Literature DB >> 28544059

Objective assessment of the evolutionary action equation for the fitness effect of missense mutations across CAGI-blinded contests.

Panagiotis Katsonis1, Olivier Lichtarge1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

A major challenge in genome interpretation is to estimate the fitness effect of coding variants of unknown significance (VUS). Labor, limited understanding of protein functions, and lack of assays generally limit direct experimental assessment of VUS, and make robust and accurate computational approaches a necessity. Often, however, algorithms that predict mutational effect disagree among themselves and with experimental data, slowing their adoption for clinical diagnostics. To objectively assess such methods, the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI) community organizes contests to predict unpublished experimental data, available only to CAGI assessors. We review here the CAGI performance of evolutionary action (EA) predictions of mutational impact. EA models the fitness effect of coding mutations analytically, as a product of the gradient of the fitness landscape times the perturbation size. In practice, these terms are computed from phylogenetic considerations as the functional sensitivity of the mutated site and as the magnitude of amino acid substitution, respectively, and yield the percentage loss of wild-type activity. In five CAGI challenges, EA consistently performed on par or better than sophisticated machine learning approaches. This objective assessment suggests that a simple differential model of evolution can interpret the fitness effect of coding variations, opening diverse clinical applications.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deleterious and neutral; genetic variation fitness; mutation effect prediction; pathogenic and benign; single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP); unbiased performance comparison

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28544059      PMCID: PMC5600169          DOI: 10.1002/humu.23266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  58 in total

1.  An accurate, sensitive, and scalable method to identify functional sites in protein structures.

Authors:  Hui Yao; David M Kristensen; Ivana Mihalek; Mathew E Sowa; Chad Shaw; Marek Kimmel; Lydia Kavraki; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Using SIFT and PolyPhen to predict loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations.

Authors:  Sarah E Flanagan; Ann-Marie Patch; Sian Ellard
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2010-08

3.  Prediction and experimental validation of enzyme substrate specificity in protein structures.

Authors:  Shivas R Amin; Serkan Erdin; R Matthew Ward; Rhonald C Lua; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Natural selection and the concept of a protein space.

Authors:  J M Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-02-07       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The use of orthologous sequences to predict the impact of amino acid substitutions on protein function.

Authors:  Nicholas J Marini; Paul D Thomas; Jasper Rine
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  Understanding the function-structure and function-mutation relationships of p53 tumor suppressor protein by high-resolution missense mutation analysis.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kato; Shuang-Yin Han; Wen Liu; Kazunori Otsuka; Hiroyuki Shibata; Ryunosuke Kanamaru; Chikashi Ishioka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Comparison of predicted and actual consequences of missense mutations.

Authors:  Lisa A Miosge; Matthew A Field; Yovina Sontani; Vicky Cho; Simon Johnson; Anna Palkova; Bhavani Balakishnan; Rong Liang; Yafei Zhang; Stephen Lyon; Bruce Beutler; Belinda Whittle; Edward M Bertram; Anselm Enders; Christopher C Goodnow; T Daniel Andrews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Single nucleotide variations: biological impact and theoretical interpretation.

Authors:  Panagiotis Katsonis; Amanda Koire; Stephen Joseph Wilson; Teng-Kuei Hsu; Rhonald C Lua; Angela Dawn Wilkins; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Identifying Mendelian disease genes with the variant effect scoring tool.

Authors:  Hannah Carter; Christopher Douville; Peter D Stenson; David N Cooper; Rachel Karchin
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  SNAP: predict effect of non-synonymous polymorphisms on function.

Authors:  Yana Bromberg; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  17 in total

1.  Gene-specific features enhance interpretation of mutational impact on acid α-glucosidase enzyme activity.

Authors:  Aashish N Adhikari
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.878

2.  Exploring the use of molecular dynamics in assessing protein variants for phenotypic alterations.

Authors:  Aditi Garg; Debnath Pal
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 4.878

3.  Predicting pathogenicity of missense variants with weakly supervised regression.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Yuanfei Sun; Mostafa Karimi; Haoran Chen; Oluwaseyi Moronfoye; Yang Shen
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.878

4.  Reports from CAGI: The Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation.

Authors:  Roger A Hoskins; Susanna Repo; Daniel Barsky; Gaia Andreoletti; John Moult; Steven E Brenner
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.878

5.  Matching whole genomes to rare genetic disorders: Identification of potential causative variants using phenotype-weighted knowledge in the CAGI SickKids5 clinical genomes challenge.

Authors:  Lipika R Pal; Kunal Kundu; Yizhou Yin; John Moult
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.878

6.  Identification of risk genes for Alzheimer's disease by gene embedding.

Authors:  Yashwanth Lagisetty; Thomas Bourquard; Ismael Al-Ramahi; Carl Grant Mangleburg; Samantha Mota; Shirin Soleimani; Joshua M Shulman; Juan Botas; Kwanghyuk Lee; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  Cell Genom       Date:  2022-07-26

7.  Human muscle-specific A-kinase anchoring protein polymorphisms modulate the susceptibility to cardiovascular diseases by altering cAMP/PKA signaling.

Authors:  Santosh V Suryavanshi; Shweta M Jadhav; Kody L Anderson; Panagiotis Katsonis; Olivier Lichtarge; Bradley K McConnell
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.733

8.  A method to delineate de novo missense variants across pathways prioritizes genes linked to autism.

Authors:  Amanda Koire; Panagiotis Katsonis; Young Won Kim; Christie Buchovecky; Stephen J Wilson; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  A general calculus of fitness landscapes finds genes under selection in cancers.

Authors:  Teng-Kuei Hsu; Jennifer Asmussen; Amanda Koire; Byung-Kwon Choi; Mayur A Gadhikar; Eunna Huh; Chih-Hsu Lin; Daniel M Konecki; Young Won Kim; Curtis R Pickering; Marek Kimmel; Lawrence A Donehower; Mitchell J Frederick; Jeffrey N Myers; Panagiotis Katsonis; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 9.438

10.  A Mild PUM1 Mutation Is Associated with Adult-Onset Ataxia, whereas Haploinsufficiency Causes Developmental Delay and Seizures.

Authors:  Vincenzo A Gennarino; Elizabeth E Palmer; Laura M McDonell; Li Wang; Carolyn J Adamski; Amanda Koire; Lauren See; Chun-An Chen; Christian P Schaaf; Jill A Rosenfeld; Jessica A Panzer; Ute Moog; Shuang Hao; Ann Bye; Edwin P Kirk; Pawel Stankiewicz; Amy M Breman; Arran McBride; Tejaswi Kandula; Holly A Dubbs; Rebecca Macintosh; Michael Cardamone; Ying Zhu; Kevin Ying; Kerith-Rae Dias; Megan T Cho; Lindsay B Henderson; Berivan Baskin; Paula Morris; Jiang Tao; Mark J Cowley; Marcel E Dinger; Tony Roscioli; Oana Caluseriu; Oksana Suchowersky; Rani K Sachdev; Olivier Lichtarge; Jianrong Tang; Kym M Boycott; J Lloyd Holder; Huda Y Zoghbi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 66.850

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.