| Literature DB >> 32313805 |
Shovon Bhattacharjee1,2, Rakesh Joshi3, Abrar Ahmad Chughtai4, Chandini Raina Macintyre5.
Abstract
Personal protective clothing is intended to protect the wearer from various hazards (mechanical, biological, chemical, thermal, radiological, etc.) and inhospitable environmental conditions that may cause harm or even death. There are various types of personal protective clothing, manufactured with different materials based on hazards and end user requirements. Conventional protective clothing has impediments such as high weight, bulky nature, lack of mobility, heat stress, low heat dissipation, high physical stress, diminishing dexterity, diminishing scope of vision, lack of breathability, and reduced protection against pathogens and hazards. By virtue of the superlative properties of graphene, fabrics modified with this material can be an effective means to overcome these limitations and to improve properties such as mechanical strength, antibacterial activity, flame resistance, conductivity, and UV resistance. The limitations of conventional personal protective equipment are discussed, followed by necessary measures which might be taken to improve personal protective equipment (PPE), the unique properties of graphene, methods of graphene incorporation in fabrics, and the current research status and potential of graphene-modified performance textiles relevant to PPE.Entities:
Keywords: graphene; graphene/polymer composites; protective clothing; textiles
Year: 2019 PMID: 32313805 PMCID: PMC7161773 DOI: 10.1002/admi.201900622
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Mater Interfaces ISSN: 2196-7350 Impact factor: 6.147
Figure 1Schematic representation of multifunctional properties of graphene‐modified protective clothing.
Figure 2Pictorial representation of configuration of healthcare worker PPE during Ebola outbreak. Heavy weight, low air penetrability, low heat dissipation and insulation of these personal protective clothing caused significant discomfort and sweating.
Figure 3Pictorial representation of configuration of firefighter PPE. Heavy weight, inferior ventilation, and bulky nature makes it a burden for firefighters. Reproduced with permission.182 Copyright 2014, Springer Nature.
Overview of PPE research priorities based on emergency responder direction[qv: 1a]
| Research priorities | Problems faced by responders | Necessary measures | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ensuring comfort by diminishing physical strain |
Reduced mobility and muscle fatigue Heavy weight Low flexibility Agonizing sensation |
Reduction of bulky nature and heavy weight Bolstering air penetrability and breathability Increasing of ergonomic features | ||
| Develop effective protective clothing and guidelines to protect from biochemical hazards |
Infectious microorganisms Hot and humid environment Chemical attack Explosive weapons Internal heat accumulation Inferior ventilation Physiological disorder Sweat impregnation |
Ensure proper heat dissipation and transfer Ensure protection from microbial and chemical attack Designing PPE to avoid intrusion with responder activities Smart location monitoring system Training about different hazards and their protection |
Figure 4Conversion of graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) from graphene. Reproduced with permission.183 Copyright 2016, McGraw‐Hill Education.
Figure 5Antimicrobial behavior of graphene materials. Graphene materials can fight against bacteria through various mechanisms such as oxidative stress, hindrance of protein transfer, photothermal interaction, and membrane stress. Reproduced with permission.184 Copyright 2017, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 6Classification of graphene materials based on number of graphene layers, lateral dimension, and carbon–oxygen atomic ratio. Reproduced with permission.98 Copyright 2014, Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
Figure 7The fabrication paths of graphene‐modified polymer composites. Reproduced with permission.[qv: 55e] Copyright 2012, Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
Figure 8Schematic flow diagram for the development of multifunctional graphene modified fabrics.
