Literature DB >> 31252422

Task-based image quality assessment in radiation therapy: initial characterization and demonstration with computer-simulation study.

Steven R Dolly1, Yang Lou, Mark A Anastasio, Hua Li.   

Abstract

In the majority of current radiation therapy (RT) applications, image quality is still assessed subjectively or by utilizing physical measures. A novel theory that applies objective task-based image quality assessment in radiation therapy (IQA-in-RT) was recently proposed, in which the area under the therapeutic operating characteristic curve (AUTOC) was employed as the figure-of-merit (FOM) for evaluating RT effectiveness. Although theoretically more appealing than conventional subjective or physical measures, a comprehensive implementation and evaluation of this novel task-based IQA-in-RT theory is required for its further application in improving clinical RT. In this work, a practical and modular IQA-in-RT framework is presented for implementing this theory for the assessment of imaging components on the basis of RT treatment outcomes. Computer-simulation studies are conducted to demonstrate the feasibility and utility of the proposed IQA-in-RT framework in optimizing x-ray computed tomography (CT) pre-treatment imaging, including the optimization of CT imaging dose and image reconstruction parameters. The potential advantages of optimizing imaging components in the RT workflow by use of the AUTOC as the FOM are also compared against those of other physical measures. The results demonstrate that optimization using the AUTOC leads to selecting different parameters from those indicated by physical measures, potentially improving RT performance. The sources of systemic randomness and bias that affect the determination of the AUTOC are also analyzed. The presented work provides a practical solution for the further investigation and analysis of the task-based IQA-in-RT theory and advances its applications in improving RT clinical practice and cancer patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31252422      PMCID: PMC7371446          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab2dc5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  45 in total

1.  Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without intensity modulated beams: a planning comparison.

Authors:  G O De Meerleer; L A Vakaet; W R De Gersem; C De Wagter; B De Naeyer; W De Neve
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability.

Authors:  Paul A Yushkevich; Joseph Piven; Heather Cody Hazlett; Rachel Gimpel Smith; Sean Ho; James C Gee; Guido Gerig
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc.

Authors:  Karl Otto
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A heterogeneous dose distribution in simultaneous integrated boost: the role of the clonogenic cell density on the tumor control probability.

Authors:  L Strigari; M D'Andrea; A Abate; M Benassi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Complication probability as assessed from dose-volume histograms.

Authors:  J T Lyman
Journal:  Radiat Res Suppl       Date:  1985

6.  Benefit, risk, and optimization by ROC analysis in cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  J R Andrews
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Learning-based stochastic object models for characterizing anatomical variations.

Authors:  Steven R Dolly; Yang Lou; Mark A Anastasio; Hua Li
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Cancer statistics, 2015.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  A model for calculating tumour control probability in radiotherapy including the effects of inhomogeneous distributions of dose and clonogenic cell density.

Authors:  S Webb; A E Nahum
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Practical considerations for noise power spectra estimation for clinical CT scanners.

Authors:  Steven Dolly; Hsin-Chen Chen; Mark Anastasio; Sasa Mutic; Hua Li
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.