Literature DB >> 25967066

Method for analyzing left-censored bioassay data in large cohort studies.

Jeri L Anderson1, A Iulian Apostoaei2.   

Abstract

In retrospective epidemiological studies of large cohorts of workers exposed to radioactive materials, it is often necessary to analyze large numbers of bioassay data sets containing censored values, or values recorded as less than a detection limit. Censored bioassay data create problems for all bioassay analysis methods, including analytical techniques based on least-squares regression to estimate intakes. A method is presented here that uses a simple empirically-derived equation for imputing replacement values for urine uranium concentration results reported as zero or less than a detection limit, that produces minimal bias in intakes estimated using least-square regression methods with the assumption of lognormally distributed measurement errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25967066     DOI: 10.1038/jes.2015.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  7 in total

1.  Statistical approaches to estimating mean water quality concentrations with detection limits.

Authors:  Robert H Shumway; Rahman S Azari; Masoud Kayhanian
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Estimation of internal exposure to uranium with uncertainty from urinalysis data using the InDEP computer code.

Authors:  Jeri L Anderson; A Iulian Apostoaei; Brian A Thomas
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Current status of bioassay procedures to detect and quantify previous exposures to radioactive materials. Bioassay Procedures Working Group.

Authors:  B Boecker; R Hall; K Inn; J Lawrence; P Ziemer; G Eisele; B Wachholz; W Burr
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  EURADOS-IDEAS GUIDELINES (VERSION 2) FOR THE ESTIMATION OF COMMITTED DOSES FROM INCORPORATION MONITORING DATA.

Authors:  C M Castellani; J W Marsh; C Hurtgen; E Blanchardon; P Bérard; A Giussani; M A Lopez
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.

Authors:  Paul Hewett; Gary H Ganser
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2007-10

Review 6.  Much ado about next to nothing: incorporating nondetects in science.

Authors:  Dennis Helsel
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-12-23

7.  Statistical methods for estimating the mean and variance from radionuclide data sets containing negative, unreported or less-than values.

Authors:  R O Gilbert; R R Kinnison
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 1.316

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Exposure to Recycled Uranium Contaminants in Gaseous Diffusion Plants.

Authors:  Jeri L Anderson; A Iulian Apostoaei; James H Yiin; Chih-Yu Tseng
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 0.972

2.  Comparison of statistic methods for censored personal exposure to RF-EMF data.

Authors:  Alberto Najera; Raquel Ramirez-Vazquez; Enrique Arribas; Jesus Gonzalez-Rubio
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Internal exposure to uranium in a pooled cohort of gaseous diffusion plant workers.

Authors:  Jeri L Anderson; A Iulian Apostoaei; James H Yiin; Donald A Fleming; Chih-Yu Tseng; Pi-Hsueh Chen
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Mortality in a combined cohort of uranium enrichment workers.

Authors:  James H Yiin; Jeri L Anderson; Robert D Daniels; Stephen J Bertke; Donald A Fleming; David J Tollerud; Chih-Yu Tseng; Pi-Hsueh Chen; Kathleen M Waters
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.214

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.