Research performed on graphene modified fabrics/textile in relevant to the properties of smart or protective clothing
| Material composition | Method applied | Modified properties/ enhanced properties | Probable application | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two layers of Gr on SiC (0001) | Controlled sublimation method: experiments performed on buffer layer, 2L samples grown on SiC (0001) | Stiffness and hardness, which is comparable to diamond | Wear resistance protective coating |
|
| Nonwoven fabrics of Gr fibers | GO fibers were fabricated by wet‐spinning technique. Nonwoven graphene fabrics prepared by dispersing GO fibers in aqueous solvents and collecting by a mesh. Nonwoven then reduced by both chemically and thermally. | Electrical conductivity and thermal conductivity | Multifunctional fabrics |
|
| PET + Gr | Melt compounding (Brabender mixer) and compression molding | Electrical conductivity | Smart PPE | [qv: [130a]] |
| PET + rGO + polypyrrole | Coating of PET with GO was done immersion and drying followed by chemical reduction. Polypyrrole was coated on fabric by in situ synthesis. The composite was hot pressed to prepare film. | Surface chemistry and wetting behavior | Protective clothing | [qv: [130c]] |
| PET + rGO | Force penetration of GO into PET by suction filtration and chemical reduction of PET/GO | Electrical conductivity and thermochemical property | Smart clothing | [qv: [59b]] |
| Polyester + rGO | Coating of rGO onto polyester by plasma treatment and bovine serum albumin as adhesive | Conductivity | Smart clothing | [qv: [115a]] |
| Polyester + rGO | Coating of nonwoven polyester with liquid crystallite graphene oxide by immersion and drying | Conductivity and thermal activity | Electrically conductive textile | [qv: [130d]] |
| Polyester + rGO, polyester + Gr, polyester + Gr + Ag | Coating (immersion and drying) and in‐situ chemical reduction | Mechanical, electrical and UV protection | High performance textiles | [qv: [130b]] |
| Polyester + rGO | Grafting of polyester onto Gr via esterification and then chemical reduction | Electrical and thermal conductivity | Smart textile | [qv: [110b]] |
| PET fabric + rGO | 3‐Mercaptopropyltriethoxysilane functionalized rGO applied onto PET fabric under UV radiation for chemical bonding | Moisture absorption, perspiration and thermal conductivity | Sportswear |
|
| PET fabric + rGO + Ag‐nanoparticles | GO and AgNO3 were mixed as precursor and dip coating technique used to coat PET fabric. rGO–Ag nanoparticles were coated on fabric by in situ synthesis and chemical reduction using hydrazine. | Conductivity and durability in wash fastness | Smart textiles | [qv: [99a]] |
| Polyester + rGO + TiO2 | rGO coatings on polyester fabrics was done by plasma treatment of fabric, using BSA as adhesive and then chemical reduction. TiO2 dispersed on rGO coated fabric by immersion and drying. | Light absorption, conductivity, electroactivity, and photocatalytic properties | Smart textiles | [qv: [115b]] |
| Polyester + rGO + AgNO3 | GO was introduced to NaOH or ethylenediamine modified polyester fabric. AgNO3 was then added and reduced with GO using ascorbic acid and ammonia to find rGO/Ag nanocomposites coated on fabric. | Electrical resistivity and antibacterial property | New property textile |
|
| Nylon 12 + GO | Melt compounding and compression molding | Tensile strength, impact strength, elongation at break, and hardiness | Protective clothing | [qv: [140a]] |
| Nylon 12 + Gr | Dispersed sonicated and centrifuged graphene nanoparticles was coated onto nylon fabric by facile liquid‐based immersion at low sonication and low temperature condition followed by drying. | Electrical conductivity | Smart textiles |
|
| Nylon‐6 + rGO | Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as adhesive to wrap GO onto nylon. GO is then reduced chemically. | Electrical conductivity | E‐textiles | [qv: [133a]] |
| Nylon‐6 + sulfonated graphene | Using sulfonated graphene (SG) precursor, composite was fabricated by in situ hydrolytic ring‐opening polymerization of 3‐caprolactam followed by molding. | Thermal conductivity and mechanical property. | Thermal conductive systems |
|
| Aramid (Kevlar) + GO | Fiber was treated with plasma for surface functionalization. GO sheets was attached to the functionalized fabric chemically using both acidic and alkaline pH conditions. | Tensile strength, shear strength and adhesion property | Advanced high strength composites | [qv: [150a]] |
| Aramid + dopamine + GO | Due to adhesive nature dopamine was applied on to fiber to form coating of polydopamine followed by esterification of GO with polydopamine layer. Reaction temperature and composition were changed to adjust concentrations of new composite. | UV resistance, surface activity, thermal and mechanical property. | High strength fabrics | [qv: [150b]] |
| Para aramid + graphene + polyurethane |
| Laundering durability | Protective clothing |
|
| Aramid (Kevlar) + rGO + dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) | (DMSO) was used to produce aramid nanofibers (ANF) from aramid fibers. GO reacted with ANF by self‐assembly. Composite was obtained by vacuum filtration and then chemical reduction. | Electrical and mechanical properties | Electronic fabrics |
|
| Para‐aramid + graphene + WPU | Dip coating in graphene/WPU solution followed by hot pressing was used to prepare graphene modified para‐aramid fabrics. | Heat resistance and electric heating | Protective clothing |
|
| PVA + GO | Gel spinning followed by hot drawing technique used to manufacture GO/PVA nanocomposite fibers. | Tensile strength, antiultraviolet, and antibacterial | Textiles and biomedical | [qv: [168a]] |
| Cotton + rGO | Immersion and drying method were used to coat cotton fabrics by GO. Composite was reduced by heat in presence of nitrogen. | Electrical conductivity, UV protection and surface hydrophobicity | New performance textile |
