Invasive opportunistic fungal infections of humans are common among those suffering from impaired immunity, and are difficult to treat resulting in high mortality. Amphotericin B (AmB) is one of the few antifungals available to treat such infections. The AmB resistance mechanisms reported so far mainly involve decrease in ergosterol content or alterations in cell wall. In contrast, depletion of sphingolipids sensitizes cells to AmB. Recently, overexpression of PMP3 gene, encoding plasma membrane proteolipid 3 protein, was shown to increase and its deletion to decrease, AmB resistance. Here we have explored the mechanistic basis of PMP3 effect on AmB resistance. It was found that ergosterol content and cell wall integrity are not related to modulation of AmB resistance by PMP3. A few prominent phenotypes of PMP3 delete strain, namely, defective actin polarity, impaired salt tolerance, and reduced rate of endocytosis are also not related to its AmB-sensitivity. However, PMP3 overexpression mediated increase in AmB resistance requires a functional sphingolipid pathway. Moreover, AmB sensitivity of strains deleted in PMP3 can be suppressed by the addition of phytosphingosine, a sphingolipid pathway intermediate, confirming the importance of this pathway in modulation of AmB resistance by PMP3.
Invasive opportunistic fungal infections of humans are common among those suffering from impaired immunity, and are difficult to treat resulting in high mortality. Amphotericin B (AmB) is one of the few antifungals available to treat such infections. The AmB resistance mechanisms reported so far mainly involve decrease in ergosterol content or alterations in cell wall. In contrast, depletion of sphingolipids sensitizes cells to AmB. Recently, overexpression of PMP3 gene, encoding plasma membrane proteolipid 3 protein, was shown to increase and its deletion to decrease, AmB resistance. Here we have explored the mechanistic basis of PMP3 effect on AmB resistance. It was found that ergosterol content and cell wall integrity are not related to modulation of AmB resistance by PMP3. A few prominent phenotypes of PMP3 delete strain, namely, defective actin polarity, impaired salt tolerance, and reduced rate of endocytosis are also not related to its AmB-sensitivity. However, PMP3 overexpression mediated increase in AmB resistance requires a functional sphingolipid pathway. Moreover, AmB sensitivity of strains deleted in PMP3 can be suppressed by the addition of phytosphingosine, a sphingolipid pathway intermediate, confirming the importance of this pathway in modulation of AmB resistance by PMP3.
Fungi cause superficial and invasive infections. Opportunistic invasive infections,
though less prevalent, are of much greater concern because of high mortality (often over
50%) associated with them1. Many fungal species are responsible for these
invasive infections, killing over one and half a million people every year, which is
higher than that due to tuberculosis or malaria1. The treatment options
for invasive infections are quite limited2. Amphotericin B (AmB) is a
commonly used antifungal for over five decades. In spite of its toxicity, it is
preferred for its broad-spectrum and fungicidal mode of action, particularly for
treating invasive infections. Though echinocandins are also used for treating such
infections, their use is limited in resource poor settings due to high cost. Moreover,
Cryptococcus species do not respond to echinocandins and thus AmB alone (or
in combination with flucytosine) is the mainstay to treat invasive infections caused by
these species23.AmB is currently considered to kill fungi by forming large, extramembranous fungicidal
sterol sponge that depletes ergosterol from lipid bilayers4. Leakage of
intracellular ions due to pore formation is thought to be a secondary effect of AmB5. Though AmB resistance is rare, it is seen in a significant percentage of
pathogenic Candida species and filamentous fungi67. The AmB
resistance mechanisms reported so far mainly involve reduction in ergosterol content or
alterations in cell wall7891011. We have recently shown that
sphingolipids also modulate AmB resistance12. A better understanding of
AmB resistance/sensitivity mechanisms would facilitate developing therapeutic strategies
to minimize evolution of AmB resistance, or to sensitize fungi to AmB such that lower
AmB dose can be used to reduce toxicity.While investigating apparent elevated AmB resistance of yeast cells in presence of
farnesol (unpublished), we identified Saccharomyces cerevisiaePMP3 gene as conferring increased AmB resistance when present in a multicopy
plasmid. Deletion of this gene rendered the cells hypersensitive to AmB. During the
course of our studies, PMP3 gene's role in AmB resistance was also
reported by Huang et al13, but the mechanism underlying this
phenotype was not clear. PMP3 was first reported as a non-essential gene whose
deletion results in plasma membrane hyperpolarization and salt sensitivity14. It encodes a 55 amino acid hydrophophic protein of plasma membrane. A
homologous plant protein could complement salt sensitivity of a yeast strain deleted in
PMP315. Here we have explored the mechanistic basis of
PMP3 effect on AmB resistance. We show that certain prominent phenotypes of
PMP3 delete strain, namely defects in salt tolerance, actin polarity and
endocytosis, are not responsible for AmB-sensitivity of this strain. Instead, we
demonstrate that modulation of AmB resistance by PMP3 is mediated through
sphingolipid biosynthetic pathway.
