| Literature DB >> 25966798 |
Xin-Yu Bian1, Serge Maurice Mbadinga1, Yi-Fan Liu1, Shi-Zhong Yang1, Jin-Feng Liu1, Ru-Qiang Ye1, Ji-Dong Gu2, Bo-Zhong Mu1.
Abstract
Anaerobic degradation of alkanes in hydrocarbon-rich environments has been documented and different degradation strategies proposed, of which the most encountered one is fumarate addition mechanism, generating alkylsuccinates as specific biomarkers. However, little is known about the mechanisms of anaerobic degradation of alkanes in oil reservoirs, due to low concentrations of signature metabolites and lack of mass spectral characteristics to allow identification. In this work, we used a multidisciplinary approach combining metabolite profiling and selective gene assays to establish the biodegradation mechanism of alkanes in oil reservoirs. A total of twelve production fluids from three different oil reservoirs were collected and treated with alkali; organic acids were extracted, derivatized with ethanol to form ethyl esters and determined using GC-MS analysis. Collectively, signature metabolite alkylsuccinates of parent compounds from C1 to C8 together with their (putative) downstream metabolites were detected from these samples. Additionally, metabolites indicative of the anaerobic degradation of mono- and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (2-benzylsuccinate, naphthoate, 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-naphthoate) were also observed. The detection of alkylsuccinates and genes encoding for alkylsuccinate synthase shows that anaerobic degradation of alkanes via fumarate addition occurs in oil reservoirs. This work provides strong evidence on the in situ anaerobic biodegradation mechanisms of hydrocarbons by fumarate addition.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25966798 PMCID: PMC4429370 DOI: 10.1038/srep09801
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Proposed fumarate addition mechanism in anaerobic degradation of alkanes.
Physicochemical parameters of the samples collected from the twelve oil reservoir samples.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Na + (mg/L) | 1148.3 | 1173.9 | 868.1 | 962.2 | 9577.2 | 4235.3 | 8750.2 | 3909.2 | 3801.4 | 6218.7 | 4196 | 5399.0 |
| NH4 + (mg/L) | 375.0 | 65.5 | 1109.7 | 1040.3 | 963.9 | 44.0 | n. d. | 1139.9 | 85.5 | 61.1 | n. d. | n. d. |
| Cl– (mg/L) | 306.7 | 428.3 | 445.9 | 423.7 | 21394.5 | 4500 | 13178.7 | 8418.5 | 6825.8 | 12575.17 | 2000 | 5336 |
| SO42– (mg/L) | 91.0 | 80.7 | n. d. | 42.6 | 2676.2 | 6513.5 | 82.3 | 335.3 | 2050.6 | 2392.4 | 124.8 | 7.7 |
*n. d.: not detectable
Signature metabolites of anaerobic alkanes degradation detected in production fluid samples.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||||
| C1 | + | |||||||||||
| C2 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||
| C3 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||
| C4 | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||
| C5 | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||
| C6 | + | + | + | |||||||||
| C7 | + | + | ||||||||||
| C8 | + | + | ||||||||||
| Benzylsuccinate | + | |||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Ethylmalonate | + | |||||||||||
| Butylmalonate | + | + | ||||||||||
| 2-(methylpentyl)malonate | + | |||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Naphthoate | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||
| 5,6,7,8-tetrahydronaphthoate | + | + | ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Formate | + | |||||||||||
| Acetate | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||
| Propionate | + | + | ||||||||||
| 2-methylpropionate | + | |||||||||||
| Butyrate | + | + | + | + | ||||||||
| 1-methylbutyrate | + | + | + | |||||||||
| Hydroxycaproate | + | + | ||||||||||
| Octanoate | + | |||||||||||
| 4-octenoate | + | + | + | + | ||||||||
| 3-nonenoate | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||
| Nonanoate | + | |||||||||||
| Laurate | + | + | + | |||||||||
| 9-hexadecenoate | + | + | ||||||||||
| Myristate | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||
| 3-hydroxytridecanoate | + | |||||||||||
| Palmitate | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Oleate | + | + | + | |||||||||
| Stearate | + | + | + | + | ||||||||
“+”: detected.
Figure 2(a) The total ion chromatogram of fatty acid ethyl esters from production fluid H4; (b) Selected ion chromatogram of ethyl esters from production fluid H4 containing fragments m/z 174 and 128 (The most abundant peak in (a) is 1-chlorohexadecane that serves as the internal standard).
Figure 3Mass spectra of some detected diethyl alkylsuccinates in sample H4.
Figure 4Putative anaerobic degradation pathway of hydrocarbons: (a) alkane, (b) toluene, (c) naphthalene or 2-methylnaphthalene. Detected organic acids are marked in red, and putative metabolites of anaerobic degradation of alkanes via fumarate addition are listed at four stages, namely fumarate addition, C-skeleton re-arrangement, decarboxylation and further β-oxidation.
Figure 5Phylogenetic tree of deduced assA/masD gene sequences amplified from DNAs extracted from the oil reservoir production fluid samples and closely related sequences from the GenBank database. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted with MEGA6 software. The topology of the tree shown was obtained with the neighbor-joining method and the Poisson correction. Values below 70% are not shown. The database was accessed on between July and August 2014. Scale bar = 10% amino acid substitution.