Literature DB >> 25960407

The origin of consistent protein structure refinement from structural averaging.

Hahnbeom Park1, Frank DiMaio1, David Baker2.   

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that explicit solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulation followed by structural averaging can consistently improve protein structure models. We find that improvement upon averaging is not limited to explicit water MD simulation, as consistent improvements are also observed for more efficient implicit solvent MD or Monte Carlo minimization simulations. To determine the origin of these improvements, we examine the changes in model accuracy brought about by averaging at the individual residue level. We find that the improvement in model quality from averaging results from the superposition of two effects: a dampening of deviations from the correct structure in the least well modeled regions, and a reinforcement of consistent movements towards the correct structure in better modeled regions. These observations are consistent with an energy landscape model in which the magnitude of the energy gradient toward the native structure decreases with increasing distance from the native state.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25960407      PMCID: PMC4456269          DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2015.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Structure        ISSN: 0969-2126            Impact factor:   5.006


  25 in total

1.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution.

Authors:  T Lazaridis; M Karplus
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-05-01

2.  Studies on protein folding, unfolding and fluctuations by computer simulation. I. The effect of specific amino acid sequence represented by specific inter-unit interactions.

Authors:  H Taketomi; Y Ueda; N Gō
Journal:  Int J Pept Protein Res       Date:  1975

3.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD.

Authors:  James C Phillips; Rosemary Braun; Wei Wang; James Gumbart; Emad Tajkhorshid; Elizabeth Villa; Christophe Chipot; Robert D Skeel; Laxmikant Kalé; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Assessment of CASP7 predictions for template-based modeling targets.

Authors:  Jürgen Kopp; Lorenza Bordoli; James N D Battey; Florian Kiefer; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007

5.  Relaxation of backbone bond geometry improves protein energy landscape modeling.

Authors:  Patrick Conway; Michael D Tyka; Frank DiMaio; David E Konerding; David Baker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Protein Structure Refinement through Structure Selection and Averaging from Molecular Dynamics Ensembles.

Authors:  Vahid Mirjalili; Michael Feig
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) dihedral angles.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Xiao Zhu; Jihyun Shim; Pedro E M Lopes; Jeetain Mittal; Michael Feig; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography.

Authors:  Vincent B Chen; W Bryan Arendall; Jeffrey J Headd; Daniel A Keedy; Robert M Immormino; Gary J Kapral; Laura W Murray; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-12-21

9.  High-resolution comparative modeling with RosettaCM.

Authors:  Yifan Song; Frank DiMaio; Ray Yu-Ruei Wang; David Kim; Chris Miles; Tj Brunette; James Thompson; David Baker
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  lDDT: a local superposition-free score for comparing protein structures and models using distance difference tests.

Authors:  Valerio Mariani; Marco Biasini; Alessandro Barbato; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  10 in total

1.  Ligand-Binding-Site Structure Refinement Using Molecular Dynamics with Restraints Derived from Predicted Binding Site Templates.

Authors:  Hugo Guterres; Hui Sun Lee; Wonpil Im
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Ligand-Binding-Site Refinement to Generate Reliable Holo Protein Structure Conformations from Apo Structures.

Authors:  Hugo Guterres; Sang-Jun Park; Wei Jiang; Wonpil Im
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Generalized Born Implicit Solvent Models Do Not Reproduce Secondary Structures of De Novo Designed Glu/Lys Peptides.

Authors:  Eric J M Lang; Emily G Baker; Derek N Woolfson; Adrian J Mulholland
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 6.578

4.  Protein structure refinement via molecular-dynamics simulations: What works and what does not?

Authors:  Michael Feig; Vahid Mirjalili
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-08-17

5.  CASP11 refinement experiments with ROSETTA.

Authors:  Hahnbeom Park; Frank DiMaio; David Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-08-14

6.  Modeling the assembly order of multimeric heteroprotein complexes.

Authors:  Lenna X Peterson; Yoichiro Togawa; Juan Esquivel-Rodriguez; Genki Terashi; Charles Christoffer; Amitava Roy; Woong-Hee Shin; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Ensembles generated from crystal structures of single distant homologues solve challenging molecular-replacement cases in AMPLE.

Authors:  Daniel J Rigden; Jens M H Thomas; Felix Simkovic; Adam Simpkin; Martyn D Winn; Olga Mayans; Ronan M Keegan
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 7.652

Review 8.  Methods for the Refinement of Protein Structure 3D Models.

Authors:  Recep Adiyaman; Liam James McGuffin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  High-accuracy refinement using Rosetta in CASP13.

Authors:  Hahnbeom Park; Gyu Rie Lee; David E Kim; Ivan Anishchenko; Qian Cong; David Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-08-05

10.  De novo design of a fluorescence-activating β-barrel.

Authors:  Jiayi Dou; Anastassia A Vorobieva; William Sheffler; Lindsey A Doyle; Hahnbeom Park; Matthew J Bick; Binchen Mao; Glenna W Foight; Min Yen Lee; Lauren A Gagnon; Lauren Carter; Banumathi Sankaran; Sergey Ovchinnikov; Enrique Marcos; Po-Ssu Huang; Joshua C Vaughan; Barry L Stoddard; David Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 49.962

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.