Results and Discussion
PMP3 modulates AmB resistance
The S. cerevisiaePMP3 gene was isolated from a multicopy overexpression library (in
plasmid pFL44L) as conferring higher resistance to AmB. A PMP3 clone with
165 bp ORF along with 1196 bp upstream and 275 bp downstream regions was used in
further studies. To confirm the phenotype, PMP3 deletion and
overexpression strains were compared with their parent strain for AmB resistance
(Fig. 1a). While the delete strain was 8-fold more
sensitive to AmB than the parent strain, the overexpression strain was about
4-fold more tolerant compared to the parent strain. During the course of this
study, Huang et al13, while establishing a functional
variomics tool for discovering drug-resistance genes and drug targets, also
identified PMP3 as conferring AmB resistance when present at more than
one copies. PMP3 (also known as SNA1) has three paralogs in S.
cerevisiae, namely SNA2, SNA3 and SNA4, which
encode proteins with 40%, 34% and 41% identity, respectively, to that of
PMP316. Deletants of these genes were comparable to
the parent strain in their susceptibility to AmB (results not shown), implying
that these genes do not have any role in this phenotype.
Figure 1
S. cerevisiae
PMP3 and its homologs from C. albicans and C. glabrata
modulate AmB resistance.
(a) Multicopy overexpression of S. cerevisiae PMP3 (ScPMP3) and
its homologs from C. glabrata (CgPMP3) and C. albicans
(CaPMP3-O: PMP3 ortholog, orf19.1655.3; CaPMP3-B:
PMP3 best hit, orf19.2959.1) in pmp3Δ strain of
S. cerevisiae enhance AmB resistance by about 4-fold with respect
to wild-type strain (BY4741) and about 32-fold with respect to
pmp3Δ strain. The relative growth of the strains on 0.1
μg/ml AmB (not shown) was comparable to that of respective
strains on 0.2 μg/ml AmB. (b) AmB sensitivity of C.
glabrata strain deleted in PMP3 ortholog
(Cgpmp3Δ) and C. albicans strains deleted in both
alleles of PMP3 ortholog (Capmp3-OΔ/Δ) and
PMP3 best hit (Capmp3-BΔ/Δ), with respect
to their respective parent strains CG462 and SN95. Five μl of
10-fold serial dilutions of cells were spotted starting from about
105 cells/spot, as described in Methods.
To test if PMP3 has a similar role in pathogenic yeasts, we searched for
homologs in C. albicans and C. glabrata. C. albicans has
two homologs, which encode proteins that show 51% and 45% identity at amino acid
level to that of S. cerevisiae. The first one is referred to as
CaPMP3 ortholog (orf19.1655.3) and the second one as CaPMP3
best hit (orf19.2959.1) in Candida Genome Database17. C.
glabrata has a single ortholog CgPMP3 (CAGL0M08552g) encoding a
protein with 76% identity to ScPmp3p. The open reading frames of these homologs
were PCR amplified and used to replace the ORF in ScPMP3 clone, thereby
placing these ORFs under the control of ScPMP3 promoter and terminator in
pFL44L vector. These were tested for their ability to modulate AmB resistance
after being transformed into pmp3Δ strain of S.
