appropriate considering the high-energy range of neutrons involved in proton therapy.
PURPOSE: To characterize stray radiation around the target volume in scanning proton therapy and study the performance of active neutron monitors. METHODS: Working Group 9 of the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS WG9-Radiation protection in medicine) carried out a large measurement campaign at the Trento Centro di Protonterapia (Trento, Italy) in order to determine the neutron spectra near the patient using two extended-range Bonner sphere spectrometry (BSS) systems. In addition, the work focused on acknowledging the performance of different commercial active dosimetry systems when measuring neutron ambient dose equivalents, H(∗)(10), at several positions inside (8 positions) and outside (3 positions) the treatment room. Detectors included three TEPCs--tissue equivalent proportional counters (Hawk type from Far West Technology, Inc.) and six rem-counters (WENDI-II, LB 6411, RadEye™ NL, a regular and an extended-range NM2B). Meanwhile, the photon component of stray radiation was deduced from the low-lineal energy transfer part of TEPC spectra or measured using a Thermo Scientific™ FH-40G survey meter. Experiments involved a water tank phantom (60 × 30 × 30 cm(3)) representing the patient that was uniformly irradiated using a 3 mm spot diameter proton pencil beam with 10 cm modulation width, 19.95 cm distal beam range, and 10 × 10 cm(2) field size. RESULTS: Neutron spectrometry around the target volume showed two main components at the thermal and fast energy ranges. The study also revealed the large dependence of the energy distribution of neutrons, and consequently of out-of-field doses, on the primary beam direction (directional emission of intranuclear cascade neutrons) and energy (spectral composition of secondary neutrons). In addition, neutron mapping within the facility was conducted and showed the highest H(∗)(10) value of ∼ 51 μSv Gy(-1); this was measured at 1.15 m along the beam axis. H(∗)(10) values significantly decreased with distance and angular position with respect to beam axis falling below 2 nSv Gy(-1) at the entrance of the maze, at the door outside the room and below detection limit in the gantry control room, and at an adjacent room (<0.1 nSv Gy(-1)). Finally, the agreement on H(∗)(10) values between all detectors showed a direct dependence on neutron spectra at the measurement position. While conventional rem-counters (LB 6411, RadEye™ NL, NM2-458) underestimated the H(∗)(10) by up to a factor of 4, Hawk TEPCs and the WENDI-II range-extended detector were found to have good performance (within 20%) even at the highest neutron fluence and energy range. Meanwhile, secondary photon dose equivalents were found to be up to five times lower than neutrons; remaining nonetheless of concern to the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Extended-range BSS, TEPCs, and the WENDI-II enable accurate measurements of stray neutrons while other rem-counters are not appropriate considering the high-energy range of neutrons involved in proton therapy.
Authors: Linda Eliasson; Jan Lillhök; Torbjörn Bäck; Robert Billnert-Maróti; Alexandru Dasu; Malgorzata Liszka Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-08-02 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Vladimir Mares; Jad Farah; Marijke De Saint-Hubert; Szymon Domański; Carles Domingo; Martin Dommert; Magdalena Kłodowska; Katarzyna Krzempek; Michał Kuć; Immaculada Martínez-Rovira; Edyta Michaś; Natalia Mojżeszek; Łukasz Murawski; Ondrej Ploc; Maite Romero-Expósito; Marco Tisi; François Trompier; Olivier Van Hoey; Laurent Van Ryckeghem; Marek Wielunski; Roger M Harrison; Liliana Stolarczyk; Pawel Olko Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Olivier Van Hoey; Liliana Stolarczyk; Jan Lillhök; Linda Eliasson; Natalia Mojzeszek; Malgorzata Liszka; Ali Alkhiat; Vladimir Mares; François Trompier; Sebastian Trinkl; Immaculada Martínez-Rovira; Maite Romero-Expósito; Carles Domingo; Ondrej Ploc; Roger Harrison; Pawel Olko Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-09-08 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Anna Michaelidesová; Jana Vachelová; Jana Klementová; Tomáš Urban; Kateřina Pachnerová Brabcová; Stanislav Kaczor; Martin Falk; Iva Falková; Daniel Depeš; Vladimír Vondráček; Marie Davídková Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 5.923