Literature DB >> 10037372

The impact of primary stage on survival in patients with lymph node positive bladder cancer.

J Vieweg1, J E Gschwend, H W Herr, W R Fair.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Contemporary series indicate that survival of cystectomy candidates with node positive bladder cancer is favorable when the primary tumor is confined to the bladder wall and lymph node involvement is minimal. However, these series lack node negative controls with a similar tumor stage to determine accurately the true impact of pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical cystectomy on survival.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed disease specific survival in 686 consecutive cystectomy candidates of whom 193 (28.1%) had node positive disease at radical cystectomy. To correct for bias towards higher P category in the node positive group we subdivided groups into organ and nonorgan confined categories to compare outcome between node negative and node positive cases.
RESULTS: The frequency of organ confined disease in node positive cases was 22.8% compared to 59.2% in node negative cases. Although when analyzing the entire group disease specific survival was significantly decreased in node positive cases, after correction for P stage we found no statistically significant differences in survival between N0 and N1 cases in the organ confined group (p = 0.4267). Differences between N0 and N1 cases in nonorgan confined disease were statistically significant (p = 0.0276). Significance levels were more pronounced when cases with N2 or N3 categories were compared with node negative cases. Comparison of survival between node negative and N2 or N3 in either group revealed significant differences indicating limited impact of surgery alone at this disease stage.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with N1 disease seem to benefit from pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical cystectomy as evidenced by similar outcome in those with node negative disease and similar P stage of the primary tumor. However, the observed benefit rapidly disappears when more than 1 lymph node is involved and additional therapy other than surgery seems appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10037372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  16 in total

Review 1.  Lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy for bladder cancer treatment: considerations on relevance and extent.

Authors:  Lars Weisbach; Roland Dahlem; Giuseppe Simone; Jens Hansen; Armin Soave; Oliver Engel; Felix K Chun; Shahrokh F Shariat; Margit Fisch; Michael Rink
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  The role of lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  John P Stein
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Improving outcomes with radical cystectomy for high-grade invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  John P Stein
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  How close are we to establishing standards of lymphadenectomy for invasive bladder cancer?

Authors:  Pankaj P Dangle; Robert R Bahnson; Kamal S Pohar
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2009-08

5.  P27(Kip1) and Ki-67 expression analysis in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Bartosz Dybowski; Jolanta Kupryjańczyk; Alina Rembiszewska; Roman Pykało; Andrzej Borkowski
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2003-09-27

6.  Radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer: long-term results of a standard procedure.

Authors:  John P Stein; Donald G Skinner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-04       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Landmarks in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Niyati Lobo; Chloe Mount; Kawa Omar; Rajesh Nair; Ramesh Thurairaja; Muhammad Shamim Khan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Impact of primary tumour characteristics on the survival of patients with lymph node metastases in bladder cancer following radical cystectomy.

Authors:  G Nabi; A Seth; P N Dogra; A K Hemal; Narmada P Gupta
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 9.  The role of lymph node density in bladder cancer prognostication.

Authors:  Marcus L Quek; Robert C Flanigan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Treatment of locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer.

Authors:  Makarand V Khochikar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.