Literature DB >> 25979004

Point/Counterpoint. Evaluation of treatment plans using target and normal tissue DVHs is no longer appropriate.

Christopher F Njeh1, Brent C Parker2, Colin G Orton.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 25979004     DOI： 10.1118/1.4903902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN： 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  SPIDERplan: A tool to support decision-making in radiation therapy treatment plan assessment.

Authors:  Tiago Ventura; Maria do Carmo Lopes; Brigida Costa Ferreira; Leila Khouri
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-08-24

2.  Task-based image quality assessment in radiation therapy: initial characterization and demonstration with computer-simulation study.

Authors:  Steven R Dolly; Yang Lou; Mark A Anastasio; Hua Li
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Dose accumulation to assess the validity of treatment plans with reduced margins in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas J Lowther; Steven H Marsh; Robert J W Louwe
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-06-10

4.  Assessment of radiobiological metrics applied to patient-specific QA process of VMAT prostate treatments.

Authors:  Francisco Clemente-Gutiérrez; Consuelo Pérez-Vara; María H Clavo-Herranz; Concepción López-Carrizosa; José Pérez-Regadera; Carmen Ibáñez-Villoslada
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.