Literature DB >> 33834127

Flexion-extension standing radiographs underestimate instability in patients with single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis: comparing flexion-supine imaging may be more appropriate.

Nathan J Lee1, Justin Mathew1, Jun S Kim1, Joseph M Lombardi1, Andrew C Vivas1, Jay Reidler1, Scott L Zuckerman1, Paul J Park1, Eric Leung1, Meghan Cerpa1, Mark Weidenbaum1, Lawrence G Lenke1, Ronald A Lehman1, Zeeshan M Sardar1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Generally, most spine surgeons agree that increased segmental motion viewed on flexion-extension radiographs is a reliable predictor of instability; however, these views can be limited in several ways and may underestimate the instability at a given lumbar segment.
METHODS: Consecutively collected adult (≥18 years old) patients with symptomatic single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis were reviewed from a two-surgeon database from 2015 to 2019. Routine standing lumbar X-rays (neutral, flexion, extension) and supine lumbar MRI (sagittal T2-weighted imaging sequence) were performed. Patients were excluded if they had prior lumbar surgery, missing radiographic data, or if the time between X-rays and MRI was >6 months.
RESULTS: All 39 patients with symptomatic, single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis were identified. The mean age was 57.3±16.7 years and 66% were female. There was good intra- and inter-rater reliability agreement between measured values on the presence of instability. The slip percentage (SP) difference was significantly highest in the flexion-supine (FS) (5.7 mm, 12.3%) and neutral standing-supine (NS) (4.3 mm, 8.7%) groups, both of which were significantly higher compared with the flexion-extension (FE) group (1.8 mm, 4.5%, P<0.001). Ventral instability based on SP >8% was observed more frequently in FS (79.5%) and NS (52.6%) groups compared with FE group (16.7%, P<0.001). No statistically significant correlation was found between SP and disc angle for all radiographic views.
CONCLUSIONS: Comparing standing lateral and flexion X-rays with supine MRIs provides higher sensitivity to assess instability than standard flexion-extension radiographs. The FS and NS comparisons also show greater slip percentage differences at higher slip grades, but not at different lumbar levels. These changes are not dependent on age or gender. 2021 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Spondylolisthesis; anterolisthesis; flexion-extension lumbar (FE lumbar); radiographic lumbar instability; ventral instability

Year:  2021        PMID: 33834127      PMCID: PMC8024755          DOI: 10.21037/jss-20-631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  31 in total

1.  Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis.

Authors:  H N Herkowitz; L T Kurz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy.

Authors:  Claudius Thomé; Dimitris Zevgaridis; Olaf Leheta; Hansjörg Bäzner; Christiane Pöckler-Schöniger; Johannes Wöhrle; Peter Schmiedek
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-08

Review 3.  Lumbar intervertebral instability: a review.

Authors:  Antonio Leone; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Victor N Cassar-Pullicino; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Decompression in the surgical management of degenerative spondylolisthesis: advantages of a conservative approach in 290 patients.

Authors:  N E Epstein
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1998-04

Review 5.  Effectiveness of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenli Chang; Peizhi Yuwen; Yanbing Zhu; Ning Wei; Chen Feng; Yingze Zhang; Wei Chen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Radiologic diagnosis of degenerative lumbar spinal instability.

Authors:  P R Dupuis; K Yong-Hing; J D Cassidy; W H Kirkaldy-Willis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Flexion and extension radiography of the lumbar spine: a comparison with lumbar discography.

Authors:  R C Quinnell; H R Stockdale
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  A systematic review of clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Shaya Noorian; Karen Sorensen; Woojin Cho
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Patient and radiographer assessment of slump sitting flexion compared to conventional standing forward bending flexion.

Authors:  Hwee Weng Dennis Hey; Denise Ai Wen Choong; Adrian Zhigao Lin; Eugene Tze-Chun Lau; Alex Quok An Teo; Gabriel Liu; Hee-Kit Wong
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

10.  The correlation between exaggerated fluid in lumbar facet joints and degenerative spondylolisthesis: prospective study of 52 patients.

Authors:  R Caterini; F Mancini; S Bisicchia; P Maglione; P Farsetti
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-05-20
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Best Practices for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treatment 2.0 (MIST): Consensus Guidance from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN).

Authors:  Timothy R Deer; Jay S Grider; Jason E Pope; Tim J Lamer; Sayed E Wahezi; Jonathan M Hagedorn; Steven Falowski; Reda Tolba; Jay M Shah; Natalie Strand; Alex Escobar; Mark Malinowski; Anjum Bux; Navdeep Jassal; Jennifer Hah; Jacqueline Weisbein; Nestor D Tomycz; Jessica Jameson; Erika A Petersen; Dawood Sayed
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.832

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.