Standard transmission electron microscopy nanoparticle sample preparation generally requires the complete removal of the suspending liquid. Drying often introduces artifacts, which can obscure the state of the dispersion prior to drying and preclude automated image analysis typically used to obtain number-weighted particle size distribution. Here we present a straightforward protocol for prevention of the onset of drying artifacts, thereby allowing the preservation of in-situ colloidal features of nanoparticles during TEM sample preparation. This is achieved by adding a suitable macromolecular agent to the suspension. Both research- and economically-relevant particles with high polydispersity and/or shape anisotropy are easily characterized following our approach (http://bsa.bionanomaterials.ch), which allows for rapid and quantitative classification in terms of dimensionality and size: features that are major targets of European Union recommendations and legislation.
Standard transmission electron microscopy nanoparticle sample preparation generally requires the complete removal of the suspending liquid. Drying often introduces artifacts, which can obscure the state of the dispersion prior to drying and preclude automated image analysis typically used to obtain number-weighted particle size distribution. Here we present a straightforward protocol for prevention of the onset of drying artifacts, thereby allowing the preservation of in-situ colloidal features of nanoparticles during TEM sample preparation. This is achieved by adding a suitable macromolecular agent to the suspension. Both research- and economically-relevant particles with high polydispersity and/or shape anisotropy are easily characterized following our approach (http://bsa.bionanomaterials.ch), which allows for rapid and quantitative classification in terms of dimensionality and size: features that are major targets of European Union recommendations and legislation.
Nanomaterials are present in nearly all segments of modern life, including electronics,
cosmetics, food products, and healthcare. In an attempt to ensure the safety of all
applications of nanomaterials in products, the European Commission has issued a
definition of the term ‘nanomaterial’ to be used in all European
Union legislation.1 Essentially, a “nanomaterial
[is] a natural, incidental or manufactured material containing
particles, in an unbound state or as an aggregate or as an agglomerate and where,
for 50 % or more of the particles one or more external dimensions is in the size range 1
nm – 100
nm”. With this definition, the median of the number-weighted size
distribution was established as a definitive parameter in the legislation of
nanomaterials. Electron microscopy is a so-called counting method, which determines
individual nanoparticle size and can be used to construct the required number-weighted
size distributions. However, this technique is frequently plagued with issues related to
artifacts, statistical reliability and interpretation.2 Drying steps,
unavoidable during sample preparation, can result in non-uniform particle deposition and
particle aggregation.3 Characterizing commercially-relevant materials,
which often have highly non-uniform sizes and shapes, is particularly challenging. Here
we describe a simple and almost universally-applicable approach that can eliminate
artifacts found in conventional TEM micrographs taken for the analysis of suspended
particulate nanomaterials.Scanning (SEM) or transmission electron microscopes (TEM) are standard equipment in many
companies and research facilities, and their use is continually expanding. Measurements
are typically performed in high-vacuum chambers on dry samples. TEM sample preparation
typically consists of drop-casting and drying a particle suspension on a TEM grid. This
process often results in the formation of nanoparticle aggregates456
located in segregated patches at the perimeter of the dried droplet, which can be
explained by surface dewetting7 and the so-called
‘coffee-ring’ effect.3 The unambiguous
discrimination between ‘true’ aggregates present in the sample and
‘formed’ aggregates, which were produced during sample preparation
is very challenging in standard TEM. CryoTEM and liquid-cell TEM are particularly
interesting developments that in principle may overcome these issues.8910111213 However, in practice, these techniques represent a
rather expensive class of electron microscopy that require utmost delicacy and are
time-consuming. Furthermore, due to the usually limited number of counting events,
sample sizes are often not large enough for statistical significance. The method we
present here is straightforward, cost-effective, and does not require specialist
expertise. By considerably improving the drop-casting deposition pattern –
free from ex situ aggregates and clusters – we were able to capture the
native, colloidal dispersion state, enabling high-throughput yet accurate quantitative
TEM characterization. The efficacy of the technique was confirmed by UV-Vis spectroscopy
and light scattering, which both analyze the true unaltered suspension.The approach relies on the stabilization of individual particles against aggregation,
mitigating dewetting, and fortifying Marangoni flow.14 All this can be
easily achieved in one step by mixing the particle suspension with a dilute solution of
a suitable macromolecular agent at the appropriate concentration ratio. Bovine serum
albumin (BSA) was chosen as the macromolecular agent. Although BSA is not necessarily
the only possible choice, it was chosen as it is cheap, widely available and
well-studied.