cerevisiae. PMP3 ortholog from C. albicans was earlier shown
to increase AmB resistance of S. cerevisiae13. In
addition, we found CaPMP3 best hit and CgPMP3, besides
complementing pmp3 mutation, provided resistance higher than that of
wild-type strain (Fig. 1a). While the AmB resistance
conferred by CgPMP3 and CaPMP3 best hit (CaPMP3-B) was
similar to that of ScPMP3, i.e., 4-fold higher than that of wild-type
strain, the CaPMP3 ortholog (CaPMP3-O) provided 2-fold higher
resistance (Fig. 1a).To study the role of CaPMP3 ortholog and CaPMP3 best hit in C.
albicans, we deleted both alleles of these genes in strain SN95 and
confirmed by diagnostic PCR (Fig. S1). The C.
glabrata ortholog CgPMP3 (CAGL0M08552g) was also deleted and
confirmed by diagnostic PCR (Fig. S2). The AmB
susceptibility of these delete strains with respect to their parent strains was
compared (Fig. 1b). While deletion of PMP3
orthologs in C. glabrata and C. albicans sensitized the cells to
AmB by about 4-fold, deletion of CaPMP3 best hit did not have any effect.
The AmB sensitivity of ortholog deletants in both these species provides strong
evidence that PMP3 gene is important for modulation of AmB resistance in
pathogenic fungi as well.
AmB resistance mediated by Pmp3p is not dependent on ergosterol or Hsp90
or cell wall integrity
As far as the mechanistic basis of PMP3 effect on AmB resistance is
concerned, Huang et al13 showed that it is not related to
its role in ion homeostasis. Absence or severe reduction in the amount of
ergosterol in the fungal membranes and its replacement with certain other
sterols results in AmB resistance in fungi71011. To address
this possibility total cellular content of ergosterol was estimated, as
described18. The ergosterol content, as % wet weight of
cells, of parent, delete and overexpression strains, was 0.021 ±
0.001, 0.023 ± 0.002 and 0.023 ± 0.001, respectively.
Though these values are comparable, it is possible that the intracellular
distribution of ergosterol might be affected. To check this, cells were stained
with filipin, which is specific for sterols19, and observed (Fig. S3a). While wild-type and PMP3 overexpression
strains showed intense fluorescent spots within cells, pmp3Δ
strain lacked such spots. Thus, it is possible that more ergosterol is
distributed in the plasma membrane of the delete strain, rendering it more
accessible for AmB binding and killing. If this is true, then the delete strain
should be more sensitive to other polyenes which also act by binding to
ergosterol. However, the sensitivity pmp3Δ strain to the polyenes
nystatin, natamycin and filipin was found to be comparable to that of wild-type
and PMP3 overexpression strains (Fig. S3b), ruling
out ergosterol distribution or content having any role in modulation of AmB
resistance by PMP3. Huang et al13 have also ruled out the
involvement of ergosterol in modulation of AmB resistance by PMP3, since
this gene did not affect the resistance against other polyenes.A recent report suggested that AmB resistance of ergosterol biosynthetic pathway
mutants is highly dependent on Hsp90 chaperone and these mutants are
hypersensitive to Hsp90 inhibitors radicicol and geldanamycin as well as
oxidative stress20. To check the Hsp90 dependence of AmB
resistance conferred by PMP3, the sensitivity of this strain to radicicol
and oxidative stress was checked along with erg6Δ strain as
positive control (Table 1). The AmB resistance of
erg6Δ strain and PMP3 overexpression strain was
comparable. However, while erg6Δ strain was 8-fold and 4-fold,
respectively, more sensitive to radicicol and oxidative stress, the sensitivity
of PMP3 overexpression strain was comparable to wild-type, implying that
Pmp3p is not dependant on Hsp90 for conferring AmB resistance. Cell wall
alterations also can affect AmB resistance7. Compared to parent
strain, PMP3 delete strain showed normal chitin deposition (Fig. S4a), as well as similar resistance to cell wall disrupting
agents calcofluor white, sodium dodecyl sulphate and congo red (Fig. S4b), implying that AmB sensitivity of delete strain is not
related to cell wall integrity.
