Literature DB >> 25972247

Systematic review of the behavioural assessment of pain in cats.

Isabella Merola1, Daniel S Mills2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to review systematically the range of assessment tools used in cats to detect the behavioural expression of pain and the evidence of their quality; and to examine behavioural metrics (considering both the sensory and affective domains) used to assess pain.
METHODS: A search of PubMed and ScienceDirect, alongside articles known to the authors, from 2000 onwards, for papers in English was performed. This was followed by a manual search of the references within the primary data sources. Only peer-reviewed publications that provided information on the assessment tool used to evaluate the behavioural expression of pain in cats, in conscious animals (not anaesthetised cats), were included.
RESULTS: No previous systematic reviews were identified. One hundred papers were included in the final assessment. Studies were primarily related to the assessment of pain in relation to surgical procedures, and no clear distinction was made concerning the onset of acute and chronic pain. Ten broad types of instrument to assess pain were identified, and generally the quality of evidence to support the use of the various instruments was poor. Only one specific instrument (UNESP-Botucatu scale) had published evidence of validity, reliability and sensitivity at the level of a randomised control trial, but with a positive rather than placebo control, and limited to its use in the ovariohysterectomy situation. The metrics used within the tools appeared to focus primarily on the sensory aspect of pain, with no study clearly discriminating between the sensory and affective components of pain. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Further studies are required to provide a higher quality of evidence for methods used to assess pain in cats. Furthermore, a consistent definition for acute and chronic pain is needed. Tools need to be validated that can detect pain in a range of conditions and by different evaluators (veterinary surgeons and owners), which consider both the sensory and emotional aspects of pain. © ISFM and AAFP 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25972247     DOI: 10.1177/1098612X15578725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Feline Med Surg        ISSN: 1098-612X            Impact factor:   2.015


  11 in total

1.  Validation of the Unesp-Botucatu composite scale to assess acute postoperative abdominal pain in sheep (USAPS).

Authors:  Nuno Emanuel Oliveira Figueiredo Silva; Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade; Alice Rodrigues Oliveira; Marilda Onghero Taffarel; Maria Alice Pires Moreira; Renan Denadai; Paula Barreto Rocha; Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Persistence of pain in humans and other mammals.

Authors:  Amanda C de C Williams
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Validation of the UNESP-Botucatu pig composite acute pain scale (UPAPS).

Authors:  Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna; Ana Lucélia de Araújo; Pedro Isidro da Nóbrega Neto; Juliana Tabarelli Brondani; Flávia Augusta de Oliveira; Liliane Marinho Dos Santos Azerêdo; Felipe Garcia Telles; Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Catestatin, vasostatin, cortisol, and pain assessments in dogs suffering from traumatic bone fractures.

Authors:  Thanikul Srithunyarat; Ragnvi Hagman; Odd V Höglund; Mats Stridsberg; Ulf Olsson; Jeanette Hanson; Chalermkwan Nonthakotr; Anne-Sofie Lagerstedt; Ann Pettersson
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-03-21

5.  Evaluation and comparison of pain questionnaires for clinical screening of osteoarthritis in cats.

Authors:  Sarah Stadig; B Duncan X Lascelles; Gorel Nyman; Anna Bergh
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  Development, Validation, and Reliability of a Sedation Scale in Horses (EquiSed).

Authors:  Alice Rodrigues de Oliveira; Miguel Gozalo-Marcilla; Simone Katja Ringer; Stijn Schauvliege; Mariana Werneck Fonseca; Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade; José Nicolau Prospero Puoli Filho; Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-02-16

7.  Clinical validation of the short and long UNESP-Botucatu scales for feline pain assessment.

Authors:  Maíra Belli; Alice R de Oliveira; Mayara T de Lima; Pedro H E Trindade; Paulo V Steagall; Stelio P L Luna
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Multilingual validation of the short form of the Unesp-Botucatu Feline Pain Scale (UFEPS-SF).

Authors:  Stelio P L Luna; Pedro H E Trindade; Beatriz P Monteiro; Nadia Crosignani; Giorgia Della Rocca; Helene L M Ruel; Kazuto Yamashita; Peter Kronen; Chia Te Tseng; Lívia Teixeira; Paulo V Steagall
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Is a "Good Death" at the Time of Animal Slaughter an Essentially Contested Concept?

Authors:  Qurat ulAin; Terry L Whiting
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Determining priority welfare issues for cats in the United Kingdom using expert consensus.

Authors:  Fiona Rioja-Lang; Heather Bacon; Melanie Connor; Cathy Mary Dwyer
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2019-11-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.