First responders often wear personal protective equipment (PPE) for protection from on-the-job hazards. While PPE ensembles offer individuals protection, they limit one's ability to thermoregulate, and can place the wearer in danger of heat exhaustion and higher cardiac stress. Automatically monitoring thermal-work strain is one means to manage these risks, but measuring core body temperature (Tc) has proved problematic. An algorithm that estimates Tc from sequential measures of heart rate (HR) was compared to the observed Tc from 27 US soldiers participating in three different chemical/biological training events (45-90 min duration) while wearing PPE. Hotter participants (higher Tc) averaged (HRs) of 140 bpm and reached Tc around 39 °C. Overall the algorithm had a small bias (0.02 °C) and root mean square error (0.21 °C). Limits of agreement (LoA ± 0.48 °C) were similar to comparisons of Tc measured by oesophageal and rectal probes. The algorithm shows promise for use in real-time monitoring of encapsulated first responders. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY: An algorithm to estimate core temperature (Tc) from non-invasive measures of HR was validated. Three independent studies (n = 27) compared the estimated Tc to the observed Tc in humans participating in chemical/ biological hazard training. The algorithm’s bias and variance to observed data were similar to that found from comparisons of oesophageal and rectal measurements.
First responders often wear personal protective equipment (PPE) for protection from on-the-job hazards. While PPE ensembles offer individuals protection, they limit one's ability to thermoregulate, and can place the wearer in danger of heat exhaustion and higher cardiac stress. Automatically monitoring thermal-work strain is one means to manage these risks, but measuring core body temperature (Tc) has proved problematic. An algorithm that estimates Tc from sequential measures of heart rate (HR) was compared to the observed Tc from 27 US soldiers participating in three different chemical/biological training events (45-90 min duration) while wearing PPE. Hotter participants (higher Tc) averaged (HRs) of 140 bpm and reached Tc around 39 °C. Overall the algorithm had a small bias (0.02 °C) and root mean square error (0.21 °C). Limits of agreement (LoA ± 0.48 °C) were similar to comparisons of Tc measured by oesophageal and rectal probes. The algorithm shows promise for use in real-time monitoring of encapsulated first responders. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY: An algorithm to estimate core temperature (Tc) from non-invasive measures of HR was validated. Three independent studies (n = 27) compared the estimated Tc to the observed Tc in humans participating in chemical/ biological hazard training. The algorithm’s bias and variance to observed data were similar to that found from comparisons of oesophageal and rectal measurements.
Authors: Yuri Hosokawa; Douglas J Casa; Juli M Trtanj; Luke N Belval; Patricia A Deuster; Sarah M Giltz; Andrew J Grundstein; Michelle D Hawkins; Robert A Huggins; Brenda Jacklitsch; John F Jardine; Hunter Jones; Josh B Kazman; Mark E Reynolds; Rebecca L Stearns; Jennifer K Vanos; Alan L Williams; W Jon Williams Journal: Int J Biometeorol Date: 2019-02-02 Impact factor: 3.787
Authors: Sherry G Mansour; Thomas G Martin; Wassim Obeid; Rachel W Pata; Karen M Myrick; Lidiya Kukova; Yaqi Jia; Petter Bjornstad; Joe M El-Khoury; Chirag R Parikh Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-08-14 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Francisco Martín-Rodríguez; Ancor Sanz-García; Raúl López-Izquierdo; Juan F Delgado Benito; José L Martín-Conty; Miguel A Castro Villamor; Guillermo J Ortega Journal: Clin Simul Nurs Date: 2020-09-02 Impact factor: 2.391
Authors: Yuta J Masuda; Teevrat Garg; Ike Anggraeni; Kristie Ebi; Jennifer Krenz; Edward T Game; Nicholas H Wolff; June T Spector Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Joshua Hagen; Jason D Stone; W Guy Hornsby; Mark Stephenson; Robert Mangine; Michael Joseph; Scott Galster Journal: J Funct Morphol Kinesiol Date: 2020-09-03
Authors: Daniel Sim; Michael C Brothers; Joseph M Slocik; Ahmad E Islam; Benji Maruyama; Claude C Grigsby; Rajesh R Naik; Steve S Kim Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 16.806
Authors: Johannus Q de Korte; Bertil J Veenstra; Mark van Rijswick; Eline J K Derksen; Maria T E Hopman; Coen C W G Bongers; Thijs M H Eijsvogels Journal: Front Sports Act Living Date: 2022-06-22
Authors: Charlotte Christina Roossien; Audy Paul Hodselmans; Ronald Heus; Michiel Felix Reneman; Gijsbertus Jacob Verkerke Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 3.390