| Literature DB >> 25966025 |
Karin A L Mueller1, Iris I Mueller1, David Eppler1, Christine S Zuern1, Peter Seizer1, Ulrich Kramer2, Ina Koetter3, Martin Roecken4, Reinhard Kandolf5, Meinrad Gawaz1, Tobias Geisler1, Joerg C Henes3, Karin Klingel5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiac involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is associated with a variable phenotype including heart failure, arrhythmias and pulmonary hypertension. The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical characteristics, histopathological findings and outcome of patients with SSc and a clinical phenotype suggesting cardiac involvement. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25966025 PMCID: PMC4428754 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126707
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Histopathological and immunohistological findings in the myocardium of patients with systemic sclerosis and cardiac involvement.
A: This image is representative for a biopsy with severe inflammation (grade 4), which is characterized by the presence of numerous CD3+ T lymphocytes and MHC II+ macrophages. In addition, a grade 3 fibrosis demonstrates severe cardiac remodeling in this patient. B: In the left picture, an overview of an endomyocardial biopsy is presented revealing two arterioles with pronounced changes of the architecture of the vessel walls including fibrosis. Immunohistological staining with SM-actin confirms a considerable hyperplasia of smooth muscle in the vessel. C: Fig 1C depicts normal heart tissue with Masson’s Trichrome staining on the left side from autopsy material of a patient, who died during an accident. Myocardial fibrosis (green area) was 2%. No inflammation (CD3+ T cells or MHC II+ cells) was detected within the myocardium, as shown in the immunohistochemistry on the right panel.
Patients’ demographics, treatment, cardiac and inflammatory markers.
|
|
|
|---|---|
|
| |
| Mean age, y ± SD | 46.0±11.0 |
| Gender, female | 8 (32%) |
| BMI | 23.4±4.4 |
| NYHA functional class ≥ II | 19 (76%) |
| NYHA functional class > II | 7 (28%) |
| Subtype (lc/dc) | 7 (28%)/18 (72%) |
| Median disease duration, y | 2 (0.5–10) |
| Median mRSS | 16 (3–34) |
| Renal involvement | 2 (8%) |
| Pulmonary fibrosis (hrCT) | 19 (76%) |
| Oesophageal dysfunction | 15 (60%) |
| Digital ulcers | 16 (64%) |
| Myositis | 11 (44%) |
| Arterial hypertension | 5 (20%) |
| Blood pressure at enrollment | |
| - Systolic BP (mmHg) | 119.6 ± 21.5 |
| - Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 71.1 ± 10.4 |
| - MAP (mmHg) | 87.3 ± 13.5 |
| Diabetes mellitus type 2 | 1 (4%) |
| Hyperlipidemia | 5 (20%) |
| - Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 163.0 ± 94.2 |
| - Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 198.1 ± 48.3 |
| - HDL (mg/dl) | 51.8 ± 18.9 |
| - LDL (mg/dl) | 124 ± 31.1 |
| Renal crisis | 1 (4%) |
|
| |
| ß-blockers | 14 (56%) |
| ACE-inhibitors | 14 (56%) |
| AT1-antagonists | 5 (20%) |
| Diuretics | 11 (44%) |
| Aldosterone antagonists | 10 (40%) |
|
| |
| Prednisolon | 14 (56%) |
| Cyclophosphamid | 24 (96%) |
| Ciclosporin | 2 (8%) |
| Mycophenolat | 15 (60%) |
| Rituximab | 6 (24%) |
| Methotrexat | 5 (20%) |
| Azathioprin | 3 (12%) |
|
| |
| Prednisolon | 10 (40%) |
| Cyclophosphamid | 11 (44%) |
| Ciclosporin | 0 (0%) |
| Mycophenolat | 4 (16%) |
| Rituximab | 1 (4%) |
| Methotrexat | 1 (4%) |
| Azathioprin | 0 (0%) |
|
| |
| Sildenafil | 4 (14%) |
|
| |
| Bosentan | 11 (44%) |
|
| |
| BNP (ng/l) | 117.5±111.7 |
| TnI (μg/l) | 0.79±1.1 |
| CK (U/l) | 407.3±529.7 |
|
| |
| ANA positive | 20 (80%) |
| Scl-70 positive | 13 (52%) |
| pmScl positive | 1 (4%) |
| ACA positive | 2 (8%) |
| WBC (n/μl) | 10178±2972 |
| ESR (mm/h) | 17.0±20.8 |
| CRP (mg/dl) | 2.3±3.5 |
Values are n (%) or mean±standard deviation. ACA – Anti-centromere antibody, ACE inhibitors – angiotensin converting enzyme, ANA – antinuclear antibodies, AT1-antagonists – angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist, BMI – body mass index, BNP – b-type natriuretic peptide (normal value < 100ng/l), BP – blood pressure, CRP – C-reactive protein (normal value < 0.5mg/dl), cholesterol—(normal value < 200mg/dl), CK – creatine kinase (normal value < 190U/l), Dc – diffuse cutaneous, dl – deciliters, ESR –erythrocyte sedimentation rate (normal value < 20mm/h), h – hour, HDL – high density lipoprotein (normal value < 40mg/dl), hrCT – high resolution computed tomography, l – liters, lc – limited cutaneous, LDL—low density lipoprotein (normal value < 160mg/dl), mg – milligrams, MAP – mean arterial pressure, mmHg – millimeter of mercury, mRSS – modified Rodnan Skin Score, μg – micrograms, μl – microliters, n – number, ng – nanograms, NYHA – New York Heart Association, pmScl—polymyositis scleroderma antibody, Scl-70 – topoisomerase I, SD – standard deviation, TnI –troponin I (normal value < 0.03µg/l), triglycerides—(normal value < 200mg/dl), U – units, WBC – white blood cells (normal value < 10.000n/μl), y – years. *Continuous variables were compared using t- test, categorical data were analyzed by chi-square test.
