| Literature DB >> 25959144 |
Hyung Suk Kim1, Kyung Chul Moon2, Chang Wook Jeong1, Cheol Kwak1, Hyeon Hoe Kim1, Ja Hyeon Ku1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of histological variants of urothelial carcinoma (UC) on survival outcomes in patients with lymph node (LN) positive UC of the bladder. We reviewed and analyzed the clinical data from 424 patients who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) for UC of the bladder and who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy in our institution between 1991 and 2012. In total, 92 patients (21.7%) had histologically confirmed LN positive disease. In the LN negative group (332 patients), histological variants of UC were not a significant predictor in univariate analysis. However, in the LN positive group, histological variants of UC were a significant independent prognostic factor of overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 3.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.77-7.08, p < 0.001) and cancer specific survival (HR 3.66; 95% CI 1.69-7.90, p = 0.001) in both uni-variate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The presence of histological variants of UC may indicate a worse prognosis in LN positive patients after RC with PLND for UC of the bladder and more aggressive adjuvant therapy may be required for the improvement of postoperative survival.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25959144 PMCID: PMC4427059 DOI: 10.1038/srep09626
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Clinico-pathological parameters of the study cohort and comparative analysis results of parameters between lymph node negative and positive group
| Overall (n = 424) | LN(-) (n = 332) | LN(+) (n = 92) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year), mean ± SD | 63.9 ± 10.2 | 63.8 ± 10.2 | 64.2 ± 10.2 | 0.700 |
| <60 yrs | 125(29.5%) | 97(29.2%) | 28(30.4%) | 0.821 |
| ≥60 yrs | 299(70.5%) | 235(70.8%) | 64(69.6%) | |
| Gender, n (%) | ||||
| Male | 367(86.6%) | 288(86.7%) | 79(85.9%) | 0.827 |
| Female | 57(13.4%) | 44(13.3%) | 13(14.1%) | |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD | 23.3 ± 3.7 | 23.3 ± 2.9 | 23.4 ± 5.8 | 0.777 |
| <25 | 305(71.9%) | 238(72.8%) | 67(73.6%) | 0.873 |
| ≥25 | 113(26.7%) | 89(27.2%) | 24(26.4%) | |
| ASA score, n(%) | ||||
| 0 | 3(0.7%) | 2(0.6%) | 1(1.1%) | 0.328 |
| 1 | 171(40.3%) | 132(40.5%) | 39(43.8%) | |
| 2 | 219(51.7%) | 174(53.4%) | 45(50.6%) | |
| 3 | 21(5.0%) | 18(5.5%) | 3(3.4%) | |
| 4 | 1(0.2%) | 0(0%) | 1(1.1%) | |
| Pathologic T stage, n (%) | ||||
| Non-muscle invasive (pT0/Ta/T1/CIS) | 184(43.4%) | 174(52.4%) | 10(10.9%) | <0.001 |
| Muscle invasive (pT2) | 87(20.5%) | 66(19.9%) | 21(22.8%) | |
| Extravesical (pT3/T4) | 153(36.1%) | 92(22.7%) | 61(66.3%) | |
| Pathologic grade, n(%) | ||||
| Low grade | 70(16.5%) | 65(19.6%) | 5(5.4%) | 0.001 |
| High grade | 353(83.3%) | 266(80.4%) | 87(94.6%) | |
| Carcinoma in situ, n (%) | ||||
| Absent | 303(71.5%) | 232(69.9%) | 71(77.2%) | 0.170 |
| Present | 121(28.5%) | 100(30.1%) | 51(22.8%) | |
| Lymphovascular invasion, n (%) | ||||
| Absent | 279(65.8%) | 249(75.0%) | 30(32.6%) | <0.001 |
| Present | 145(34.2%) | 83(25.0%) | 62(67.4%) | |
| Perivesical margin, n (%) | ||||
| Absent | 414(97.6%) | 330(99.4%) | 84(95.2%) | <0.001 |
| Present | 10(2.4%) | 2(0.6%) | 8(4.8%) | |
| Variant histology of UC, n (%) | ||||
| Absent | 367(86.6%) | 290(87.3%) | 77(83.7%) | 0.363 |
| Present | 57(13.4%) | 42(12.7%) | 15(16.3%) | |
| Extent of PLND, n (%) | ||||
| Limited | 62(14.4%) | 55(16.6%) | 6(6.5%) | 0.009 |
| Standard | 286(67.5%) | 224(67.7%) | 62(67.4%) | |
| Extended | 76(17.9%) | 52(15.7%) | 24(26.1%) | |
| Lymph node status, n (%) | ||||
| N1 | 37(40.2%) | |||
| N2/N3 | 55(59.8%) | |||
| Mean total number of removed LNs ± SD (median, IQR) | 14.8 ± 9.9 (14, 8–20) | 14.3 ± 9.2 (13, 7–20) | 16.6 ± 12.0 (14.5, 8–21.75) | 0.093 |
| Mean total number of positive LNs ± SD (median, IQR) | 3.2 ± 3.0 (2, 1–4) | |||
| Mean % LND ± SD (median, IQR) | 29.3 ± 27.4 (17.8, 8.3–43.2) | |||
| LND, dichotomized, n (%) | ||||
| ≤18 | 46(50.0%) | |||
| >18 | 46(50.0%) | |||
| Adjuvant chemotherapy, n (%) | ||||
| Not done | 311(73.3%) | 281(84.6%) | 30(32.6%) | <0.001 |
| Done | 113(26.7%) | 51(15.4%) | 62(67.4%) | |
| Mean OS f/u duration ± SD, n (%) (median, IQR) | 59.1 ± 52.9 (40, 23–85) | 65.1 ± 55.2 (48, 25–90) | 37.5 ± 36.5 (26, 13–48.25) | <0.001 |
| Alive | 282(66.5%) | 241(72.6%) | 41(44.6%) | <0.001 |
| Death | 142(33.5%) | 91(27.4%) | 51(55.4%) | |
| Mean CSS f/u duration ± SD, n (%) (median, IQR) | 59.1 ± 52.9 (40, 23–85) | 65.1 ± 55.1 (48, 25–90) | 37.5 ± 36.5 (26, 13–48.25) | <0.001 |
| Alive | 320(75.5%) | 273(82.2%) | 47(51.1%) | <0.001 |
| Death | 104(24.5%) | 59(17.8%) | 45(48.9%) |
BMI = body mass index; ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; UC = urothelial carcinoma; PLND = pelvic lymph node dissection; LN = lymph node; LND = lymph node density; OS = overall survival; CSS = cancer specific survival; SD = standard deviation; IQR = interquartile range.