Results
Spherical gold nanoparticles
Model nanoparticles, i.e. gold nanoparticles (Au NPs), were used to introduce and
validate the approach before applying it to more challenging and economically
important nanopowders (e.g. silica (SiO2), titanium dioxide
(TiO2), zinc oxide (ZnO) and copper carbonate nanoparticles, and
highly anisotropic and polydisperse cellulose nanocrystals, t-CNCs). We
therefore analyzed TEM micrographs of Au NPs and validated the data
independently by UV-Vis spectroscopy and dynamic light scattering (DLS). We
distinguished single particles from ex situ aggregates and always compared
samples prepared in the standard manner to those prepared using our method,
which consisted of mixing an aqueous solution of BSA with the Au NPs, drop
casting the suspension onto the TEM grid, and finally letting it dry under
ambient conditions. Figure 1 shows TEM micrographs of
drop-cast samples of Au NPs suspended without BSA (Figure
1a), with BSA but well below the optimal concentration (Figure 1b), and with BSA at the optimal concentration (Figure 1c). This optimal concentration of the BSA solution
(C0, mass/vol.) was estimated via equation
(1), where CR is
the mass-based concentration of the particle suspension, the volume of the particle suspension and BSA
solution, respectively, ρR the mass density of the
nanoparticles, R the expected size (e.g. for spheres the radius) of the
nanoparticles, MBSA the molar mass of BSA, and α the area
occupied by one surface-adsorbed BSA molecule. The derivation of equation (1) is given in the Supplementary Information
(SI 1). A rough estimate of the expected particle size is sufficient
to prepare the sample and an interactive online platform for calculating the
optimal BSA concentration is available: http://bsa.bionanomaterials.ch. In the Supplementary Information, we also provide a straightforward
graphical computational tool (SI 1.3, Nomogram) that enables
to evaluate equation (1) without the use of e.g. a
calculator.
Figure 1
TEM micrographs of drop-cast samples of suspended Au NPs.
TEM micrographs of drop-cast samples of suspended Au NPs without BSA
(a), with BSA but well below the optimal concentration
(b), and with BSA at the optimal concentration (c). The
magnified view (middle) - the right side of which is bi-leveled for high
contrast - shows aggregation due to van der Waals forces (a),
aggregation also due to protein bridging (b), and stability as single
particles owing to the presence of an intact BSA
‘shield’ (c).
As expected, conventional sample preparation resulted in very densely packed
aggregates (Figure 1a), which were accumulated mostly in
the final perimeter area of the dried droplet. Even a small amount of BSA
(∼C0/20) was found to influence the deposition
pattern, however, protein bridging1516 (i.e. the simultaneous
adsorption of the protein onto more than one particle) likely dominated the
inter-particle interactions and led to the formation of large clusters (Figure 1b). Individual particles can be easily identified in
these clusters even at this low BSA level. Finally, the micrograph of the sample
prepared with the optimal amount of BSA (Figure 1c) shows
well-distributed single particles without any sign of aggregation. The
difference between these drop-cast samples is even clearer when quantifying the
analysis of these micrographs. The micrographs were analyzed by fitting ellipses
around the particles, following previously reported protocols.1718 Each ellipse is defined by two parameters: the long axis
(2a) and the aspect ratio (δ ≤ 1), which is calculated as
the ratio of the lengths of the long and short axes. The equivalent radius of
these spherical particles may be approximated by half the length of the long
axis, and particle analyses are summarized in histograms: both a and
δ are highly skewed to the right when the sample is overwhelmed with
artifacts (Figure 1a and 1b).
However, when the Au NPs were prepared with the optimal amount of BSA, the TEM
histogram shows a narrow distribution (Figure 1c) with an
average radius of 8.1 nm and a polydispersity index of 0.2 (SD / mean). The
average aspect ratio is δ = 1.12 with a small dispersion of 0.1 (SD /
mean).
