Literature DB >> 25962457

Perceptual limits in a simulated "Cocktail party".

Takayuki Kawashima1, Takao Sato.   

Abstract

Numerosity judgments of simultaneous talkers were examined. Listeners were required to report the number of talkers heard when this number varied (1 to 13). Spatial location of talkers (1 or 6 locations), duration of talker voices (0.8 s, 5.0 s, and 15.0 s), and gender arrangement of talkers also were manipulated in four experiments. In all experiments, the proportion of correct numerosity judgments monotonically decreased as talker numbers increased. Perceptual limits, defined as talker numbers with proportion correct scores of 0.5, varied between 3 to 5 talkers, on average, depending on listening conditions, and were significantly higher for spatially separated talkers, for the longer voices, and for the mixed gender voices (Experiments 1, 2, and 3). In addition, Experiment 4 found that average numerosity response times increased monotonically over a range of one to four talkers. These results support the idea that, before counting talkers, listeners perceptually segregate talkers to render numerosity judgments. They also suggest that our functional auditory world for simultaneous voices may consist of, at most, three to five talkers depending on listening situations. In light of these results, possible causes for such perceptual limits are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25962457     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0910-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  7 in total

1.  Discrimination of changes in spatial configuration for multiple, simultaneously presented sounds.

Authors:  William A Yost; M Torben Pastore; Yi Zhou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.

Authors:  William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  How many images are in an auditory scene?

Authors:  Xuan Zhong; William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Loudness of an auditory scene composed of multiple talkers.

Authors:  William A Yost; M Torben Pastore; Kathryn R Pulling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The relative size of auditory scenes of multiple talkers.

Authors:  William A Yost; M Torben Pastore; Kathryn R Pulling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  FreeHear: A New Sound-Field Speech-in-Babble Hearing Assessment Tool.

Authors:  David R Moore; Helen Whiston; Melanie Lough; Antonia Marsden; Harvey Dillon; Kevin J Munro; Michael A Stone
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 7.  Towards Size of Scene in Auditory Scene Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chanbeom Kwak; Woojae Han
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2019-11-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.