| Literature DB >> 25964820 |
Grzegorz Lech1, Wiesław Chwała2, Tadeusz Ambroży3, Stanisław Sterkowicz1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of maximal muscle torques at individual stages of development of athletes and to determine the relationship between muscle torques, fighting methods and the level of sports performance. The activity of 25 judo contestants during judo combats and the effectiveness of actions were evaluated. Maximum muscle torques in flexors/extensors of the body trunk, shoulder, elbow, hip and knee joints were measured. The level of significance was set at p≤0.05; for multiple comparisons the Mann-Whitney U test, p≤0.016, was used. Intergroup differences in relative torques in five muscle groups studied (elbow extensors, shoulder flexors, knee flexors, knee extensors, hip flexors) were not significant. In cadets, relative maximum muscle torques in hip extensors correlated with the activity index (Spearman's r=0.756). In juniors, maximum relative torques in elbow flexors and knee flexors correlated with the activity index (r=0.73 and r=0.76, respectively). The effectiveness of actions correlated with relative maximum torque in elbow extensors (r=0.67). In seniors, the relative maximum muscle torque in shoulder flexors correlated with the activity index during the second part of the combat (r=0.821).Entities:
Keywords: cadets; course of judo combat; juniors; martial arts; maximum muscle force; seniors
Year: 2015 PMID: 25964820 PMCID: PMC4415829 DOI: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hum Kinet ISSN: 1640-5544 Impact factor: 2.193
Basic characteristics of the study participants
| Senior (1) | Junior (2) | Cadet (3) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | mean (±SD) | N | mean (±SD) | N | mean (±SD) | |
| Age (years) | 7 | 21.6±0.98 | 10 | 17.5±0.71 | 8 | 15.5±0.54 |
| training experience (years) | 7 | 12.4±1.7 | 10 | 8.4±1.2 | 8 | 6.1±0.8 |
| Body height (cm) | 7 | 180.4±5.4 | 10 | 180.4±3.6 | 8 | 177.4±6.2 |
| Body mass (kg) | 7 | 82.2±7.6 | 10 | 85.8±10.5 | 8 | 71.7±7.5 |
| Lean body mass (kg) | 7 | 74.2±6.2 | 10 | 72.1±5.5 | 8 | 65.2±6.3 |
Standard joint positions for measurements of maximal muscle torques
| Measured muscle group | Measurement position | Angles in the joints between adjacent segments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| τmax FLX and EXT SJ | standing | SJ - 0
| EJ - 0
| WJ - 0
|
| τmax FLX and EXT EJ | standing | SJ - 0
| EJ - 90
| WJ - 0
|
| τmax FLX and EXT HJ | supine | HJ - 90
| KJ - 90
| AJ - 0
|
| τmax FLX and EXT KJ | Sitting | HJ - 90
| KJ - 90
| AJ - 0
|
| τmax FLX and EXT TR | Sitting | HJ - 90
| KJ - 90
| AJ - 0
|
FLX – flexors, EXT – extensors, SJ – shoulder joint, EJ – elbow joint, WJ – radiocarpal (wrist) joint, HJ – hip joint, KJ – knee joint, AJ – ankle joint TR – trunk, Angle 0º, 90º– Angles between neighboring body segments in measurement positions. According to judo match evaluators mentioned above, the muscles which were mostly engaged in the Seoi-nage throw were SJ FLX, TR EXT, EJ FLX, HJ EXT, KJ EXT, and TR FLX.
