Suzanne Morton1, Sarah C Shih2, Chloe H Winther3, Aldo Tinoco4, Rodger S Kessler5, Sarah Hudson Scholle6. 1. National Committee for Quality Assurance, Washington, DC morton@ncqa.org. 2. Primary Care Information Project, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, New York. 3. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 4. Evolent Health, Arlington, Virginia. 5. University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont. 6. National Committee for Quality Assurance, Washington, DC.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Health information technology (IT) offers promising tools for improving care coordination. We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of 6 proposed care coordination objectives for stage 3 of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services electronic health record incentive program (Meaningful Use) related to referrals, notification of care from other facilities, patient clinical summaries, and patient dashboards. METHODS: We surveyed physician-owned and hospital/health system-affiliated primary care practices that achieved patient-centered medical home recognition and participated in the Meaningful Use program, and community health clinics with patient-centered medical home recognition (most with certified electronic health record systems). The response rate was 35.1%. We ascertained whether practices had implemented proposed objectives and perceptions of their importance. We analyzed the association of organizational and contextual factors with self-reported use of health IT to support care coordination activities. RESULTS: Although 78% of the 350 respondents viewed timely notification of hospital discharges as very important, only 48.7% used health IT systems to accomplish this task. The activity most frequently supported by health IT was providing clinical summaries to patients, in 76.6% of practices; however, merely 47.7% considered this activity very important. Greater use of health IT to support care coordination activities was positively associated with the presence of a nonclinician responsible for care coordination and the practice's capacity for systematic change. CONCLUSIONS: Even among practices having a strong commitment to the medical home model, the use of health IT to support care coordination objectives is not consistent. Health IT capabilities are not currently aligned with clinicians' priorities. Many practices will need financial and technical assistance for health IT to enhance care coordination.
PURPOSE: Health information technology (IT) offers promising tools for improving care coordination. We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of 6 proposed care coordination objectives for stage 3 of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services electronic health record incentive program (Meaningful Use) related to referrals, notification of care from other facilities, patient clinical summaries, and patient dashboards. METHODS: We surveyed physician-owned and hospital/health system-affiliated primary care practices that achieved patient-centered medical home recognition and participated in the Meaningful Use program, and community health clinics with patient-centered medical home recognition (most with certified electronic health record systems). The response rate was 35.1%. We ascertained whether practices had implemented proposed objectives and perceptions of their importance. We analyzed the association of organizational and contextual factors with self-reported use of health IT to support care coordination activities. RESULTS: Although 78% of the 350 respondents viewed timely notification of hospital discharges as very important, only 48.7% used health IT systems to accomplish this task. The activity most frequently supported by health IT was providing clinical summaries to patients, in 76.6% of practices; however, merely 47.7% considered this activity very important. Greater use of health IT to support care coordination activities was positively associated with the presence of a nonclinician responsible for care coordination and the practice's capacity for systematic change. CONCLUSIONS: Even among practices having a strong commitment to the medical home model, the use of health IT to support care coordination objectives is not consistent. Health IT capabilities are not currently aligned with clinicians' priorities. Many practices will need financial and technical assistance for health IT to enhance care coordination.
Authors: Carlos Roberto Jaén; Benjamin F Crabtree; Raymond F Palmer; Robert L Ferrer; Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Elizabeth E Stewart; Robert Wood; Marivel Davila; Kurt C Stange Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Stephen E Ross; Lisa M Schilling; Douglas H Fernald; Arthur J Davidson; David R West Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2010-01-12 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Elaine C Khoong; Wesley S Gibbert; Jane M Garbutt; Walton Sumner; Ross C Brownson Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Ann S O'Malley; Joy M Grossman; Genna R Cohen; Nicole M Kemper; Hoangmai H Pham Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2009-12-22 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Emily Gill; Patricia C Dykes; Robert S Rudin; Marianne Storm; Kelly McGrath; David W Bates Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: David T Liss; Eloisa Serrano; Julie Wakeman; Christine Nowicki; David R Buchanan; Ana Cesan; Tiffany Brown Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 4.773