Table 1
AmB resistance mediated by PMP3 is not dependant on
HSP90
Strain
MIC
AmB, μg/ml
Radicicol, μM
TBH, mM
BY4741/vector
0.4
16
2
pmp3Δ/vector
0.05
8
2
pmp3Δ/ScPMP3
1.6
16
2
erg6Δ/vector
1.6
2
0.5
MIC for AmB and radicicol was determined in SC-ura broth at
30°C. Sensitivity to oxidative stress was
determined by dilution spotting on SC-ura agar medium with
tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBH) at 37°C. MIC is
the concentration at which no growth was observed.
Actin polarity and endocytosis, though impaired in pmp3Δ
strain, are not responsible for its AmB sensitivity
To gain further insight into PMP3 mechanism of action, we tried to predict
its possible functions on the basis of biological roles of genes that interact
with PMP3. The list of interacting genes was analyzed using DAVID
Bioinformatics Resources21 for enrichment of gene ontology terms
for biological processes. The top-two annotation clusters corresponded to
endocytosis and actin cytoskeleton (Table 2). To check
if impaired endocytosis would result in AmB sensitivity, we screened mutants of
several genes having role in endocytosis for their AmB sensitivity. Deletants of
RVS161 and RVS167 were about 4-fold more sensitive to AmB
compared to the parent strain (Fig. S5). These strains,
besides defects in endocytosis have several other phenotypes including salt
sensitivity and altered actin cytoskeleton22232425.
SUR7, encoding an eisosome protein involved in endocytosis, partially
suppresses several of these phenotypes upon multicopy overexpression262728. Thus, we exploited overexpression of SUR7 to
understand if AmB sensitivity of pmp3Δ strain is a consequence of
defects in actin cytoskeleton or endocytosis, or it is an independent
phenotype.
Table 2
Functional Annotation Clustering of PMP3 interacting genes
List of PMP3 interacting genes were downloaded from
SGD16 and analyzed with DAVID Functional
Annotation Clustering tool (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/home.jsp) of
DAVID Bioinformatics Resources v6.721 for
enrichment of gene ontology terms using default parameters,
but restricted to biological processes (GOTERM_BP_FAT
category). Only the top-two annotation clusters with greater
than 2-fold enrichment are listed, along with the genes
grouped under each cluster.
A large scale survey using GFP-Snc1-Suc2 reporter has indicated that endocytosis
is decreased in pmp3Δ strain29. We monitored rate
of endocytosis with a different reporter, namely methionine permease (Mup1)
tagged with ecliptic pHluorin, which is a pH-sensitive green fluorescent protein
variant that does not fluoresce after internalization to an acidic compartment
like vacuole3031. Mup1-pHluorin is internalized rapidly upon
exposure to methionine. Wild-type cells showed substantial decrease in
Mup1-pHluorin intensity within 20 min after adding methionine (Fig. 2a). However, in pmp3Δ strain 40 min was needed
for a similar decrease, confirming that the rate of endocytosis is slowed down
in this strain. SUR7 expressed from a multicopy plasmid restored the rate
of endocytosis of pmp3Δ strain to normal level (Fig. 2a). Mup1-pHluorin fluorescence was also monitored by flow
cytometry (Fig. 2b). Though background fluorescence was
high for all the strains, the rate of decrease in fluorescence is indicative of
rate of endocytosis. While it was slow in the pmp3Δ strain, it
was restored to wild-type level upon SUR7 overexpression.
Figure 2
Slow rate of endocytosis of pmp3Δ strain is restored to normal
level by overexpression of ScSUR7.
(a) Wild type strain 3818 (SEY6210-Mup1pHluorin) and pmp3Δ
strain (3818 pmp3Δ::HIS3) transformed with either
vector or ScSUR7, were grown without methionine to promote
accumulation of Mup1-pHluorin in the plasma membrane. After addition of 20
μg/ml methionine, random fields of cells were imaged at
different time intervals. All images were obtained at identical exposure
conditions. (b) After addition of methionine, Mup1-pHluorin fluorescence was
measured at indicated time intervals in a flow cytometer, as described in
Methods. The values shown are average of two replicates from one
representative experiment. Experiments were repeated thrice with comparable
results.
