Literature DB >> 25956866

Biochemical mechanism of DSB end resection and its regulation.

James M Daley1, Hengyao Niu2, Adam S Miller3, Patrick Sung3.   

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in cells can undergo nucleolytic degradation to generate long 3' single-stranded DNA tails. This process is termed DNA end resection, and its occurrence effectively commits to break repair via homologous recombination, which entails the acquisition of genetic information from an intact, homologous donor DNA sequence. Recent advances, prompted by the identification of the nucleases that catalyze resection, have revealed intricate layers of functional redundancy, interconnectedness, and regulation. Here, we review the current state of the field with an emphasis on the major questions that remain to be answered. Topics addressed will include how resection initiates via the introduction of an endonucleolytic incision close to the break end, the molecular mechanism of the conserved MRE11 complex in conjunction with Sae2/CtIP within such a model, the role of BRCA1 and 53BP1 in regulating resection initiation in mammalian cells, the influence of chromatin in the resection process, and potential roles of novel factors.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Double-strand breaks; Helicases; Nucleases; Recombination; Resection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25956866      PMCID: PMC4522330          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  155 in total

1.  Ku70 corrupts DNA repair in the absence of the Fanconi anemia pathway.

Authors:  Paul Pace; Georgina Mosedale; Michael R Hodskinson; Ivan V Rosado; Meera Sivasubramaniam; Ketan J Patel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Playing the end game: DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice.

Authors:  J Ross Chapman; Martin R G Taylor; Simon J Boulton
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  RNF168 ubiquitinates K13-15 on H2A/H2AX to drive DNA damage signaling.

Authors:  Francesca Mattiroli; Joseph H A Vissers; Willem J van Dijk; Pauline Ikpa; Elisabetta Citterio; Wim Vermeulen; Jurgen A Marteijn; Titia K Sixma
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in Brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks.

Authors:  Samuel F Bunting; Elsa Callén; Nancy Wong; Hua-Tang Chen; Federica Polato; Amanda Gunn; Anne Bothmer; Niklas Feldhahn; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo; Liu Cao; Xiaoling Xu; Chu-Xia Deng; Toren Finkel; Michel Nussenzweig; Jeremy M Stark; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Expanded roles of the Fanconi anemia pathway in preserving genomic stability.

Authors:  Younghoon Kee; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Site-specific DICER and DROSHA RNA products control the DNA-damage response.

Authors:  Sofia Francia; Flavia Michelini; Alka Saxena; Dave Tang; Michiel de Hoon; Viviana Anelli; Marina Mione; Piero Carninci; Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  53BP1 loss rescues BRCA1 deficiency and is associated with triple-negative and BRCA-mutated breast cancers.

Authors:  Peter Bouwman; Amal Aly; Jose M Escandell; Mark Pieterse; Jirina Bartkova; Hanneke van der Gulden; Sanne Hiddingh; Maria Thanasoula; Atul Kulkarni; Qifeng Yang; Bruce G Haffty; Johanna Tommiska; Carl Blomqvist; Ronny Drapkin; David J Adams; Heli Nevanlinna; Jiri Bartek; Madalena Tarsounas; Shridar Ganesan; Jos Jonkers
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 15.369

8.  Collaborative action of Brca1 and CtIP in elimination of covalent modifications from double-strand breaks to facilitate subsequent break repair.

Authors:  Kyoko Nakamura; Toshiaki Kogame; Hiroyuki Oshiumi; Akira Shinohara; Yoshiki Sumitomo; Keli Agama; Yves Pommier; Kimiko M Tsutsui; Ken Tsutsui; Edgar Hartsuiker; Tomoo Ogi; Shunichi Takeda; Yoshihito Taniguchi
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  CDK targeting of NBS1 promotes DNA-end resection, replication restart and homologous recombination.

Authors:  Jacob Falck; Josep V Forment; Julia Coates; Martin Mistrik; Jiri Lukas; Jiri Bartek; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 8.807

10.  Complex landscapes of somatic rearrangement in human breast cancer genomes.

Authors:  Philip J Stephens; David J McBride; Meng-Lay Lin; Ignacio Varela; Erin D Pleasance; Jared T Simpson; Lucy A Stebbings; Catherine Leroy; Sarah Edkins; Laura J Mudie; Chris D Greenman; Mingming Jia; Calli Latimer; Jon W Teague; King Wai Lau; John Burton; Michael A Quail; Harold Swerdlow; Carol Churcher; Rachael Natrajan; Anieta M Sieuwerts; John W M Martens; Daniel P Silver; Anita Langerød; Hege E G Russnes; John A Foekens; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Laura van 't Veer; Andrea L Richardson; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Peter J Campbell; P Andrew Futreal; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  65 in total

1.  Chromatin Modifiers Alter Recombination Between Divergent DNA Sequences.

Authors:  Ujani Chakraborty; Beata Mackenroth; David Shalloway; Eric Alani
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Cdc24 Is Essential for Long-range End Resection in the Repair of Double-stranded DNA Breaks.

Authors:  Huimin Zhang; Yu Hua; Rui Li; Daochun Kong
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  DNA-damage-induced degradation of EXO1 exonuclease limits DNA end resection to ensure accurate DNA repair.

Authors:  Nozomi Tomimatsu; Bipasha Mukherjee; Janelle Louise Harris; Francesca Ludovica Boffo; Molly Catherine Hardebeck; Patrick Ryan Potts; Kum Kum Khanna; Sandeep Burma
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Consider the workhorse: Nonhomologous end-joining in budding yeast.

Authors:  Charlene H Emerson; Alison A Bertuch
Journal:  Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.626

5.  Poly(ADP-ribose)-binding promotes Exo1 damage recruitment and suppresses its nuclease activities.

Authors:  Abigael Cheruiyot; Sharad C Paudyal; In-Kwon Kim; Melanie Sparks; Tom Ellenberger; Helen Piwnica-Worms; Zhongsheng You
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2015-09-30

6.  The Lys63-deubiquitylating Enzyme BRCC36 Limits DNA Break Processing and Repair.

Authors:  Hoi-Man Ng; Leizhen Wei; Li Lan; Michael S Y Huen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  The molecular basis and disease relevance of non-homologous DNA end joining.

Authors:  Bailin Zhao; Eli Rothenberg; Dale A Ramsden; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 8.  Nonhomologous DNA end-joining for repair of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Nicholas R Pannunzio; Go Watanabe; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Non-homologous DNA end joining and alternative pathways to double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Howard H Y Chang; Nicholas R Pannunzio; Noritaka Adachi; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 94.444

10.  Genetic and biochemical evidences reveal novel insights into the mechanism underlying Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2-mediated abrogation of DNA replication stress.

Authors:  Indrajeet Ghodke; K Muniyappa
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.