Literature DB >> 25979049

Measurement of stray radiation within a scanning proton therapy facility: EURADOS WG9 intercomparison exercise of active dosimetry systems.

J Farah1, V Mares2, M Romero-Expósito3, S Trinkl4, C Domingo3, V Dufek5, M Klodowska6, J Kubancak7, Ž Knežević8, M Liszka6, M Majer8, S Miljanić8, O Ploc9, K Schinner2, L Stolarczyk6, F Trompier1, M Wielunski2, P Olko6, R M Harrison10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize stray radiation around the target volume in scanning proton therapy and study the performance of active neutron monitors.
METHODS: Working Group 9 of the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS WG9-Radiation protection in medicine) carried out a large measurement campaign at the Trento Centro di Protonterapia (Trento, Italy) in order to determine the neutron spectra near the patient using two extended-range Bonner sphere spectrometry (BSS) systems. In addition, the work focused on acknowledging the performance of different commercial active dosimetry systems when measuring neutron ambient dose equivalents, H(∗)(10), at several positions inside (8 positions) and outside (3 positions) the treatment room. Detectors included three TEPCs--tissue equivalent proportional counters (Hawk type from Far West Technology, Inc.) and six rem-counters (WENDI-II, LB 6411, RadEye™ NL, a regular and an extended-range NM2B). Meanwhile, the photon component of stray radiation was deduced from the low-lineal energy transfer part of TEPC spectra or measured using a Thermo Scientific™ FH-40G survey meter. Experiments involved a water tank phantom (60 × 30 × 30 cm(3)) representing the patient that was uniformly irradiated using a 3 mm spot diameter proton pencil beam with 10 cm modulation width, 19.95 cm distal beam range, and 10 × 10 cm(2) field size.
RESULTS: Neutron spectrometry around the target volume showed two main components at the thermal and fast energy ranges. The study also revealed the large dependence of the energy distribution of neutrons, and consequently of out-of-field doses, on the primary beam direction (directional emission of intranuclear cascade neutrons) and energy (spectral composition of secondary neutrons). In addition, neutron mapping within the facility was conducted and showed the highest H(∗)(10) value of ∼ 51 μSv Gy(-1); this was measured at 1.15 m along the beam axis. H(∗)(10) values significantly decreased with distance and angular position with respect to beam axis falling below 2 nSv Gy(-1) at the entrance of the maze, at the door outside the room and below detection limit in the gantry control room, and at an adjacent room (<0.1 nSv Gy(-1)). Finally, the agreement on H(∗)(10) values between all detectors showed a direct dependence on neutron spectra at the measurement position. While conventional rem-counters (LB 6411, RadEye™ NL, NM2-458) underestimated the H(∗)(10) by up to a factor of 4, Hawk TEPCs and the WENDI-II range-extended detector were found to have good performance (within 20%) even at the highest neutron fluence and energy range. Meanwhile, secondary photon dose equivalents were found to be up to five times lower than neutrons; remaining nonetheless of concern to the patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Extended-range BSS, TEPCs, and the WENDI-II enable accurate measurements of stray neutrons while other rem-counters are not appropriate considering the high-energy range of neutrons involved in proton therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25979049     DOI: 10.1118/1.4916667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  7 in total

1.  Ambient neutron and photon dose equivalent H*(10) around a pencil beam scanning proton therapy facility.

Authors:  Dayananda Shamurailatpam Sharma; Kartikeswar Ch Patro; Noufal Manthala Padannayel; Manikandan Arjunan; Ganapathy Krishnan; Rajesh Thiyagarajan; Srinivas Chilukuri; Rakesh Jalali
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Monte Carlo simulation of secondary neutron dose for scanning proton therapy using FLUKA.

Authors:  Chaeyeong Lee; Sangmin Lee; Seung-Jae Lee; Hankyeol Song; Dae-Hyun Kim; Sungkoo Cho; Kwanghyun Jo; Youngyih Han; Yong Hyun Chung; Jin Sung Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Range-shifter effects on the stray field in proton therapy measured with the variance-covariance method.

Authors:  Linda Eliasson; Jan Lillhök; Torbjörn Bäck; Robert Billnert-Maróti; Alexandru Dasu; Malgorzata Liszka
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Out-of-Field Doses Produced by a Proton Scanning Beam Inside Pediatric Anthropomorphic Phantoms and Their Comparison With Different Photon Modalities.

Authors:  Željka Knežević; Liliana Stolarczyk; Iva Ambrožová; Miguel Á Caballero-Pacheco; Marie Davídková; Marijke De Saint-Hubert; Carles Domingo; Kinga Jeleń; Renata Kopeć; Dawid Krzempek; Marija Majer; Saveta Miljanić; Natalia Mojżeszek; Maite Romero-Expósito; Immaculada Martínez-Rovira; Roger M Harrison; Paweł Olko
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Neutron Radiation Dose Measurements in a Scanning Proton Therapy Room: Can Parents Remain Near Their Children During Treatment?

Authors:  Vladimir Mares; Jad Farah; Marijke De Saint-Hubert; Szymon Domański; Carles Domingo; Martin Dommert; Magdalena Kłodowska; Katarzyna Krzempek; Michał Kuć; Immaculada Martínez-Rovira; Edyta Michaś; Natalia Mojżeszek; Łukasz Murawski; Ondrej Ploc; Maite Romero-Expósito; Marco Tisi; François Trompier; Olivier Van Hoey; Laurent Van Ryckeghem; Marek Wielunski; Roger M Harrison; Liliana Stolarczyk; Pawel Olko
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Simulation and experimental verification of ambient neutron doses in a pencil beam scanning proton therapy room as a function of treatment plan parameters.

Authors:  Olivier Van Hoey; Liliana Stolarczyk; Jan Lillhök; Linda Eliasson; Natalia Mojzeszek; Malgorzata Liszka; Ali Alkhiat; Vladimir Mares; François Trompier; Sebastian Trinkl; Immaculada Martínez-Rovira; Maite Romero-Expósito; Carles Domingo; Ondrej Ploc; Roger Harrison; Pawel Olko
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  In Vitro Comparison of Passive and Active Clinical Proton Beams.

Authors:  Anna Michaelidesová; Jana Vachelová; Jana Klementová; Tomáš Urban; Kateřina Pachnerová Brabcová; Stanislav Kaczor; Martin Falk; Iva Falková; Daniel Depeš; Vladimír Vondráček; Marie Davídková
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.