Literature DB >> 25957035

Evolution of water chemistry during Marcellus Shale gas development: A case study in West Virginia.

Paul F Ziemkiewicz1, Y Thomas He2.   

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing (HF) has been used with horizontal drilling to extract gas and natural gas liquids from source rock such as the Marcellus Shale in the Appalachian Basin. Horizontal drilling and HF generates large volumes of waste water known as flowback. While inorganic ion chemistry has been well characterized, and the general increase in concentration through the flowback is widely recognized, the literature contains little information relative to organic compounds and radionuclides. This study examined the chemical evolution of liquid process and waste streams (including makeup water, HF fluids, and flowback) in four Marcellus Shale gas well sites in north central West Virginia. Concentrations of organic and inorganic constituents and radioactive isotopes were measured to determine changes in waste water chemistry during shale gas development. We found that additives used in fracturing fluid may contribute to some of the constituents (e.g., Fe) found in flowback, but they appear to play a minor role. Time sequence samples collected during flowback indicated increasing concentrations of organic, inorganic and radioactive constituents. Nearly all constituents were found in much higher concentrations in flowback water than in injected HF fluids suggesting that the bulk of constituents originate in the Marcellus Shale formation rather than in the formulation of the injected HF fluids. Liquid wastes such as flowback and produced water, are largely recycled for subsequent fracturing operations. These practices limit environmental exposure to flowback.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Environmental impact; Flowback; Marcellus Shale; Water chemistry evolution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25957035     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.04.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  5 in total

Review 1.  Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010-2015).

Authors:  Daniele Costa; João Jesus; David Branco; Anthony Danko; António Fiúza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Organic Pollutants in Shale Gas Flowback and Produced Waters: Identification, Potential Ecological Impact, and Implications for Treatment Strategies.

Authors:  Andrii Butkovskyi; Harry Bruning; Stefan A E Kools; Huub H M Rijnaarts; Annemarie P Van Wezel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Partitioning of naturally-occurring radionuclides (NORM) in Marcellus Shale produced fluids influenced by chemical matrix.

Authors:  Andrew W Nelson; Adam J Johns; Eric S Eitrheim; Andrew W Knight; Madeline Basile; E Arthur Bettis; Michael K Schultz; Tori Z Forbes
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 4.238

Review 4.  Critical evaluation of human health risks due to hydraulic fracturing in natural gas and petroleum production.

Authors:  Klaus-Michael Wollin; G Damm; H Foth; A Freyberger; T Gebel; A Mangerich; U Gundert-Remy; F Partosch; C Röhl; T Schupp; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  Shale gas development has limited effects on stream biology and geochemistry in a gradient-based, multiparameter study in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Adam C Mumford; Kelly O Maloney; Denise M Akob; Sarah Nettemann; Arianne Proctor; Jason Ditty; Luke Ulsamer; Josh Lookenbill; Isabelle M Cozzarelli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.