| Literature DB >> 25974140 |
Timothy L Kline1, Maria V Irazabal2, Behzad Ebrahimi2, Katharina Hopp2, Kelly N Udoji1, Joshua D Warner1, Panagiotis Korfiatis1, Prasanna K Mishra3, Slobodan I Macura3, Sudhakar K Venkatesh1, Lilach O Lerman2, Peter C Harris2,3, Vicente E Torres2, Bernard F King1, Bradley J Erickson1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Noninvasive imaging techniques that quantify renal tissue composition are needed to more accurately ascertain prognosis and monitor disease progression in polycystic kidney disease (PKD). Given the success of magnetization transfer (MT) imaging to characterize various tissue remodeling pathologies, it was tested on a murine model of autosomal dominant PKD.Entities:
Keywords: Gaussian mixture model; fibrosis; histology; in vivo imaging; quantitative MRI; skewness
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25974140 PMCID: PMC4644111 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25701
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Magn Reson Med ISSN: 0740-3194 Impact factor: 4.668
Basic Measurements for the 22 C57Bl/6 Pkd1 RC/RC Mice
| Measurement | 9 Months Old | 12 Months Old | 15 Months Old | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | |
| Body weight, g | 23.8 ± 0.4 | 25.8 ± 1.8 | 24.1 ± 1.5 | 29.5 ± 2.0 | 23.9 ± 1.5 | 28.5 ± 2.0 |
| Kidney weight, g | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.1 |
| KW/BW, % | 3.8 ± 0.7 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 4.0 ± 0.9 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 4.3 ± 1.0 | 2.5 ± 0.3 |
| BUN, mg/dl | 45 ± 19 | 18 ± 3 | 74 ± 36 | 21 ± 4 | 93 ± 28 | 28 ± 3 |
| H&E cystic index, % | 22 ± 5 | 8 ± 3 | 42 ± 12 | 11 ± 5 | 42 ± 11 | 16 ± 9 |
| PSR fibrotic index, % | 17 ± 6 | 2 ± 1 | 16 ± 7 | 5 ± 1 | 16 ± 6 | 6 ± 8 |
| TRI fibrotic index, % | 18 ± 6 | 2 ± 1 | 14 ± 5 | 8 ± 3 | 18 ± 4 | 9 ± 10 |
Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Cystic index was measured in H&E stained histological sections, and fibrotic index was measured by both picrosirius red and Masson's trichrome stained histological sections.
Abbreviations: BUN, blood urea nitrogen; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; KW/BW, kidney weight/body weight; PSR, picrosirius red; TRI, Masson's trichrome.
Figure 1Examples of three different specimens imaged by MRI. Left column: MT images obtained with saturation on (Ms). Middle column: MT images obtained with saturation off (M0). Right column: Calculated MTR maps (computed as defined by Equation (1)). The three examples were chosen to highlight the wide range of observed phenotype expression in the mouse model. The top row highlights a fairly mild presentation of the disease in a 9‐month‐old male (KW/BW = 2.2%, cystic index = 5%, fibrotic index = 2%) that had a number of microcysts and a few large exophytic cysts. The middle row shows a much more severe presentation in a 12‐month‐old female (KW/BW = 4.3%, cystic index = 43%, fibrotic index = 10%). The bottom row shows asymmetric presentation in a 12‐month‐old female in which the left kidney presented much more severely than the right kidney (KW/BW = 5.3%, cystic index = 57%, fibrotic index = 9%). A color bar for the MTR images is displayed at bottom right. Scale bar = 1 mm.
Basic Statistical Measurements for the MTR Values Found Within the Mouse Kidneys
| Measurement | 9 Months Old | 12 Months Old | 15 Months Old | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | Female | Female | Male | Female | |
| Mean | 0.51 ± 0.06 | 0.57 ± 0.06 | 0.37 ± 0.10 | 0.57 ± 0.07 | 0.30 ± 0.05 | 0.49 ± 0.07 |
| Median | 0.53 ± 0.06 | 0.61 ± 0.05 | 0.37 ± 0.13 | 0.61 ± 0.04 | 0.27 ± 0.14 | 0.48 ± 0.08 |
| Variance | 0.018 ± 0.002 | 0.020 ± 0.011 | 0.084 ± 0.107 | 0.020 ± 0.024 | 0.034 ± 0.010 | 0.019 ± 0.012 |
| 25th Percentile | 0.44 ± 0.06 | 0.57 ± 0.03 | 0.27 ± 0.12 | 0.55 ± 0.04 | 0.14 ± 0.10 | 0.40 ± 0.12 |
| 75th Percentile | 0.59 ± 0.05 | 0.67 ± 0.02 | 0.54 ± 0.07 | 0.65 ± 0.01 | 0.41 ± 0.11 | 0.55 ± 0.06 |
| Median absolute deviation | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.14 ± 0.05 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.05 | 0.08 ± 0.03 |
| Skewness | −1.13 ± 0.50 | −2.44 ± 0.17 | −0.30 ± 0.57 | −2.07 ± 0.35 | 0.23 ± 0.71 | −1.06 ± 0.55 |
| Kurtosis | 2.24 ± 1.50 | 7.92 ± 1.20 | −0.34 ± 0.73 | 5.27 ± 2.36 | −0.19 ± 0.91 | 2.81 ± 0.33 |
Figure 2A: Comparison of global measurement of mean kidney MTR values with the cystic index measured by histology. Although the mean MTR values are only a crude representation of the wealth of information contained in the MTR maps, the fact that they correlated closely with the cystic burden of the kidneys suggests that deeper probing can reliably extract not only macroscopic presentations of the disease but also subresolution tissue changes. B: Comparison of local measurement of mean kidney MTR values with the cystic index measured by histology. In this case, a much closer correlation between the results obtained by MT imaging and the ground truth histological measurements were obtained. Thus, at the local level, MT imaging conveys information regarding subresolution microscopic cysts.
Figure 3A: Cystic index computed by the GMM approach on MTR images correlated with that measured by histology. Distinguishing the different tissues on MT by the GMM approach had very high accuracy at measuring the degree of cystic burden of each specimen. B: Using a two‐tissue GMM approach, the skewness of the P‐F tissue class was computed and correlated with the measured fibrotic index (obtained from the picrosirius red histology measurement). This correlation was very similar when compared with the Masson's trichrome–derived fibrotic index.
Figure 4A: MTR map. B: Cystic probability map displaying cystic regions in red. Microcysts (subvoxel) appear green in this representation due to voxel partial volume effects. C: Fibrotic probability map showing more fibrotic regions in green and red. For the corresponding panels, the color bar indicates the probability (or volume fraction) of each voxel to be cystic or fibrotic, where blue indicates 0% and red indicates 100%. D: MTR histogram and GMM classification overlaid. Cystic tissue is conveyed by the green component, parenchyma is conveyed by the red component, and fibrotic tissue is conveyed by the blue component. E: Corresponding histological slice stained with hematoxylin and eosin. F: Picrosirius red staining. The application of a three‐tissue GMM approach to delineate both cystic (green) and fibrotic (blue) from normal healthy parenchyma tissue (red) was achievable in more severe cases such as this example (panel D). The posterior probability maps for both cysts (comparing panels B–E) and fibrotic tissue (comparing panels C–F) correspond closely to the ground truth observed in the histological slides. Scale bar = 1 mm.