|
| Cotton + rGO + silane coupling agent | Silane coupling agent was used to increase the bonding attraction between fabric and GO. Coupling agent modified fabric was dipped in GO solution and then dried. GO was reduced chemically using hydrazine hydrate. | Electrical conductivity | Smart textiles |
|
| Cotton + GO + TiO2 (Fe, N‐doped) | Dispersed, hydrothermally treated and dried TiO2+Fe+N+GO applied on to the fabrics by immersion and coating approach | Self‐cleaning, antimicrobial and biocompatible | Hospital clothing, sports attires, military uniform etc. | [qv: [122a]] |
| Cotton + rGO + TiO2 | Simple immersion and coating were used to coat GO onto cotton. Reduction of GO and nucleation of TiO2 was done by dipping GO coated fabric in solution mixture of titanium trichloride and poly(vinylpyrrolidone). | Photoactivity efficiency and antimicrobial activity | New performance photoactive, antimicrobial textiles | [qv: [122c]] |
| Cotton + GO (phosphorus‐ and nitrogen‐doped) | GO was doped with phosphorus and nitrogen using polyphosphoric acid and ammonia solution respectively. The they were used to coat the cotton fabrics. | Flame retardant ability | Flame retardant textile |
|
| Cotton + phosphorylated graphene oxides | One‐pot technique was applied for phosphorylation of GO (PGO). Cotton/PGO was prepared by immersion and drying technique. Polyethyleneimine electrolyte was used for self‐assembly. | Flame retardant ability | Fire retardant textile |
|
| Cellulosic/polyamide fabric + rGO | Exhaustion method was used to treat fabrics with GO. Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide use for long time and uniform adsorption of GO. GO‐treated fabric was reduced to reduced graphene oxide (rGO) with inorganic and organic reducing agents. | Electroconductivity, antimicrobial activity and UV protection | Multifunctional textile | [qv: [156a]] |
| Cotton/nylon (cationized) + rGO | For better interaction with GO, nylon was treated with 3‐chloro‐2‐hydroxy propyl trimethyl ammonium chloride for cationization. Fabric was coated by GO through exhaustion method. Composite was reduced chemically. | UV‐protection, bioactivity and electro conductivity | Multifunctional textile | [qv: [156b]] |
| Cotton + rGO | rGO was dispersed in | Electrical conductivity | Body warmer clothing | [qv: [156d]] |
| Cotton + Gr/rGO | Cotton fabric was modified by xerogel coatings with Gr and rGO using sol–gel method. Sodium lauryl sulfate was used as anionic surfactant and organosilicon sol was used for padding fabrics. | Antistatic properties | Protective cloths in explosive atmosphere. | [qv: [156e]] |
| Cotton + rGO | Cotton fabric was coated with GO. Reduction of GO and Fe3O4 nanocomposite was simultaneously developed on fabric surface by alkaline hydrolysis of magnetite precursors with NaOH. | Electrical resistivity, magnetic properties, antibacterial properties and UV blocking activity | Multifunctional smart textile | [qv: [156f]] |
| Cotton + GO | The GO was coated onto cotton fiber by simple adsorption, crosslinking via gamma radiation under N2 environment and chemical crosslinking ammonium persulfate as initiator. | Antibacterial property | Antibacterial textile | [qv: [82c]] |
| Cotton + rGO + antioxidant | GO was coated on to cotton by simple padding and then immersed in antioxidant solution. GO was reduced by thermal treatment. | Electrical conductivity and hydrophobicity | Smart textile |
|
| Cotton + rGO + | rGO‐polymeric | UV blocking, hydrophobicity, electrical conductivity and antimicrobial activity | Multifunctional antibacterial textile |
|
| Silk + rGO | Silk fabric was wrapped by GO through facile dip and dry method. GO coated fabric was then reduced chemically with sodiumhydrosulfite. | Electrical conductivity, antiultraviolet and water repellent | Medical care textile and E‐textile | [qv: [158b]] |
| Silk + rGO | Coating was done by dip and drying method followed by chemical reduction using | Flame retardant property | Flame retardant textile | [qv: [159a]] |
| Silk + GO + montmorillonoid | GO hydrosol doped with montmorillonoid and polyvinyl alcohol were coated on silk by coating machine. | Fire retardancy and ultraviolet resistance | Multifunctional flame resistance textile | [qv: [158a]] |
| Silk + rGO | GO was coated onto fabric by dry coating method using a scrubber. GO reduction was done by | Fire retardant and electrical conductivity | Smart textile | [qv: [159b]] |
| Silk + rGO + BSA or RSF protein | Silk fabric was wrapped with GO by dipping into GO solution. BSA and RSF protein was used as adhesive. It is the reduced thermally. | Electrical conductivity | Smart textiles |
|
| Wool + rGO + TiO2 | Wool was immersed into GO+TiO2 solutions, where hydrolysis of titanium isopropoxide and chemical conversion by sodium hydrosulfite occurred to form graphene/TiO2 nanocomposite. Then the composite dried and reduced chemically. | Antimicrobial action and self‐cleaning ability | Medical care textiles and smart textile. | [qv: [122b]] |
| Polypropylene + rGO | For lower surface tension GO was dispersed in | Electrical conductivity | Electronic textile |
|
| Calcium alginate + rGO | Sol–gel method was applied for the fabrication of rGO modified Calcium alginate composite. | Thermal stability and carbonization rate | Multifunctional flame retardant textile |
|
Abbreviations: Gr, graphene; SiC, silicon carbide; GO, graphene oxide; PET, polyethylene terephthalate; PPE, personal protective equipment; rGO, reduced graphene oxide; BSA, bovine serum albumin; SG, sulfonated graphene; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; ANF, aramid nanofibers; PVA, polyvinyl alcohol; WPU, waterborne polyurethane; PGO, phosphorylation of graphene oxide; UV, ultraviolet; RSF, regenerated silk fibroin.