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival (A) and cancer specific survival (B) according to the presence of lymph node (LN) involvement after radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection.
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival (A) and cancer specific survival (B) according to the presence of histological variant of urothelial carcinoma (UC) in lymph node positive group.
Uni-variate and multivariate Cox regression analyses results for evaluating variables associated with overall survival in lymph node positive group
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted HR | 95% CI | p-value | Adjusted HR | 95% CI | p-value | |
| Pathologic T stage | ||||||
| Non-muscle invasive (pT0/Ta/T1/CIS) | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Muscle invasive (pT2) | 1.08 | 0.32–3.59 | 0.898 | 0.87 | 0.22–3.48 | 0.841 |
| Extravesical (pT3/T4) | 3.18 | 1.10–9.13 | 0.032 | 1.23 | 0.33–4.58 | 0.753 |
| Variant histology of UC | ||||||
| Absent | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Present | 3.53 | 1.88–6.64 | <0.001 | 3.54 | 1.77–7.08 | <0.001 |
| CIS | ||||||
| Absent | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Present | 0.42 | 0.18–0.94 | 0.035 | 0.48 | 0.20–1.12 | 0.093 |
| LVI | ||||||
| Absent | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Present | 2.05 | 1.09–3.88 | 0.026 | 2.78 | 1.41–5.47 | 0.003 |
| Pathologic nodal stage | ||||||
| N1 | Reference | |||||
| N2 | 1.70 | 0.94–3.08 | 0.080 | |||
| N3 | 1.78 | 0.59–5.34 | 0.305 | |||
| Number of removed LNs (continuous) | 0.96 | 0.93–0.99 | 0.022 | 0.98 | 0.95–1.01 | 0.335 |
| LND, dichotomized | ||||||
| <18% | Reference | Reference | ||||
| ≥18% | 2.27 | 1.28–4.02 | 0.005 | 2.09 | 1.16–3.77 | 0.013 |
HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval; UC = urothelial carcinoma; CIS = carcinoma in situ; LVI = lymphovascular invasion; LND = lymph node density.
Uni-variate and multivariate Cox regression analyses results for evaluating variables associated with cancer specific survival in lymph node positive group
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted HR | 95% CI | p-value | Adjusted HR | 95% CI | p-value | |
| Pathologic T stage | ||||||
| Non-muscle invasive (pT0/Ta/T1/CIS) | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Muscle invasive (pT2) | 1.06 | 0.27–4.25 | 0.932 | 0.69 | 0.14–3.43 | 0.655 |
| Extravesical (pT3/T4) | 3.66 | 1.12–11.97 | 0.032 | 1.34 | 0.31–5.91 | 0.695 |
| Variant histology of UC | ||||||
| Absent | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Present | 3.48 | 1.77–6.85 | <0.001 | 3.66 | 1.69–7.90 | 0.001 |
| LVI | ||||||
| Absent | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Present | 2.47 | 1.22–5.01 | 0.012 | 3.08 | 1.44–6.58 | 0.004 |
| Pathologic nodal stage | ||||||
| N1 | Reference | |||||
| N2 | 1.80 | 0.95–3.42 | 0.070 | |||
| N3 | 2.14 | 0.70–6.55 | 0.181 | |||
| Number of removed LNs (continuous) | 0.96 | 0.93–0.99 | 0.023 | 0.94 | 0.90–0.98 | 0.006 |
| Number of positive LNs (continuous) | 1.11 | 1.01–1.22 | 0.022 | 1.22 | 1.08–1.38 | 0.001 |
| LND, dichotomized | ||||||
| <18% | Reference | Reference | ||||
| ≥18% | 2.67 | 1.44–4.95 | 0.002 | 1.08 | 0.40–2.90 | 0.879 |
HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval; UC = urothelial carcinoma; LVI = lymphovascular invasion; LND = lymph node density.