Actin cytoskeleton plays a central role in endocytosis25 and
rvs161Δ and rvs167Δ strains impaired in
endocytosis also have actin polarization defects23. Moreover, as
PMP3 interacts with genes having role in actin cytoskeleton (Table 2), we visualized actin in PMP3 strains. The
pmp3Δ strain showed pronounced defect in actin polarity,
which is suppressed by overexpression of SUR7 (Fig.
3 and Fig. S6). SUR7 also suppressed the
sensitivity of pmp3Δ, rvs161Δ and
rvs167Δ strains to NaCl (Fig. 4a). However,
it could not reverse the sensitivity of these strains to AmB (Fig. 4b), demonstrating that AmB sensitivity of these mutants is not
mediated by defects in actin polarity, endocytosis or NaCl tolerance.
Figure 3
Actin polarization defect of pmp3Δ strain is suppressed by
multicopy SUR7 overexpression.
Cells were grown to log phase and actin was visualized by rhodamine
phalloidin staining. About 200 cells with small buds were scored according
to their polarization state. Cells with actin patches concentrated in the
small bud, with fewer than four patches in the mother cell, were classified
as polarized cells. Other cells with more actin patches in the mother cell
than in the small bud were classified as depolarized cells. Representative
images are shown in Figure S6. Mean values of two independent experiments
are given. The error bars indicate the range.
Figure 4
SUR7 overexpression can suppress salt sensitivity (a), but not AmB
sensitivity (b) of strains deleted in PMP3, RVS161 or RVS167.
Wild-type (BY4741) and PMP3 overexpression strains are included as
controls.
Sphingolipid biosynthetic pathway is essential for PMP3 mediated
increase in AmB resistance
We had recently shown that sphingolipid biosynthetic pathway genes FEN1
(ELO2) and SUR4 (ELO3) modulate AmB resistance12. While inhibition of sphingolipid biosynthesis with myriocin
sensitized cells to AmB, addition of phytosphingosine, a sphingolipid pathway
intermediate, reversed this phenotype12. To check the importance
of this pathway for PMP3 mediated increase in AmB resistance, multicopy
ScPMP3 was transformed into a few sphingolipid pathway mutants and
the resistance was checked (Fig. 5a). In the wild-type
parent strain (BY4741) ScPMP3 could increase AmB resistance at least by
4-fold. However, it increased AmB resistance by 2-fold or less in mutants of
sphingolipid biosynthetic genes FEN1 and SUR4, and regulatory
genes YPK13233 and SAC134. If
PMP3 overexpression effect is independent of sphingolipid pathway,
then fold-increase in AmB resistance by PMP3 in these mutants should have
been comparable to that of the parent strain. Only 2-fold or less increase in
resistance shows that PMP3 is dependent on this pathway for enhancing AmB
resistance. Even this increase appears to be due to genetic redundancy.
FEN1 and SUR4 are involved in fatty acid elongation and can
partly compensate for each other's loss, since double deletion is
lethal35. YPK1 and YPK2 are synthetic
lethal36 and arose from the whole genome duplication37. Sac1p is a phosphatidylinositol phosphate phosphatase, and its
catalytic domain (Sac1-like domain) is seen among several phosphatases with
partially overlapping function38. Sac1p is known to modulate
sphingolipid metabolism3439. Physical interaction of Pmp3p and
Sac1p has also been reported in a large-scale study40. Thus it
appears likely that Pmp3p modulates sphingolipid biosynthesis and AmB resistance
by interacting with Sac1p. Dependence of Pmp3p on Sac1p provides possible link
between Pmp3p and sphingolipid pathway.
Figure 5
PMP3 modulates AmB resistance through sphingolipid biosynthetic
pathway.
