Literature DB >> 25978078

Mapping occipital bone thickness using computed tomography for safe screw placement.

Tomonori Morita1, Tsuneo Takebayashi1, Hiroyuki Takashima1, Mitsunori Yoshimoto1, Kazunori Ida1, Katsumasa Tanimoto1, Hirofumi Ohnishi2, Hiroyoshi Fujiwara3, Masateru Nagae3, Toshihiko Yamashita1.   

Abstract

OBJECT Safe and effective insertion of occipital bone screws requires morphological analysis of the occipital bone, which is poorly documented in the literature. The authors of this study present morphological data for determining the area of screw placement for optimal internal fixation. METHODS The subjects of this institutional review board-approved retrospective study were 105 individuals without head and neck disease who underwent CT imaging at the authors' hospital. There were 55 males and 50 females, with a mean age of 57.1 years (range 20-91 years). Measurements using CT were taken according to a matrix of 55 points following a grid with 1-cm spacing based on the external occipital protuberance (EOP). RESULTS The maximum thickness of the occipital bone was at the level of the EOP at 16.4 mm. Areas with thicknesses > 8 mm were more frequent at the EOP and up to 2 cm in all directions, as well as up to 1 cm in all directions at a height of 1 cm inferiorly, and up to 3 cm from the EOP inferiorly. The male group tended to have a thicker occipital bone than the female group, and the differences were significant around the EOP. The ratio of the trabecular bone to the occipital bone thickness was > 30% in the central region. At positions more than 2 cm laterally, the ratio was < 15%, and the ratio gradually decreased further laterally. CONCLUSIONS Screws that are 8 mm long can be placed in the area extending 2 cm laterally from the EOP at the level of the superior nuchal line and approximately 3 cm inferior to the center. These results suggest that it may be possible to effectively insert a screw over a wider area than the conventional reference range.

Keywords:  EOP = external occipital protuberance; ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient; morphological analysis; occipital bone; occipitocervical fusion; technique; thickness

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25978078     DOI: 10.3171/2014.11.SPINE14624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  5 in total

1.  A novel surgical protocol for safe and accurate placement of C1 lateral mass screws in patients with atlas assimilation, basilar invagination and atlantoaxial instability: technical details, accuracy assessment and perioperative complications.

Authors:  Yue-Qi Du; Yi-Heng Yin; Teng Li; Guang-Yu Qiao; Xin-Guang Yu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A computed tomography-based analysis of the structure of the mandible according to age and sex.

Authors:  Soyeon Jung; Hyunjong Yun; Chul Hoon Chung; Kuylhee Kim; Yongjoon Chang
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2022-06-20

3.  [Structural characteristics of the deciduous teeth of Tibetan miniature pigs].

Authors:  Ting Lu; Yingchun Zheng; Haiying Yang; Buling Wu; Jun Xiong; Cheng Huang; Yuhua Pan; Meiyi Li; Fei He; Fu Xiong
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-09-30

4.  Occipital bone thickness: Implications on occipital-cervical fusion. A cadaveric study.

Authors:  Kourosh Zarghooni; Chrisoph K Boese; Jan Siewe; Marc Röllinghoff; Peer Eysel; Max J Scheyerer
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 1.511

5.  Computed Tomographic Study of Occipital Thickness in Ethnic Malays.

Authors:  M I Yusof; A N Sadagatullah; J Johari; A A Salim; M Govindasamy
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2022-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.