Technical and tactical excellence indices and the level of performance in the studied groups of judo competitors
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Senior | Junior | Cadet | |
| WA | 2.63±0.72 | 2.13±0.63 | 1.73±0.76 |
| WA1 | 1.8± 0.60 | 1.03±0.45 | 1.16±0.61 |
| WA2 | 1.37±0.28 | 1.56±0.56 | 0.94±0.59 |
| RWA | 0.43± 0.67 | − 0.53±0.73 | 0.57±0.42 |
| WS | 2.84±1.00 | 3.42±1.37 | 4.51±1.05 |
| WS1 | 3.10±1.77 | 4.04±2.02 | 5.25±1.76 |
| WS2 | 2.11±1.24 | 3.24±2.06 | 2.96±2.71 |
| RWS | 1.00±2.14 | 0.81±2.95 | 2.30±4.20 |
| PO | 4.00±5.07 | 3.30±1.51 | 2.88±3.01 |
Mean values of relative muscle torques (Nm/kg) in different age groups of contestants
| Senior (1) | Junior (2) | Cadet (3) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EJ FLX[ | 1.19 ± 0.19 (3[ | 1.29 ± 0.15 (3[ | 0.93 ± 0.13 |
| EJ EXT (elbow ext.) | 0.74 ± 0.13 | 0.87 ± 0.12 | 0.88 ± 0.25 |
| SJ FLX (shoulder flex.) | 1.68 ± 0.32 | 1.62 ± 0.26 | 1.58 ± 0.29 |
| SJ EXT[ | 1.75 ± 0.30 (2[ | 1.09 ± 0.13 | 1.21 ± 0.11 |
| KJ FLX (knee flex.) | 1.31 ± 0.29 | 1.58 ± 0.23 | 1.54 ± 0.25 |
| KJ EXT (knee ext.) | 3.41 ± 0.67 | 3.75 ± 0.51 | 3.44 ± 0.59 |
| HJ FLX (hip flex.) | 2.02 ± 0.16 | 1.64 ± 0.45 | 1.77 ± 0.58 |
| HJ EXT[ | 4.78 ± 0.31 (2[ | 3.31 ± 0.85 | 4.02 ± 0.97 |
| TR FLX[ | 3.02 ± 0.09 (2[ | 1.48 ± 0.21 (3[ | 2.72 ± 0.70 |
| TR EXT[ | 6.03 ± 0.30 (2[ | 3.84 ± 0.29 | 4.74 ± 1.21 |
| Torque total [ | 25.93 ± 1.30 (2[ | 20.47 ± 1.15 | 22.84 ± 2.83 |
Indices referring to the measurements of the elbow, shoulder, hip and knee joints: EJ FLX, EJ EXT, SJ FLX, SJ EXT, KJ FLX, KJ EXT, HJ FLX, HJ EXT are the arithmetic means of the right and left joints.
p<0.05;
p<0.01.
For multiple comparisons used with the Mann-Whitney test -
p<0.016;
p<0.01.
Statistically significant values of the correlation coefficient between torques in the tested muscle groups, and the indices of fighting methods and the level of performance in the seniors, juniors and cadets
| N | R Spearman | t(N-2) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior | ||||
| RWA & TR EXT | 7 | 0.883 | 4.205 | 0.008 |
| WA1 & HJ EXT | 7 | −0.786 | −2.840 | 0.036 |
| WA2 & HJ FLX | 7 | −0.786 | −2.840 | 0.036 |
| PO & SJ EXT | 7 | −0.829 | −3.313 | 0.021 |
| Junior | ||||
| WA1 & SJ EXT | 10 | −0.784 | −3.574 | 0.007 |
| WA2 & HJ FLX | 10 | −0.739 | −3.098 | 0.015 |
| WA2 & HJ EXT | 10 | −0.751 | −3.216 | 0.012 |
| WS & TR EXT | 10 | −0.758 | −3.283 | 0.011 |
| WS1 & SJ FLX | 10 | −0.657 | −2.462 | 0.039 |
| Cadet | ||||
| WS & TR EXT | 8 | −0.810 | −3.378 | 0.015 |
| WS1 & SJ FLX | 8 | −0.778 | −3.038 | 0.023 |
| WS1 & TR EXT | 8 | −0.755 | −2.816 | 0.031 |
| WS1& TORQUES TOTAL | 8 | −0.743 | −2.715 | 0.035 |
Favorable correlations are written in bold (higher level of muscular torque correlated with favorable levels of the indices of fighting methods, or the contestants’ level of performance).