Kofi A Anie1, John Green. 1. Haematology and Sickle Cell Centre, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, Central Middlesex Hospital, Acton Lane, London, UK, NW10 7NS.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease comprises a group of genetic blood disorders. It occurs when the sickle haemoglobin gene is inherited from both parents. The effects of the condition are: varying degrees of anaemia which, if severe, can reduce mobility; a tendency for small blood capillaries to become blocked causing pain in muscle and bone commonly known as 'crises'; damage to major organs such as the spleen, liver, kidneys, and lungs; and increased vulnerability to severe infections. There are both medical and non-medical complications, and treatment is usually symptomatic and palliative in nature. Psychological interventions for individuals with sickle cell disease might complement current medical treatment, and studies of their efficacy have yielded encouraging results. This is an update of a previously published Cochrane Review. OBJECTIVES: To examine the evidence that psychological interventions improve the ability of people with sickle cell disease to cope with their condition. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register, which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and the Internet, handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings.Date of the most recent search of the Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register: 17 February 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing psychological interventions with no (psychological) intervention in people with sickle cell disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. MAIN RESULTS: Twelve studies were identified in the searches and seven of these were eligible for inclusion in the review. Five studies, involving 260 participants, provided data for analysis. One study showed that cognitive behaviour therapy significantly reduced the affective component of pain (feelings about pain), mean difference -0.99 (95% confidence interval -1.62 to -0.36), but not the sensory component (pain intensity), mean difference 0.00 (95% confidence interval -9.39 to 9.39). One study of family psycho-education was not associated with a reduction in depression. Another study evaluating cognitive behavioural therapy had inconclusive results for the assessment of coping strategies, and showed no difference between groups assessed on health service utilisation. In addition, family home-based cognitive behavioural therapy did not show any difference compared to disease education. One study of patient education on health beliefs showed a significant improvement in attitudes towards health workers, mean difference -4.39 (95% CI -6.45 to -2.33) and medication, mean difference -1.74 (95% CI -2.98 to -0.50). Nonetheless, these results may not apply across all ages, severity of sickle cell disease, types of pain (acute or chronic), or setting. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for the efficacy of psychological therapies in sickle cell disease is currently limited. This systematic review has clearly identified the need for well-designed, adequately-powered, multicentre randomised controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of specific interventions in sickle cell disease.
BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease comprises a group of genetic blood disorders. It occurs when the sickle haemoglobin gene is inherited from both parents. The effects of the condition are: varying degrees of anaemia which, if severe, can reduce mobility; a tendency for small blood capillaries to become blocked causing pain in muscle and bone commonly known as 'crises'; damage to major organs such as the spleen, liver, kidneys, and lungs; and increased vulnerability to severe infections. There are both medical and non-medical complications, and treatment is usually symptomatic and palliative in nature. Psychological interventions for individuals with sickle cell disease might complement current medical treatment, and studies of their efficacy have yielded encouraging results. This is an update of a previously published Cochrane Review. OBJECTIVES: To examine the evidence that psychological interventions improve the ability of people with sickle cell disease to cope with their condition. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register, which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and the Internet, handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings.Date of the most recent search of the Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register: 17 February 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing psychological interventions with no (psychological) intervention in people with sickle cell disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. MAIN RESULTS: Twelve studies were identified in the searches and seven of these were eligible for inclusion in the review. Five studies, involving 260 participants, provided data for analysis. One study showed that cognitive behaviour therapy significantly reduced the affective component of pain (feelings about pain), mean difference -0.99 (95% confidence interval -1.62 to -0.36), but not the sensory component (pain intensity), mean difference 0.00 (95% confidence interval -9.39 to 9.39). One study of family psycho-education was not associated with a reduction in depression. Another study evaluating cognitive behavioural therapy had inconclusive results for the assessment of coping strategies, and showed no difference between groups assessed on health service utilisation. In addition, family home-based cognitive behavioural therapy did not show any difference compared to disease education. One study of patient education on health beliefs showed a significant improvement in attitudes towards health workers, mean difference -4.39 (95% CI -6.45 to -2.33) and medication, mean difference -1.74 (95% CI -2.98 to -0.50). Nonetheless, these results may not apply across all ages, severity of sickle cell disease, types of pain (acute or chronic), or setting. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for the efficacy of psychological therapies in sickle cell disease is currently limited. This systematic review has clearly identified the need for well-designed, adequately-powered, multicentre randomised controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of specific interventions in sickle cell disease.
Authors: K M Gil; J J Wilson; J L Edens; D A Webster; M A Abrams; E Orringer; M Grant; W C Clark; M N Janal Journal: Health Psychol Date: 1996-01 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: O S Platt; B D Thorington; D J Brambilla; P F Milner; W F Rosse; E Vichinsky; T R Kinney Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-07-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ghida Aljuburi; Anthony A Laverty; Stuart A Green; Karen J Phekoo; Ricky Banarsee; N V Ogo Okoye; Derek Bell; Azeem Majeed Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 2.341
Authors: Barbara P Yawn; George R Buchanan; Araba N Afenyi-Annan; Samir K Ballas; Kathryn L Hassell; Andra H James; Lanetta Jordan; Sophie M Lanzkron; Richard Lottenberg; William J Savage; Paula J Tanabe; Russell E Ware; M Hassan Murad; Jonathan C Goldsmith; Eduardo Ortiz; Robinson Fulwood; Ann Horton; Joylene John-Sowah Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Tonya M Palermo; William T Zempsky; Carlton D Dampier; Chitra Lalloo; Amos S Hundert; Lexa K Murphy; Nitya Bakshi; Jennifer N Stinson Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Sherif M Badawy; Kaleab Z Abebe; Charlotte A Reichman; Grace Checo; Megan E Hamm; Jennifer Stinson; Chitra Lalloo; Patrick Carroll; Santosh L Saraf; Victor R Gordeuk; Payal Desai; Nirmish Shah; Darla Liles; Cassandra Trimnell; Charles R Jonassaint Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2021-05-14