Literature DB >> 25957347

INPS: predicting the impact of non-synonymous variations on protein stability from sequence.

Piero Fariselli1, Pier Luigi Martelli2, Castrense Savojardo2, Rita Casadio2.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: A tool for reliably predicting the impact of variations on protein stability is extremely important for both protein engineering and for understanding the effects of Mendelian and somatic mutations in the genome. Next Generation Sequencing studies are constantly increasing the number of protein sequences. Given the huge disproportion between protein sequences and structures, there is a need for tools suited to annotate the effect of mutations starting from protein sequence without relying on the structure. Here, we describe INPS, a novel approach for annotating the effect of non-synonymous mutations on the protein stability from its sequence. INPS is based on SVM regression and it is trained to predict the thermodynamic free energy change upon single-point variations in protein sequences.
RESULTS: We show that INPS performs similarly to the state-of-the-art methods based on protein structure when tested in cross-validation on a non-redundant dataset. INPS performs very well also on a newly generated dataset consisting of a number of variations occurring in the tumor suppressor protein p53. Our results suggest that INPS is a tool suited for computing the effect of non-synonymous polymorphisms on protein stability when the protein structure is not available. We also show that INPS predictions are complementary to those of the state-of-the-art, structure-based method mCSM. When the two methods are combined, the overall prediction on the p53 set scores significantly higher than those of the single methods.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The presented method is available as web server at http://inps.biocomp.unibo.it. CONTACT: piero.fariselli@unibo.it SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary Materials are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25957347     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  33 in total

Review 1.  Machine learning, the kidney, and genotype-phenotype analysis.

Authors:  Rachel S G Sealfon; Laura H Mariani; Matthias Kretzler; Olga G Troyanskaya
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  In silico characterization of functional SNP within the oestrogen receptor gene.

Authors:  Maha Rebaï; Ahmed Rebaï
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency Genetic Variants in Malaria Patients in Southwestern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Tamar E Carter; Seleshi Kebede Mekonnen; Karen Lopez; Victoria Bonnell; Lambodhar Damodaran; Abraham Aseffa; Daniel A Janies
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  STRUM: structure-based prediction of protein stability changes upon single-point mutation.

Authors:  Lijun Quan; Qiang Lv; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Prediction of impacts of mutations on protein structure and interactions: SDM, a statistical approach, and mCSM, using machine learning.

Authors:  Arun Prasad Pandurangan; Tom L Blundell
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Assessment of methods for predicting the effects of PTEN and TPMT protein variants.

Authors:  Vikas Pejaver; Giulia Babbi; Rita Casadio; Lukas Folkman; Panagiotis Katsonis; Kunal Kundu; Olivier Lichtarge; Pier Luigi Martelli; Maximilian Miller; John Moult; Lipika R Pal; Castrense Savojardo; Yizhou Yin; Yaoqi Zhou; Predrag Radivojac; Yana Bromberg
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.878

7.  MutaBind estimates and interprets the effects of sequence variants on protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Minghui Li; Franco L Simonetti; Alexander Goncearenco; Anna R Panchenko
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  Objective assessment of the evolutionary action equation for the fitness effect of missense mutations across CAGI-blinded contests.

Authors:  Panagiotis Katsonis; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.878

9.  Are machine learning based methods suited to address complex biological problems? Lessons from CAGI-5 challenges.

Authors:  Castrense Savojardo; Giulia Babbi; Samuele Bovo; Emidio Capriotti; Pier Luigi Martelli; Rita Casadio
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 4.878

10.  SDM: a server for predicting effects of mutations on protein stability.

Authors:  Arun Prasad Pandurangan; Bernardo Ochoa-Montaño; David B Ascher; Tom L Blundell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.