Cardiac work up.
|
|
|
| LVEF (%) | 54.1±9.0 |
| LVEDD (mm) | 46.7±5.9 |
| RV-function, normal | 23 (92%) |
| RV-function, moderately impaired | 1 (4%) |
| RV-function, severely impaired | 1 (4%) |
| RVEDD (mm) | 31.3±5.3 |
| Systolic PAP (mmHg) | 36.1±13.1 |
|
|
|
| PAmean (mmHg) | 21.1±8.7 |
|
|
|
| FVC (l) | 3.1±1.1 |
| FVC (%) | 70.8±20.7 |
|
|
|
| No ventricular ectopy | 6 (33%) |
| Couplets and triplets | 7 (39%) |
| Ventricular salvos or nsVTs | 5 (28%) |
|
| |
|
| N = 25 |
| No inflammation | 1 (3.8%) |
| Single inflammatory cells | 10 (38.5%) |
| Some foci of inflammation | 8 (30.8%) |
| Several foci of inflammation | 4 (15.4%) |
| Pronounced inflammation | 2 (7.7%) |
|
| N = 25 |
| CD3 | 14 (56%) |
| CD68 | 19 (76%) |
| MHC II | 20 (80%) |
|
| N = 25 |
| EV | 1 (4%) |
| PVB19 | 2 (8%) |
| EBV | 2 (8%) |
| HHV 6 | 1 (4%) |
Values are n (%) or mean±standard deviation. CD – cluster of differentiation, EV – enteroviruses, EBV – Epstein-Barr virus, FVC – functional vital capacity, h – hour, HHV 6 – Human herpesvirus 6, LVEDD – left ventricular enddiastolic diameter, LVEF—left ventricular ejection fraction, MHC II – major histocompatibility complex class II, mm – milimeters, mmHg – milimeters of mercury, nsVTs—non sustained ventricular tachycardia, PAmean—mean pulmonary arterial pressure measured in right heart catheterization, PAP—pulmonary artery pressure,in echocardiography, PVB19—Parvovirus B19, RV—right ventricular, RVEDD – right ventricular enddiastolic diameter, VES – ventricular extrasystoles. *Continuous variables were compared using t- test, categorical data were analyzed by chi-square test.
Clinical outcome during a mean follow-up of 22.5 months.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Combined endpoint | 7 (28%) |
| All-cause death | 6 (23.1%) |
| Cardiovascular death | 4 (66.7%) |
| Decompensation due to HF | 0 (0%) |
| ICD-Shock | 3 (11.5%) |
Values are n (%). HF – heart failure, ICD – implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
* combination of all-cause death, decompensation due to heart failure and arrhythmic endpoints.
Fig 2Patients with an event (cardiovascular death, arrhythmic endpoints defined as appropriate discharge of ICD or rehospitalization due to heart failure) during follow up showed a higher grade of inflammation and a higher degree of fibrosis.
A: The event rate was associated with the degree of inflammation by trend. While patients with an inflammation grade 0 or 1 showed an event rate of 18.2%, the subgroup of patients with an inflammation grade 2 presented with an event rate of 25% versus an event rate of 50% in the subgroup of patients with an inflammation grade 3 and 4, respectively (p = 0.193). B: The event rate was associated with the degree of fibrosis by trend. While patients with fibrosis grade 1 showed an event rate of 11%, the subgroup of patients with fibrosis grade 2 and 3 presented with an event rate of 33% and 42% respectively (p = 0.160).