Literature DB >> 25975490

Host systemic inflammatory response influences outcome in pancreatic cancer.

Clem W Imrie1.   

Abstract

This review of the influence of host systemic inflammatory response(SIR) on the outcome of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)was the kernel of the 2014 George E Palade Memorial Prize Lecture at the Combined IAP-EPC Meeting held June 25-8 in Southampton,UK. The ability of the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score(mGPS) to stratify cancer outcomes has been demonstrated in >50 studies including >25000 patients from many countries. Other markers of SIR such as Prognostic Index and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio(NLR) may also be used emphasising the non homogeneity of the PDAC patients. The mGPS score 0 is associated with better outcome,while scores of 1 &amp; 2 are linked to poor performance status, greater weight loss, comorbidity and earlier death. Two papers show in resectable PDAC that longer life (27-37 months) occurs with mGPS 0, and < 18 months for mGPS 1 and 2, such that alternative therapy employing RFA may well be better than resection in those patients. In the greater number of PDAC patients unsuitable for resection the JAK-STAT inhibitor, ruxolitinib, has been found only to favourably modify PDAC in those with mGPS 1 or 2. Likewise the possible benefits of older anti inflammatory agents may be confined to these patients. An urgent reappraisal of the prognostic and therapeutic implications is now required in PDAC. Local inflammatory responses(LIR) are beneficial in PDAC and other cancers. Four grade stratification systems using Klintrup histology, T cell subtype analysis and Galon immune scores are accurate prognosticators.
Copyright © 2015 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-inflammatory drugs; Non-homogeneity of cancer patients; RFA with chemo-radiotherapy; Radical surgical resection; Systemic and local inflammatory responses; mGPS and PDAC outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25975490     DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pancreatology        ISSN: 1424-3903            Impact factor:   3.996


  9 in total

1.  Ruxolitinib + capecitabine in advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer after disease progression/intolerance to first-line therapy: JANUS 1 and 2 randomized phase III studies.

Authors:  Herbert Hurwitz; Eric Van Cutsem; Johanna Bendell; Manuel Hidalgo; Chung-Pin Li; Marcelo Garrido Salvo; Teresa Macarulla; Vaibhav Sahai; Ashwin Sama; Edward Greeno; Kenneth H Yu; Chris Verslype; Fitzroy Dawkins; Chris Walker; Jason Clark; Eileen M O'Reilly
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Predictive Values of Preoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index for Long-Term Survival in High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Huifeng Bi; Zhenhua Shang; Chunsong Jia; Jiangtao Wu; Bo Cui; Qi Wang; Tongwen Ou
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratio as predictors of disease specific survival after resection of adrenocortical carcinoma.

Authors:  Fabio Bagante; Thuy B Tran; Lauren M Postlewait; Shishir K Maithel; Tracy S Wang; Douglas B Evans; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; John E Phay; Kara Keplinger; Ryan C Fields; Linda X Jin; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Jason K Sicklick; Shady Gad; Adam C Yopp; John C Mansour; Quan-Yang Duh; Natalie Seiser; Carmen C Solorzano; Colleen M Kiernan; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos; Edward A Levine; George A Poultsides; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Albumin concentrations plus neutrophil lymphocyte ratios for predicting overall survival after curative resection for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xiaowei Sun; Juncheng Wang; Jianjun Liu; Shangxiang Chen; Xuechao Liu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  A Novel Prognostic Scoring System Using Inflammatory Response Biomarkers for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Noriyuki Hirahara; Yoshitsugu Tajima; Yusuke Fujii; Tetsu Yamamoto; Ryoji Hyakudomi; Takanori Hirayama; Takahito Taniura; Kazunari Ishitobi; Akihiko Kidani; Yasunari Kawabata
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Survival Analysis in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery According to the International Consensus on the 2017 Definition of Borderline Resectable Cancer.

Authors:  Aoi Hayasaki; Shuji Isaji; Masashi Kishiwada; Takehiro Fujii; Yusuke Iizawa; Hiroyuki Kato; Akihiro Tanemura; Yasuhiro Murata; Yoshinori Azumi; Naohisa Kuriyama; Shugo Mizuno; Masanobu Usui; Hiroyuki Sakurai
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Prognostic and clinical significance of modified glasgow prognostic score in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of 4,629 patients.

Authors:  Dongdong Wu; Xingmu Wang; Ge Shi; Honggang Sun; Guoxing Ge
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.682

8.  Combined neutrophil/platelet/lymphocyte/differentiation score predicts chemosensitivity in advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Zhenhua Huang; Yantan Liu; Chen Yang; Xiaoyin Li; Changqie Pan; Jinjun Rao; Nailin Li; Wangjun Liao; Li Lin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  The Prognostic Index Independently Predicts Survival in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Resection.

Authors:  Elisabeth S Gruber; Gerd Jomrich; Alexandra Kaider; Michael Gnant; Klaus Sahora; Martin Schindl
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 5.344

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.