Preserving in situ colloidal dispersion state
In the next step, we increased the complexity of the particle system and Au NPs
were deliberately aggregated prior to TEM sample preparation using
centrifugation (3500 g for 10 min.). This concentrated suspension was then
diluted with a 0.05 wt% citrate solution. Our aim was to create
‘low-degree’ aggregates already present in the suspended
state. These are referred to as in situ aggregates in this manuscript. In this
case, nontrivial particle morphology can be expected, including single particles
next to multiplets. Indeed, this was confirmed by TEM. The micrographs clearly
show that particle doublets, triplets, quartets, etc. were present in addition
to single particles (Figure 2a and 2b). As anticipated, larger aggregates showed arbitrary
morphologies: between chain-like oligomers and close-packed globules several
shapes and types of packing were observed. Analysis of TEM micrographs revealed
that the dimensionality and size of these in situ aggregates varied over a wide
range (Figure 2c). The occurrence of existing combinations
of aspect ratio and size can be summarized in a two-dimensional joint histogram
(Figure 2d). Such information allows rapid and
quantitative classification in terms of dimensionality and size: features that
are in the focus of EU recommendations and legislation.119
Figure 2
TEM analysis of in situ aggregates of Au NPs.
Panel (a) and (b) depict representative TEM micrographs (width:
2.68 μm) and close-up views of typical in situ aggregates of Au
NPs. Panel c shows the result of counting 2200 single and
pre-aggregated particles. Particles were classified in terms of long axis
(2a) and aspect ratio (δ), following the same approach as for
Figure 1(a–c). Panel (d)
depicts the result summarized into a two-dimensional histogram quantifying
the occurrence of existing combinations of aspect ratio and size.
To confirm that sample preparation using BSA did preserve the in situ colloidal
dispersion state in terms of size and dimensionality, both the single and in
situ aggregated Au NPs were analyzed also in their suspended native state using
UV-Vis and DLS (Figure 3). These truly in situ
measurements were then compared to the TEM results of samples prepared with the
optimal concentration of BSA. For single Au NPs, the particle size estimated
from the UV-Vis spectrum (Figure 3), in which the center
position of the localized surface plasmon resonance is at
λc = 520.7 nm, indicating a particle radius of
8–9 nm,20 agrees very well with the result obtained
from TEM. The UV-Vis spectrum of in situ aggregated Au NPs displayed the
signatures of predominantly low-degree aggregates: a clear red-shift of the
center position as well as an increase in the extinction towards longer
wavelengths. DLS provided further proof of the preserved suspended state. Based
on particles observed and counted in TEM micrographs, correlation functions were
reconstructed (Figure 3, right side, dashed lines) and
plotted over correlation functions recorded from actual suspensions of single
and in situ aggregated NPs prior to drop casting. The overall agreement between
the results of these considerably distinct approaches is excellent. The
reconstruction of correlation functions from TEM analysis is explained in detail
in the Supplementary Information (SI 2).
Figure 3
In situ characterization of Au NPs.
UV-Vis extinction spectra (left) and dynamic depolarized light scattering
results (right, empty circles) of single and in situ aggregated NPs. The
dashed lines are correlation functions reconstructed from TEM analysis of
BSA-prepared samples (Supplementary Information, SI
2).
Real-life nanomaterials
We then selected five representative particulate nanomaterials to test the
efficacy of our method. We chose nanopowders which are economically relevant,
produced on large scales, or which show large polydispersity and/or shape
anisotropy, ensuring that a large zeta potential range was covered (from
−55 mV to +46 mV). As such, we investigated SiO2, Cu,
TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles, in addition to cellulose nanocrystals
derived from tunicate styela clava (t-CNCs).2122 Sample
preparation generally followed the protocol described above for the Au NPs.
Non-spherical particles (e.g. ZnO) required a slight adaptation of the method
(Supplementary Information SI 1.1). TEM micrographs
showed that our concept of sample preparation is also applicable to much more
complex particulate nanomaterials (Figure 4). The
micrographs of the samples without BSA show highly aggregated structures on the
TEM grids for all of the various nanomaterials. Utilizing BSA, however, enabled
automated image analysis of the nanoparticles. Even cellulose nanocrystals,
which are the most complex materials used in this study and whose TEM
micrographs are strongly affected during the drying process in the absence of
BSA, become accessible for quantitative analysis. TEM proved to be particularly
relevant for this material since in situ characterization (e.g. light
scattering) of CNCs is very challenging due to the fiber-like shape of cellulose
nanocrystals and their considerable polydispersity in both length and width. The
developed BSA protocol was also found to be successful over the entire zeta
potential range. In particular, the neutral and positively charged particles
(TiO2, ZnO) show extremely good results with BSA, as their
aggregation and accumulation upon drying without BSA makes the resulting
micrographs almost impossible to analyze via standard TEM. Using DLS, these
samples were also analyzed in their suspended native state and the result was
compared to that of TEM. Based on particles observed and counted in TEM
micrographs, correlation functions were reconstructed and plotted over
correlation functions recorded from the suspensions prior to drop casting (Supplementary Information, Figure SI 6). Similarly to the
case of Au NPs, the results of these two distinct techniques agree very
well.