Figure 9Interaction between GO and polyester fiber via electrostatic self‐assembly of BSA. Reproduced with permission.185 Copyright 2018, Springer Nature.
Figure 10IR photographs of a) untreated and b) reduced graphene oxide (rGO) treated PET fabrics within 50s. Reproduced with permission.121 Copyright 2018, Springer Nature.
Figure 11Preparation of polyamide fibers by polycondensation of dicarboxylic acids with diamines and ring‐opening polymerization of lactams.
Figure 12Change in a) thermal conductivity (λ) and b) normalized thermal conductivity (λ/λo) of nylon 6/sulfonated graphene composites with different % of sulfonated graphene. Reproduced with permission.143 Copyright 2016, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 13Single fiber a) tensile strength and b) interfacial shear strength (IFSS) of modified aramid fibers with or without modification by polydopamine (PDA) and graphene oxide (GO). Both fiber‐resin interfacial shear strength and tensile strength increased dramatically with modification by GO and PDA. Reproduced with permission.151 Copyright 2018, Springer Nature.
Figure 14Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of a) pure cotton, b) cotton/GO‐5L, c) cotton/GO‐10L, d) cotton/PGO‐5L, and e) cotton/PGO‐10L. Smooth SEM images indicate strong interaction and good compatibility of PGO with fabrics. Reproduced with permission.79 Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.
Figure 15Images of flame retardancy testing (5 s after ignition) of the pure and GO‐wrapped cotton fabrics. Reproduced with permission.79 Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.
Figure 16a) Antibacterial effectiveness of graphene‐modified cotton fabrics (100 µL elute was inoculated in agar plate). Inactivation efficacy tested using b) E. coli and c) B. subtilis. Reproduced with permission.[qv: 82c] Copyright 2013, Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
Figure 17SEM images of growth of E. coli bacteria on a) pure cotton, b) GO‐modified cotton fabrics by means of adsorption (cotton–GO), c) GO‐modified cotton fabrics by radiation‐induced crosslinking (cotton–rx‐GO), and d) GO‐modified cotton fabrics by means of chemical crosslinking (cotton–cx‐GO) (4 h incubation at 37 °C). a) The bacterial cells retained their usual morphology. b–d) Bacterial cell membranes were heavily damaged (arrow signs). Reproduced with permission.[qv: 82c] Copyright 2013, Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
Figure 18UV and visible light activation of TiO2 with graphene‐producing reactive oxygen species. Reproduced with permission.186 Copyright 2017, MDPI.
Strength and challenges of using graphene to modify personal protective clothing
| Strength | Challenges | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
|
Graphene and its derivatives have unique properties (Mechanical, thermal, electrical antibacterial, chemical, UV blocking etc.), which are essential in terms of PPE clothing. Oxygen bearing functional groups (epoxide, carbonyl, carboxyl and hydroxyl groups) in GO, permits improved surface interaction and bonding with polar polymer matrices.[qv: 55e,57] Hydrophilicity and dispersion ability of GO in different polymer matrices.[qv: 57b,59] rGO minimize application hindrance, reduce the defects and bring properties close to pristine graphene.[qv: 55e,63a] Graphene has shown its compatibility to be used with various fabrics (Polyester, polyamide, cotton, silk, etc.) and different methods. |
Difficulties in dispersion and interfacial interactions between textile and graphene to ensure stability and sustainability.[qv: 55e,63a] Sometimes inferior physical properties of graphene derivatives in composites than perfect graphene Aggregation problems of graphene sheets owing to not only large surface area but also van der Waals force[qv: 110b] Lack of viable high‐quality large‐scale production method and chemical stability |
Modification and functionalization of graphene and fiber surface for their better interfacial interaction and chemical bonding using different modifiers. Use of coupling agents, alkaline hydrolysis of fibers. Allowing electrostatic interaction using plasma treatment or amphiphilic adhesive. Using metal ions as crosslinking agents. Applying thiol–ene chemistry, grafting using esterification. |