(a) Sphingolipid biosynthetic pathway genes FEN1
and SUR4 and regulatory genes YPK1 and SAC1 are
important for PMP3 mediated increase in AmB resistance. Wild-type
(BY4741) and pmp3Δ strains overexpressing ScPMP3 serve
as positive controls. (b) PMP3 modulates tolerance to myriocin, a
sphingolipid biosynthetic pathway inhibitor. While strains overexpressing
PMP3 are about 4-fold more tolerant, the strain deleted in
PMP3 is about 2-fold more sensitive to myriocin, compared to the
wild-type strain BY4741.
Myriocin inhibits the first committed step of sphingolipid biosynthesis catalyzed
by serine palmitoyltransferase33. Sphingolipid pathway regulatory
genes YPK13233 and SAC134 modulate
myriocin resistance. To test if PMP3 also regulates sphingolipid pathway,
we checked myriocin resistance of deletion and overexpression strains. While
deletion of PMP3 decreased myriocin resistance by 2-fold, its
overexpression increased myriocin resistance by 4-fold, both with respect to
parent strain (Fig. 5b), indicating that PMP3 is
possibly involved in regulation of this pathway in S. cerevisiae. We also
checked the myriocin sensitivity of C. glabrata strain deleted in
PMP3 ortholog, and C. albicans strains deleted in PMP3
ortholog or best hit. However, the sensitivity of these strains was found to be
comparable to that of their respective parent strains (Fig.
S7). Another approach used to establish the role or dependence of
genes on sphingolipid pathway is by supplementing with phytosphingosine (PHS), a
sphingolipid pathway intermediate3341. Addition of PHS
increased the AmB resistance of pmp3Δ strain of S.
cerevisiae to wild type level. It also decreased the AmB resistance of
PMP3 overexpression strain to nearly wild type level (Fig. 6a), perhaps by its known antifungal activity at high
concentration42. PHS also suppressed AmB sensitivity of C.
glabrata and C. albicans strains deleted in PMP3 orthologs
(Figs. 6b and 6c). These results
further establish that PMP3 modulates AmB resistance through sphingolipid
pathway in S. cerevisiae as well as in pathogenic Candida
species.
Figure 6
Phytosphingosine (PHS), a sphingolipid pathway intermediate, modulates AmB
resistance.
(a) Growth of wild-type (BY4741), PMP3 deletion and overexpression
strains of S. cerevisiae on indicated concentrations of AmB alone or
in combination with 5 μM phytosphingosine (PHS). Relative growth
of strains at 0.8 μg/ml AmB (not shown) was comparable to their
growth at 1.6 μg/ml. (b) Growth of wild-type (CG462) and
PMP3 delete (Cgpmp3Δ) strains of C.
glabrata on indicated concentrations of AmB alone or in combination
with 5 μM PHS. (c) Growth of C. albicans strains deleted
in both alleles of PMP3 ortholog (Capmp3-OΔ/Δ)
or PMP3 best hit (Capmp3-BΔ/Δ), with respect
to their parent SN95 on indicated concentrations of AmB alone or in
combination with 10 μM PHS.
Sphingolipid bases and complex sphingolipids have multiple roles in cells, both
as structural components and as signalling molecules4344.
Mutants of sphingolipid pathway show pleiotropic phenotypes44, of
which those affected in actin cytoskeleton45, endocytosis46 and AmB resistance12 are pertinent here. Since
actin is critical for endocytosis25, defective endocytosis could
be a consequence of impaired actin polarity. Thus, impaired actin cytoskeleton
and slow rate of endocytosis of pmp3Δ strain are consistent with
the regulatory role played by PMP3 in sphingolipid pathway.In conclusion, we have shown that a few striking phenotypes of PMP3
mutant, such as impaired actin polarity, endocytosis and salt tolerance are not
related to its AmB-sensitivity. Rather, we show that modulation of AmB
resistance by PMP3 is dependent on sphingolipid biosynthetic pathway,
since AmB sensitivity of PMP3 deletants is suppressed by
phytosphingosine, a sphingolipid pathway intermediate. Moreover, enhanced AmB
resistance conferred by overexpression of PMP3 is dependent on functional
sphingolipid biosynthetic and regulatory genes. Efforts are underway to
elucidate the precise mechanism underlying PMP3 effect or dependence on
sphingolipid pathway for modulating AmB resistance.