Figure 4
Micrographs of various suspended nanopowders deposited onto the TEM grid
without and with BSA.
The result of image analysis is summarized by the histograms. The Zeta
potential, relevant for describing the effective surface charge, increases
from top to bottom.
Particle deposition and BSA coating
Figure 5 illustrates an aqueous drop and the dominant
processes influencing the deposition pattern of suspended particles onto a
hydrophobic surface. Increasing particle concentration, attractive
inter-particle forces and a dewetting grid surface negatively affect the
deposition pattern of the particles on the TEM grids. The presence of the right
concentration of BSA strongly influences these three parameters, resulting in
drop-cast samples of good quality. Attractive inter-particle forces lead to
aggregation,456 which is enhanced by drying as the
particle concentration increases.23 Yet, aggregation can be
prevented by stabilizing the colloidal particles, deploying effects such as
steric hindrance or surface charge. BSA, if covering the entire surface of the
particles, promotes stability, since the protein adsorbed onto the surface has
been shown to form a thin protective shell242526 that shields
the van der Waals interactions between particles.27 Thus, even as
the particle concentration continuously increases during drying, the protein
shell maintains the colloidal stability and prevents aggregation. The overall
number of particles and corresponding surface area can be easily estimated via
the mass-based concentration of the particle suspension, and thus the number of
BSA molecules required to form a monolayer around each particle can be
calculated (Supplementary Information, S1). Monolayer
coverage was based on our findings that show that at least one complete layer of
BSA is required to prevent nanoparticles from aggregation induced by polymer
bridging (Figure 1b). This was supported by previous
studies, which have shown that BSA can form a regular monolayer on
citrate-stabilized gold NPs via an electrostatic mechanism.2829
Electrostatic interactions are the primary driving force for the adsorption, and
it has been previously shown that protein conformation and charge distribution
guide the protein-particle interaction.38 As a consequence, NPs
can interact with oppositely charged regions in a protein, even if both the NPs
and the proteins display a net positive or net negative charge.38
Figure 5
Illustration of an aqueous drop and the dominant processes influencing the
deposition pattern of suspended particles onto a hydrophobic surface.
Red arrows indicate effective particle flow due to the coffee ring effect.
Yellow lines show counter flow introduced by the Marangoni flow.
The model can be easily generalized for non-spherical as well as polydisperse
particles. For a given particle mass, any deviation from the spherical shape
increases the surface area, and for any given shape, this increased surface area
can be estimated. However, calculating the surface area of highly irregular
particles is not trivial. As an alternative, we propose to add more BSA than
what was calculated for spheres with smooth surfaces. This simplistic approach
was tested using gold NPs (15 nm) and SiO2 NPs (100 nm), and it was
found that up to an eightfold increase of the BSA concentration no negative
influence (with respect to image quality) was observed on the micrograph. Beyond
this value, BSA stains were clearly visible in the TEM micrographs, yet the
sample deposition remained good (Supplementary Information, SI
1.1). Analysing the statistical moments of the size distribution, it
can be shown that polydispersity decreases the overall surface area and is thus
not a particularly critical parameter for sample preparation (Supplementary Information, SI 1.2). TEM grids are frequently coated
with a hydrophobic polymer film such as poly(vinyl formal) resin. Accordingly,
the interface between the substrate and the aqueous droplet favors a minimal
contact area (Supplementary Information, SI 4, video file:
“Control.mov”).7 Consequently, a
non-negligible area of the TEM grid remains vacant and suspended particles are
not deposited uniformly but only found in segregated areas. However, if the
surface tension is sufficiently reduced, the contact area between the drop and
the substrate can remain constant during drying (Supplementary
Information, SI 4, video file: “BSA.mov”). As
the evaporation rate is not constant along the surface of the drop, capillary
flows are induced within the drying drop, resulting in the aforementioned
coffee-ring effect.3 This convective capillary flow carries the
particles towards the periphery of the drying droplet, and consequently, the
particles accumulate near the drop perimeter. It has been previously shown that
small particles tend to accumulate closer to the periphery than larger
ones.30 Surface tension can induce a thermo-capillary flow
referred to as the Marangoni flow.14 Capillary forces can be
influenced for either suppressing or promoting self-assembly of particles in a
controlled manner.3132 In highly volatile solvents this flow
can reduce and even neutralize the ‘coffee-ring’
effect.33 However, temperature-driven Marangoni flow does not
readily build up in aqueous suspensions34, but can be
strengthened by the presence of a surfactant creating a gradient in the surface
tension, which strengthens the Marangoni flow.353637 BSA
exhibits hydrophobic and hydrophilic regions38 and similarly to
surfactants, BSA is able to reduce the surface tension at the air-liquid
interface of the aqueous drop.39 This lowers the surface tension
and thus improves the wetting of the substrate. Due to the convective capillary
flows resulting in the ‘coffee-ring’, the concentration of
a surfactant will not be uniform along the air-liquid interface: the
concentration is the highest at the ‘pinned’ perimeter and
gradually decreases with height. This surface-tension gradient induces a
convective flow moving from regions of low to high surface tension, which stirs
the fluid, removes the particles from the periphery, and carries them towards
the center of the drop. This remixing improves the homogeneity of the drying
suspension and promotes the uniformity of the particle deposition.
