Literature DB >> 25978079

Defining the inherent stability of degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review.

Andrea M Simmonds1, Y Raja Rampersaud2, Marcel F Dvorak1, Nicolas Dea3, Angela D Melnyk1, Charles G Fisher1.   

Abstract

OBJECT A range of surgical options exists for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). The chosen technique inherently depends on the stability of the DLS. Despite a substantial body of literature dedicated to the outcome analysis of numerous DLS procedures, no consensus has been reached on defining or classifying the disorder with respect to stability or the role that instability should play in a treatment algorithm. The purpose of this study was to define grades of stability and to develop a guide for deciding on the optimal approach in surgically managing patients with DLS. METHODS The authors conducted a qualitative systematic review of clinical or biomechanical analyses evaluating the stability of and surgical outcomes for DLS for the period from 1990 to 2013. Research focused on nondegenerative forms of spondylolisthesis or spinal stenosis without associated DLS was excluded. The primary extracted results were clinical and radiographic parameters indicative of DLS instability. RESULTS The following preoperative parameters are predictors of stability in DLS: restabilization signs (disc height loss, osteophyte formation, vertebral endplate sclerosis, and ligament ossification), no disc angle change or less than 3 mm of translation on dynamic radiographs, and the absence of low-back pain. The validity and magnitude of each parameter's contribution can only be determined through appropriately powered prospective evaluation in the future. Identifying these parameters has allowed for the creation of a preliminary DLS instability classification (DSIC) scheme based on the preoperative assessment of DLS stability. CONCLUSIONS Spinal stability is an important factor to consider in the evaluation and treatment of patients with DLS. Qualitative assessment of the best available evidence revealed clinical and radiographic parameters for the creation of the DSIC, a decision aid to help surgeons develop a method of preoperative evaluation to better stratify DLS treatment options.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DLS = degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis; DSIC = degenerative spondylolisthesis instability classification; MeSH = Medical Subject Headings; degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis; qualitative systematic review; restabilization; stability; surgical technique

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25978079     DOI: 10.3171/2014.11.SPINE1426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  15 in total

1.  Slip progression in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis following minimally invasive decompression surgery is not associated with increased functional disability.

Authors:  Robert A Ravinsky; Eric J Crawford; Luke A Reda; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Good clinical outcomes in nonunion cases after facet fusion with a percutaneous pedicle screw system for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Tomohiro Miyashita; Hiromi Ataka; Kei Kato; Hiromitsu Takaoka; Takaaki Tanno
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Utility of the decubitus or the supine rather than the extension lateral radiograph in evaluating lumbar segmental instability.

Authors:  Qingshuang Zhou; Xu Sun; Yong Qiu; Zezhang Zhu; Liang Xu; Xiaojiang Pu; Bo Yang; Sinian Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Utility of Natural Sitting Lateral Radiograph in the Diagnosis of Segmental Instability for Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Qing-Shuang Zhou; Xu Sun; Xi Chen; Liang Xu; Bang-Ping Qian; Zezhang Zhu; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Flexion-extension standing radiographs underestimate instability in patients with single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis: comparing flexion-supine imaging may be more appropriate.

Authors:  Nathan J Lee; Justin Mathew; Jun S Kim; Joseph M Lombardi; Andrew C Vivas; Jay Reidler; Scott L Zuckerman; Paul J Park; Eric Leung; Meghan Cerpa; Mark Weidenbaum; Lawrence G Lenke; Ronald A Lehman; Zeeshan M Sardar
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-03

6.  A Novel Nonpedicular Screw-Based Fixation in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Ming-Hong Chen; Jen-Yuh Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostic rules based on systematic reviews.

Authors:  Tom Petersen; Mark Laslett; Carsten Juhl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Comparison of Decompression, Decompression Plus Fusion, and Decompression Plus Stabilization for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective, Randomized Study.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Inose; Tsuyoshi Kato; Masato Yuasa; Tsuyoshi Yamada; Hidetsugu Maehara; Takashi Hirai; Toshitaka Yoshii; Shigenori Kawabata; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.876

9.  A Comparative Study of Decompressive Laminectomy and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Grade I Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Sang-Il Kim; Kee-Yong Ha; Young-Hoon Kim; Young-Ho Kim; In-Soo Oh
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Variation in surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis in Canada: surgeon assessment of stability and impact on treatment.

Authors:  Charles G Fisher; Y Raja Rampersaud; R Andrew Glennie; Christopher S Bailey; Edward Abraham; Neil Manson; Steve Casha; Kenneth Thomas; Jerome Paquet; Greg McIntosh; Hamiton Hall
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.