Hiok Hong Chan1, Yang Zhao2, Tin A Tun3, Louis Tong4. 1. Singapore National Eye Center, 11 Third Hospital Avenue, Singapore 168751, Singapore. 2. Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Singapore. Electronic address: zhaoyang.work@gmail.com. 3. Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore 168751, Singapore. 4. Ocular Surface Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore 168751, Singapore; Department of Cornea and External Eye Disease, Singapore National Eye Center, 11 Third Hospital Avenue, Singapore 168751, Singapore; Office of Clinical, Academic and Faculty Affairs, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore; Department of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the intra-rater, inter-rater and inter-device repeatability of a spectral-domain OCT (Cirrus) and a time-domain OCT (Visante) for tear meniscus height (TMH) and area (TMA) measurements. METHODS: 20 participants with no known eye disease were recruited. Both eyes of participants were imaged with both OCTs under the similar conditions. The inferior tear meniscus was imaged at 6 o'clock position whereas the superior meniscus was imaged at 12 o'clock position. Data from the right eyes was analyzed. Two raters independently measured TMH and TMA using the OCT images, and one rater repeated the measurements. Intra-rater, inter-rater and inter-device repeatability of measurements were assessed using Bland-Altman plots and pooled standard deviation. RESULTS: For intra-rater repeatability, TMH and TMA measurements were more repeatable in Cirrus than Visante (95% limits of agreement (LOA): TMH (μm), -22 to 66 (Cirrus), -125 to 45 (Visante); TMA (μm(2)), -1632 to 5331 (Cirrus), -38,050 to 21,874 (Visante)). For inter-rater agreement, TMH and TMA were also more repeatable in Cirrus than Visante (95%LOA: TMH (μm), -29 to 107 (Cirrus), -215 to 252 (Visante); TMA (μm(2)), -6650 to 9567 (Cirrus), -33,119 to 39,272 (Visante)). Inter-device agreement was poor (95%LOA: TMH (μm), -158 to 150; TMA (μm(2)), -32,903 to 14,076). There was no significant difference in inferior TMH between Cirrus and Visante (p>0.05). Inferior TMA was significantly lower in Cirrus by a mean difference of 10,223μm(2) (95% confidence interval, 5479, 14,966) (p=0.0002). CONCLUSION: Spectral-domain OCT is superior to time-domain OCT for intra-rater and inter-rater repeatability of TMH and TMA measurements.
PURPOSE: To investigate the intra-rater, inter-rater and inter-device repeatability of a spectral-domain OCT (Cirrus) and a time-domain OCT (Visante) for tear meniscus height (TMH) and area (TMA) measurements. METHODS: 20 participants with no known eye disease were recruited. Both eyes of participants were imaged with both OCTs under the similar conditions. The inferior tear meniscus was imaged at 6 o'clock position whereas the superior meniscus was imaged at 12 o'clock position. Data from the right eyes was analyzed. Two raters independently measured TMH and TMA using the OCT images, and one rater repeated the measurements. Intra-rater, inter-rater and inter-device repeatability of measurements were assessed using Bland-Altman plots and pooled standard deviation. RESULTS: For intra-rater repeatability, TMH and TMA measurements were more repeatable in Cirrus than Visante (95% limits of agreement (LOA): TMH (μm), -22 to 66 (Cirrus), -125 to 45 (Visante); TMA (μm(2)), -1632 to 5331 (Cirrus), -38,050 to 21,874 (Visante)). For inter-rater agreement, TMH and TMA were also more repeatable in Cirrus than Visante (95%LOA: TMH (μm), -29 to 107 (Cirrus), -215 to 252 (Visante); TMA (μm(2)), -6650 to 9567 (Cirrus), -33,119 to 39,272 (Visante)). Inter-device agreement was poor (95%LOA: TMH (μm), -158 to 150; TMA (μm(2)), -32,903 to 14,076). There was no significant difference in inferior TMH between Cirrus and Visante (p>0.05). Inferior TMA was significantly lower in Cirrus by a mean difference of 10,223μm(2) (95% confidence interval, 5479, 14,966) (p=0.0002). CONCLUSION: Spectral-domain OCT is superior to time-domain OCT for intra-rater and inter-rater repeatability of TMH and TMA measurements.
Authors: Hannes Stegmann; René M Werkmeister; Martin Pfister; Gerhard Garhöfer; Leopold Schmetterer; Valentin Aranha Dos Santos Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: John A Gonzales; Stephen C Shiboski; Vatinee Y Bunya; Esen K Akpek; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; Gerami D Seitzman; Lindsey A Criswell; Caroline H Shiboski; Thomas M Lietman Journal: Cornea Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 3.152