Conclusion
We have introduced a simple protocol for prevention of the onset of drying artifacts
in drop-cast TEM samples, and have demonstrated how to prevent decoupling of the ex
situ TEM analysis from the in situ dispersion state. This is of paramount importance
for users of conventional TEM in academic research and industry, since it allows the
preservation of in situ colloidal features (size, morphology, and dimensionality)
during sample preparation by adsorption of a thin protein layer onto the particle
surface. Aside from electrosteric stabilization, the effect of BSA on the surface
tension of a drying droplet leads to uniform particle deposition and enables
high-throughput quantitative characterization of a wide range of suspended
nanomaterials.
Methods
Au NPs were prepared by reduction of gold(III) with citrate (molar ratio of citrate
to Au = 3), following the Turkevich-Frens method.4041 Sodium
citrate tribasic dehydrate and gold(III) chloride trihydrate were purchased from
Sigma-Aldrich and Fluka, respectively. The large SiO2 nanoparticles were
synthesized via the Stöber method.42 The NPs are formed by
an ammonia-catalyzed condensation reaction of hydrolyzed tetraethylorthosilicate
(TEOS). 58 mL deionized water and 7.8 mL NH3 were added to 162 mL ethanol
and the mixture heated to 65 °C. Under strong stirring, 22 mL of
preheated TEOS was added to the ethanol/ammonia/water mixture. Finally, the
nanoparticles were centrifuged at 10,000 g and washed six times with MilliQ water.
The small SiO2 nanoparticles were synthesized by the procedure of
Hartlen.43 The nanoparticles were synthesized in water,
containing L-arginine as catalyst, by adding TEOS to a cyclohexane organic layer.
TEOS slowly migrated into the aqueous phase where it hydrolyzed and condensed. 9.1
mg of L-Arginine were dissolved in 6.9 mL MilliQ water, to which then 0.45 mL of
cyclohexane was added. While stirring gently, this solution was heated to 63
°C. After temperature stabilization, 0.55 mL TEOS was added slowly to the
top organic layer, which was followed by stirring for 24 hours. The cyclohexane was
then allowed to evaporate and the solution was dialyzed against MilliQ water.
TiO2 nanoparticles were obtained from Degussa P-25 powder
(Sigma-Aldrich). The powder, as received, was dispersed in water, sonicated for ten
minutes and diluted to the desired concentration. The copper carbonate nanoparticles
(Cu) were obtained from a commercially available sample used for wood impregnation,
and were used as received, without any modification. For reasons of confidentiality
and trade secrecy, the detailed content and synthetic route was not disclosed. ZnO
nanoparticles were obtained in powder form (Sigma-Aldrich 721077). The powder, as
received, was dispersed in water, sonicated for ten minutes and diluted to the
desired concentration. BSA lyophilized powder, with fatty acid and globulin content
smaller than 1%, was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. BSA solutions were prepared by
dissolving the powder in Milli-Q water, followed by ten minutes of sonication and
filtration through a 0.2 µm low-protein-binding syringe filter. The
particle suspensions were diluted to the desired concentration using MilliQ water.
