Literature DB >> 25954947

Nonlinear spike-and-slab sparse coding for interpretable image encoding.

Jacquelyn A Shelton1, Abdul-Saboor Sheikh2, Jörg Bornschein3, Philip Sterne4, Jörg Lücke5.   

Abstract

Sparse coding is a popular approach to model natural images but has faced two main challenges: modelling low-level image components (such as edge-like structures and their occlusions) and modelling varying pixel intensities. Traditionally, images are modelled as a sparse linear superposition of dictionary elements, where the probabilistic view of this problem is that the coefficients follow a Laplace or Cauchy prior distribution. We propose a novel model that instead uses a spike-and-slab prior and nonlinear combination of components. With the prior, our model can easily represent exact zeros for e.g. the absence of an image component, such as an edge, and a distribution over non-zero pixel intensities. With the nonlinearity (the nonlinear max combination rule), the idea is to target occlusions; dictionary elements correspond to image components that can occlude each other. There are major consequences of the model assumptions made by both (non)linear approaches, thus the main goal of this paper is to isolate and highlight differences between them. Parameter optimization is analytically and computationally intractable in our model, thus as a main contribution we design an exact Gibbs sampler for efficient inference which we can apply to higher dimensional data using latent variable preselection. Results on natural and artificial occlusion-rich data with controlled forms of sparse structure show that our model can extract a sparse set of edge-like components that closely match the generating process, which we refer to as interpretable components. Furthermore, the sparseness of the solution closely follows the ground-truth number of components/edges in the images. The linear model did not learn such edge-like components with any level of sparsity. This suggests that our model can adaptively well-approximate and characterize the meaningful generation process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25954947      PMCID: PMC4425358          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  10 in total

1.  Spatial structure and symmetry of simple-cell receptive fields in macaque primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Dario L Ringach
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Receptive fields and response properties of neurons in layer 4 of ferret visual cortex.

Authors:  W Martin Usrey; Michael P Sceniak; Barbara Chapman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex.

Authors:  D H HUBEL; T N WIESEL
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1959-10       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images.

Authors:  B A Olshausen; D J Field
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-06-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  J H van Hateren; A van der Schaaf
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: a strategy employed by V1?

Authors:  B A Olshausen; D J Field
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Spontaneous cortical activity reveals hallmarks of an optimal internal model of the environment.

Authors:  Pietro Berkes; Gergo Orbán; Máté Lengyel; József Fiser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Highly selective receptive fields in mouse visual cortex.

Authors:  Cristopher M Niell; Michael P Stryker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Scaling up spike-and-slab models for unsupervised feature learning.

Authors:  Ian J Goodfellow; Aaron Courville; Yoshua Bengio
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.226

10.  Are v1 simple cells optimized for visual occlusions? A comparative study.

Authors:  Jörg Bornschein; Marc Henniges; Jörg Lücke
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 4.475

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Group spike-and-slab lasso generalized linear models for disease prediction and associated genes detection by incorporating pathway information.

Authors:  Zaixiang Tang; Yueping Shen; Yan Li; Xinyan Zhang; Jia Wen; Chen'ao Qian; Wenzhuo Zhuang; Xinghua Shi; Nengjun Yi
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  The Spike-and-Slab Lasso Generalized Linear Models for Prediction and Associated Genes Detection.

Authors:  Zaixiang Tang; Yueping Shen; Xinyan Zhang; Nengjun Yi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Inference and Learning in a Latent Variable Model for Beta Distributed Interval Data.

Authors:  Hamid Mousavi; Mareike Buhl; Enrico Guiraud; Jakob Drefs; Jörg Lücke
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.524

4.  STRFs in primary auditory cortex emerge from masking-based statistics of natural sounds.

Authors:  Abdul-Saboor Sheikh; Nicol S Harper; Jakob Drefs; Yosef Singer; Zhenwen Dai; Richard E Turner; Jörg Lücke
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 5.  Encoding and Decoding Models in Cognitive Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Christopher R Holdgraf; Jochem W Rieger; Cristiano Micheli; Stephanie Martin; Robert T Knight; Frederic E Theunissen
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.