Methods
Fine chemicals and yeast synthetic drop-out medium supplements without uracil were
procured from Sigma. All other media components were obtained from BD (Difco).
Oligonucleotides were custom synthesised from Sigma-Genosys, India. Restriction
enzymes, DNA polymerases and other DNA modifying enzymes were obtained from New
England Biolabs, and DNA purification kits were obtained from Qiagen.
Strains, media and growth conditions
S. cerevisiae and Candida strains and plasmids used in this study
are listed in Table S1 and S2. The Escherichia coli strain
DH5α was used as a cloning host. YPD and Synthetic complete (SC)
media were prepared and used as described12. Uracil supplement is
omitted in SC medium to provide SC-ura medium. Yeast transformations were
carried out using the modified lithium acetate method47. Stock
solutions of AmB (2 mg/ml), myriocin (5 mM), phytosphingosine (15 mM) and
radicicol (5 mM) were prepared in DMSO. Stock solutions of nourseothricin (200
mg/ml) and tert-butyl hydroperoxide (500 mM) were made in water.
Growth assays by dilution spotting
For dilution spotting assays, the strains/transformants were grown overnight in
SC or SC-ura medium, reinoculated in fresh medium to an A600
of 0.1 and grown for 6 h. The exponential phase cells were harvested, washed and
resuspended in sterile water to an A600 of 1.0 (~2
× 107 cells/ml). Ten-fold serial dilutions were made
in water and 5 μl of each dilution was spotted on SC or SC-ura
plates with desired concentration of compounds, as mentioned in Figures. DMSO
alone was included in control plates, corresponding to its concentration in
experimental plates, where appropriate. Plates were incubated for 2 days at
30°C before taking photographs. These experiments were repeated at
least three times with comparable results.
Cloning methods
The ORFs of putative homologs of ScPMP3 in C. albicans
[CaPMP3-ortholog (orf19.1655.3), CaPMP3-Best hit
(orf19.2959.1)] and C. glabrata (CAGL0M08552g) were
PCR amplified from the genomic DNA of C. albicans and C. glabrata
with specific primers sets (Table S3). The PCR products were then used to
replace the ScPMP3 ORF in a ScPMP3 clone in multicopy vector
pFL44L, using Circular Polymerase Extension Cloning (CPEC) method4849, thereby retaining the ScPMP3 promoter and terminator
regions for all PMP3 orthologs as well. For cloning ScSUR7 gene,
the SUR7 ORF of S. cerevisiae along with its promoter and
terminator (+568 to −326 bp) was amplified from strain BY4741 with
forward primer ScSUR7-OCS1 and reverse primer ScSUR7-OCA1 (Table S3) and cloned
in pFL44L by CPEC method4849.
Construction of C. albicans strains deleted in
CaPMP3-ortholog and CaPMP3-best hit
Both alleles of CaPMP3-ortholog (orf19.1655.3) and CaPMP3-Best hit
(orf19.2959.1) were deleted in C. albicans, using HAH2 cassette
and gene-specific primers, as described12, and confirmed by
diagnostic PCR with appropriate primers (Table S3).
Construction of C. glabrata strain deleted in
CgPMP3
PMP3 ortholog in C. glabrata (CAGL0M08552g) was deleted
using a selection cassette conferring nourseothricin resistance containing
CaNAT1 gene with codon usage adapted for Candida species50. A 508 bp region upstream of, and 472 bp region downstream of
CgPMP3 ORF were PCR amplified from wild type genomic DNA using
primers for upstream (CgPMP3-US1 and CgPMP3-UA1) and downstream regions
(CgPMP3-DS1 and CgPMP3-DA1). The upstream flanking region was fused with the
5′ region of CaNAT1 cassette using amplified upstream region
and plasmid (pCR2.1-NAT51) with CaNAT1 as templates and
primers CgPMP3-US1 and CaNAT1-US-R1 to generate upstream split marker.
