Literature DB >> 23322234

Prognostic relevance of AIB1 (NCoA3) amplification and overexpression in breast cancer.

E Burandt1, G Jens, F Holst, F Jänicke, V Müller, A Quaas, M Choschzick, W Wilczak, L Terracciano, R Simon, G Sauter, A Lebeau.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: AIB1 (amplified in breast cancer 1) is an estrogen receptorα (ERα) co-activator, known to be amplified and overexpressed in a fraction of breast cancers. It has been linked to prognosis and tamoxifen resistance. However, results have been ambiguous. The different functions of AIB1 in ERα-positive and -negative disease are poorly understood. Therefore, we analyzed the clinical significance of AIB1 in breast cancer with respect to ERα-status and characterized the subgroups. 2,197 breast carcinomas sampled on a pre-existing tissue microarray (TMA) were analyzed for AIB1 expression and amplification by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).
RESULTS: AIB1 expression was detected in 60 % of the tumors. It was associated with tumor size (p = 0.003), high histological grade (p < 0.0001), poor disease-specific, and overall survival (p = 0.0018 and p = 0.003). There was a strong inverse relationship between AIB1 and ERα expression (p < 0.0001). AIB1 overexpression was associated with increased Ki67 labeling index (p < 0.0001), even if analyzed for different ER expression levels. AIB1 amplification was found in 11 % of the carcinomas. It was associated with high histological grade (p = 0.0012), lymph node involvement (p = 0.0163), and poor disease-specific survival (p = 0.0032) but not with overall survival (p = 0.1672) or ER status (p = 0.4456). If ER-positive tumors were stratified according to their AIB1 amplification status, there was a significant worse disease-specific survival in cases showing AIB1 amplification (p = 0.0017). AIB1 expression is associated with unfavorable prognosis and tumor phenotype. It seems to unfold its oncogenic potential at least in part independent from its role as an ERα co-activator. AIB1 has an impact on cell cycle regulation in ERα-positive as well as ERα-negative tumors. Furthermore, AIB1 amplification characterizes a subgroup of ERα-positive breast cancer with worse outcome. Therefore, AIB1 might be helpful to identify those ERα-positive breast cancers patients who are candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23322234     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2406-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  17 in total

1.  Estrogen receptor coregulator binding modulators (ERXs) effectively target estrogen receptor positive human breast cancers.

Authors:  Ganesh V Raj; Gangadhara Reddy Sareddy; Shihong Ma; Tae-Kyung Lee; Suryavathi Viswanadhapalli; Rui Li; Xihui Liu; Shino Murakami; Chien-Cheng Chen; Wan-Ru Lee; Monica Mann; Samaya Rajeshwari Krishnan; Bikash Manandhar; Vijay K Gonugunta; Douglas Strand; Rajeshwar Rao Tekmal; Jung-Mo Ahn; Ratna K Vadlamudi
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  8p deletion is strongly linked to poor prognosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  P Lebok; A Mittenzwei; M Kluth; C Özden; B Taskin; K Hussein; K Möller; A Hartmann; A Lebeau; I Witzel; S Mahner; L Wölber; F Jänicke; S Geist; P Paluchowski; C Wilke; U Heilenkötter; R Simon; G Sauter; L Terracciano; R Krech; A von der Assen; V Müller; E Burandt
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 4.742

3.  MRTF potentiates TEAD-YAP transcriptional activity causing metastasis.

Authors:  Tackhoon Kim; Daehee Hwang; Dahye Lee; Jeong-Hwan Kim; Seon-Young Kim; Dae-Sik Lim
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  The effects of bufadienolides on HER2 overexpressing breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Tianjiao Wang; Lin Mu; Haifeng Jin; Peng Zhang; Yueyue Wang; Xiaochi Ma; Jinjin Pan; Jian Miao; Yuhui Yuan
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-12-12

5.  Steroid Receptor Coactivator-3 (SRC-3/AIB1) as a Novel Therapeutic Target in Triple Negative Breast Cancer and Its Inhibition with a Phospho-Bufalin Prodrug.

Authors:  Xianzhou Song; Chengwei Zhang; Mingkun Zhao; Hui Chen; Xing Liu; Jianwei Chen; David M Lonard; Li Qin; Jianming Xu; Xiaosong Wang; Feng Li; Bert W O'Malley; Jin Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Accurate computation of survival statistics in genome-wide studies.

Authors:  Fabio Vandin; Alexandra Papoutsaki; Benjamin J Raphael; Eli Upfal
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 7.  Antiestrogens: structure-activity relationships and use in breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  T Traboulsi; M El Ezzy; J L Gleason; S Mader
Journal:  J Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 5.098

8.  Systems level-based RNAi screening by high content analysis identifies UBR5 as a regulator of estrogen receptor-α protein levels and activity.

Authors:  M J Bolt; F Stossi; A M Callison; M G Mancini; R Dandekar; M A Mancini
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  PELP1/SRC-3-dependent regulation of metabolic PFKFB kinases drives therapy resistant ER+ breast cancer.

Authors:  Carol A Lange; Julie H Ostrander; Thu H Truong; Elizabeth A Benner; Kyla M Hagen; Nuri A Temiz; Carlos Perez Kerkvliet; Ying Wang; Emilio Cortes-Sanchez; Chieh-Hsiang Yang; Marygrace C Trousdell; Thomas Pengo; Katrin P Guillen; Bryan E Welm; Camila O Dos Santos; Sucheta Telang
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 8.756

10.  High levels of class III β-tubulin expression are associated with aggressive tumor features in breast cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Lebok; Melike Öztürk; Uwe Heilenkötter; Fritz Jaenicke; Volkmar Müller; Peter Paluchowski; Stefan Geist; Christian Wilke; Eicke Burandt; Annette Lebeau; Waldemar Wilczak; Till Krech; Ronald Simon; Guido Sauter; Alexander Quaas
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.