Literature DB >> 25969411

Wearable technology: using Google Glass as a teaching tool.

Hui Min Knight1, Parag Ravindra Gajendragadkar2, Awais Bokhari2.   

Abstract

Wearable technology holds great promise in revolutionising healthcare delivery. The benefits can also be seen in medical education and delivering healthcare in remote places. We report the use of Google Glass technology as a teaching tool in broadcasting a procedure onto a mobile phone as a viewer, replacing expensive and often cumbersome existing equipment. 2015 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 25969411      PMCID： PMC4434360          DOI： 10.1136/bcr-2014-208768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Case Rep        ISSN： 1757-790X


  6 in total

1.  Emerging technology in surgical education: combining real-time augmented reality and wearable computing devices.

Authors:  Brent A Ponce; Mariano E Menendez; Lasun O Oladeji; Charles T Fryberger; Phani K Dantuluri
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.390

2.  Video-based self-review: comparing Google Glass and GoPro technologies.

Authors:  John A M Paro; Rahim Nazareli; Anadev Gurjala; Aaron Berger; Gordon K Lee
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.539

3.  Accuracy of remote electrocardiogram interpretation with the use of Google Glass technology.

Authors:  Omar M Jeroudi; George Christakopoulos; George Christopoulos; Anna Kotsia; Megan A Kypreos; Bavana V Rangan; Subhash Banerjee; Emmanouil S Brilakis
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  First "glass" education: telementored cardiac ultrasonography using Google Glass- a pilot study.

Authors:  Patrick M Russell; Michael Mallin; Scott T Youngquist; Jennifer Cotton; Nael Aboul-Hosn; Matt Dawson
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  Do you see what I see? Insights from using google glass for disaster telemedicine triage.

Authors:  Mark X Cicero; Barbara Walsh; Yauheni Solad; Travis Whitfill; Geno Paesano; Kristin Kim; Carl R Baum; David C Cone
Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.040

6.  Live broadcasting in cardiac surgery does not increase the operative risk.

Authors:  Joerg Seeburger; Anno Diegeler; Karl Dossche; Rüdiger Lange; Friedrich Wilhelm Mohr; Christian Schreiber; Hugo Vanermen; Volkmar Falk
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.191
  6 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  [Wearable Technologies for Urologists].

Authors:  H Borgmann; J Huber; A Miernik; J Salem
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  A Systematic Review of the Use of Google Glass in Graduate Medical Education.

Authors:  Joseph F Carrera; Connor C Wang; William Clark; Andrew M Southerland
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-12

Review 3.  Using Google Glass in Surgical Settings: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nancy J Wei; Bryn Dougherty; Aundria Myers; Sherif M Badawy
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.773

4.  Augmented Reality as a Telemedicine Platform for Remote Procedural Training.

Authors:  Shiyao Wang; Michael Parsons; Jordan Stone-McLean; Peter Rogers; Sarah Boyd; Kristopher Hoover; Oscar Meruvia-Pastor; Minglun Gong; Andrew Smith
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  The Potential for Undue Patient Exposure during the Use of Telementoring Technology.

Authors:  David P Darrow; Anthony Spano; Andrew Grande
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-04-08

6.  Smart technology for healthcare: Exploring the antecedents of adoption intention of healthcare wearable technology.

Authors:  Ka Yin Chau; Michael Huen Sum Lam; Man Lai Cheung; Ejoe Kar Ho Tso; Stuart W Flint; David R Broom; Gary Tse; Ka Yiu Lee
Journal:  Health Psychol Res       Date:  2019-09-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.