The corresponding BSA solutions were diluted from a ‘standard’
solution of 1.5 mg/mL (15 mg BSA dissolved in 10 mL MilliQ water and sonicated for
ten minutes). 100 µL particle dispersion and 100 µL of
corresponding BSA solution were mixed and stored at 4 °C prior to drop
casting. The Formvar-coated 200 mesh copper grids were placed onto parafilm, and the
overall volume of the drop cast was chosen to be V = 5 μL (c = 1). This
droplet volume resulted in a perimeter with a radius of approximately 1.34 mm, and
thus, the corresponding area of the TEM grid was F ≈ 5.6
mm2. We chose V0 and VR to be equal, and
obtained C0 via equation (1). The drop dried for over
2 hours under a fume hood before TEM imaging. Electron micrographs of the Au NPs
were taken with a FEI Morgagni and a FEI/Philips CM-100 Biotwin transmission
electron microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, Oregon, USA) operating at 80 kV. 16-bit bitmap
images were recorded onto a CCD sensor of 970 times 2100 pixels with an image
resolution of 1.112 pixel/nm (Morada, Olympus SIS, Germany). The images were
bi-leveled in ImageJ (National Institutes of Health NIH, USA) using the default
threshold method: IsoData-based variation.44 To measure the
particles, a built-in routine (ImageJ, Analyze Particles) was used, without
separation methods and constrains. The effective surface charge of the nanoparticles
was characterized at 25 °C, using phase amplitude light scattering
(Brookhaven, ZetaPALS), and the Zeta potential was estimated via the Henry
equation.45 UV-Vis extinction spectra of the suspended single and
in-situ-aggregated Au NPs were recorded at 25 °C using a Jasco V-670
spectrophotometer, using 10-mm-path-length quartz cuvettes. Light scattering
measurements were performed at constant temperature (21 °C) using a
commercial goniometer instrument (3D LS Spectrometer, LS Instruments AG,
Switzerland). The primary beam was formed by a linearly polarized and collimated
laser beam (HeNe, 632.8 nm, 21 mW), and the scattered light was collected by
single-mode optical fibers equipped with integrated collimation optics. The
collected light was coupled into two high-sensitivity APD detectors (Perkin Elmer,
Single Photon Counting Module), and their outputs were fed into a two-channel
multiple-tau correlator (Correlator.com). The signal-to-noise ratio was improved by
cross-correlating these two channels. Videos of aqueous droplets drying on the TEM
grid were recorded with a digital camera (Olympus DP72) mounted onto a
stereomicroscope (Olympus SZX16). By means of a mirror, both the top and side views
of the TEM grid were simultaneously recorded.
Author Contributions
B. M. conceived the project and carried out the fundamental proof of concept with
gold nanoparticles, C. G. executed the experiments with all other nanoparticles.
S.B. derived the theoretical treatment for polydispersity and shape and analyzed DLS
data. D. V. was creating the nomograms and was strongly involved in all TEM
discussions, C. E. in part carried out CNC experiments and TEM imaging thereof. S.
B., B. R and A. F. wrote the manuscript and all authors contributed to critical
discussion of the subject.
Authors: Eric A J Bleeker; Wim H de Jong; Robert E Geertsma; Monique Groenewold; Evelyn H W Heugens; Marjorie Koers-Jacquemijns; Dik van de Meent; Jan R Popma; Anton G Rietveld; Susan W P Wijnhoven; Flemming R Cassee; Agnes G Oomen Journal: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 3.271
Authors: Peter Bihari; Minnamari Vippola; Stephan Schultes; Marc Praetner; Alexander G Khandoga; Christoph A Reichel; Conrad Coester; Timo Tuomi; Markus Rehberg; Fritz Krombach Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol Date: 2008-11-06 Impact factor: 9.400
Authors: Yi-Chih Lin; Milton H Repollet-Pedrosa; John J Ferrie; E James Petersson; Zahra Fakhraai Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2017-03-20 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: Ananthakrishnan Soundaram Jeevarathinam; Jeanne E Lemaster; Fang Chen; Eric Zhao; Jesse V Jokerst Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: M Kathryn Brewer; Jean-Luc Putaux; Alberto Rondon; Annette Uittenbogaard; Mitchell A Sullivan; Matthew S Gentry Journal: Carbohydr Polym Date: 2020-04-14 Impact factor: 9.381
Authors: Kan Wongkamhaeng; Junnan Wang; Jeffrey A Banas; Deborah V Dawson; Julie A Holloway; Amanda J Haes; Isabelle Denry Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2020-07-03 Impact factor: 3.368