Similarly, the downstream flanking region was fused to 3′ region of
CaNAT1 cassette with amplified downstream region and pCR2.1-NAT as
templates and primers CaNAT1-DS-F1 and CgPMP3-DA1 to generate downstream split
marker. These fusion products, which share 401 bp homology between them in the
cassette, were mixed together, transformed52 into C.
glabrata wild type strain CG462, and plated on YPD plate. After
incubation at 30°C for 24 h, cells were replica-plated onto YPD
plate with 200 μg/ml nourseothricin and further incubated for 24 h.
Nourseothricin resistant colonies were purified and checked for gene deletion by
diagnostic PCR using cassette specific primers and primers outside the flanking
region of homology (Table S3).
Fluorescence microscopy
Mup1-pHluorin internalization assay was performed as reported3153. Mup1- pHluorin localization was visualized using a Nikon A1R confocal
microscope using FITC optics and 100X oil immersion objective. Images were
analysed using NIS Elements software. Visualization of actin by rhodamine
phalloidin staining was carried out as described54. Calcofluor
staining of cell wall was done as described55. The subcellular
localization of sterols was monitored by staining with filipin as described19 with slight modification. Exponentially growing cells (0.5 OD
cells/ml) were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at 30°C,
washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated with 5
μg/ml of filipin (Sigma F9765) in the dark at 30°C for 5
min. The stained cells were directly observed under a confocal laser scanning
microscope (Nikon A1R) using 405 nm laser and images were analysed using NIS
element software.
Flow cytometry
Log-phase cells were grown in SC medium without uracil and methionine for 6
hours, and then methionine was added to 20 μg/ml final
concentration. At different time intervals cells were collected by
centrifugation, washed and resuspended in PBS. Mup1-pHluorin fluorescence was
measured with BD Accuri™ C6 flow cytometer in FL1 channel.
Excitation and emission wavelengths were 488 nm and 530 nm, respectively. For
each sample 104 cells were analysed. Three independent
experiments were done with two replicates each time.
Author Contributions
K.G. designed the project and provided overall guidance. V.K.B. and S.S. carried out
the experiments and collected data. V.K.B. and K.G. drafted and finalized the
manuscript. A.K.M. provided technical inputs and guidance for confocal microscopy.
S.S., M.A. and A.K.M. provided critical input during group meetings and on the
manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Authors: John P Miller; Russell S Lo; Asa Ben-Hur; Cynthia Desmarais; Igor Stagljar; William Stafford Noble; Stanley Fields Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-08-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: J Michael Cherry; Eurie L Hong; Craig Amundsen; Rama Balakrishnan; Gail Binkley; Esther T Chan; Karen R Christie; Maria C Costanzo; Selina S Dwight; Stacia R Engel; Dianna G Fisk; Jodi E Hirschman; Benjamin C Hitz; Kalpana Karra; Cynthia J Krieger; Stuart R Miyasato; Rob S Nash; Julie Park; Marek S Skrzypek; Matt Simison; Shuai Weng; Edith D Wong Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2011-11-21 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Angelo Sicilia; Riccardo Russo; Marco Caruso; Carmen Arlotta; Silvia Di Silvestro; Frederick G Gmitter; Alessandra Gentile; Elisabetta Nicolosi; Angela Roberta Lo Piero Journal: Biology (Basel) Date: 2022-05-17
Authors: Alberto T Gatta; Louise H Wong; Yves Y Sere; Diana M Calderón-Noreña; Shamshad Cockcroft; Anant K Menon; Tim P Levine Journal: Elife Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Françoise M Roelants; Neha Chauhan; Alexander Muir; Jameson C Davis; Anant K Menon; Timothy P Levine; Jeremy Thorner Journal: Mol Biol Cell Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 4.138
Authors: Henri A Galez; Françoise M Roelants; Sarah M Palm; Kendra K Reynaud; Nicholas T Ingolia; Jeremy Thorner Journal: Membranes (Basel) Date: 2021-06-30