Paul S de Vries1, Maryam Kavousi1, Symen Ligthart1, André G Uitterlinden2, Albert Hofman1, Oscar H Franco1, Abbas Dehghan3. 1. Department of Epidemiology, and Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Epidemiology, and Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Department of Epidemiology, and Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Epidemiology, and Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands a.dehghan@erasmusmc.nl.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the incremental predictive value of genetic risk scores of coronary heart disease (CHD) in the 10-year risk prediction of incident CHD. METHODS: In 5899 subjects, we used 152 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with coronary artery disease by the CARDIoGRAMplusC4D consortium to construct three weighted genetic risk scores: (i) GRS(gws) based on 49 genome-wide significant SNPs; (ii) GRS(fdr) based on 103 suggestively associated SNPs; and (iii) GRS(all) based on all 152 SNPs. We examined the changes in discrimination and reclassification of incident CHD when adding the genetic risk scores to models including traditional risk factors. We repeated the analysis for prevalent CHD. RESULTS: The genetic risk scores were associated with incident CHD despite adjustment for traditional risk factors and family history: participants had a 13% higher rate of CHD per standard deviation increase in GRS(all). GRS(all )improved the C-statistic by 0.006 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.000, 0.013] beyond age and sex, 0.003 (95% CI: -0.001, 0.008) beyond traditional risk factors and 0.003 (95% CI: -0.001, 0.007) beyond traditional risk factors and family history. The genetic risk scores did not improve reclassification. GRS(all) strongly improved both discrimination and reclassification of prevalent CHD, even beyond traditional risk factors and family history, with a C-statistic improvement of 0.009 (0.003, 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Although the genetic risk scores based on 152 SNPs were associated with incident CHD, they did not improve risk prediction. This discrepancy may be the result of SNP discovery for prevalent rather than incident CHD, since the SNPs do improve prediction for prevalent disease.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the incremental predictive value of genetic risk scores of coronary heart disease (CHD) in the 10-year risk prediction of incident CHD. METHODS: In 5899 subjects, we used 152 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with coronary artery disease by the CARDIoGRAMplusC4D consortium to construct three weighted genetic risk scores: (i) GRS(gws) based on 49 genome-wide significant SNPs; (ii) GRS(fdr) based on 103 suggestively associated SNPs; and (iii) GRS(all) based on all 152 SNPs. We examined the changes in discrimination and reclassification of incident CHD when adding the genetic risk scores to models including traditional risk factors. We repeated the analysis for prevalent CHD. RESULTS: The genetic risk scores were associated with incident CHD despite adjustment for traditional risk factors and family history: participants had a 13% higher rate of CHD per standard deviation increase in GRS(all). GRS(all )improved the C-statistic by 0.006 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.000, 0.013] beyond age and sex, 0.003 (95% CI: -0.001, 0.008) beyond traditional risk factors and 0.003 (95% CI: -0.001, 0.007) beyond traditional risk factors and family history. The genetic risk scores did not improve reclassification. GRS(all) strongly improved both discrimination and reclassification of prevalent CHD, even beyond traditional risk factors and family history, with a C-statistic improvement of 0.009 (0.003, 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Although the genetic risk scores based on 152 SNPs were associated with incident CHD, they did not improve risk prediction. This discrepancy may be the result of SNP discovery for prevalent rather than incident CHD, since the SNPs do improve prediction for prevalent disease.
Authors: Albert Hofman; Guy G O Brusselle; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; M Arfan Ikram; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning W Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2015-09-19 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: M Arfan Ikram; Guy G O Brusselle; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Stricker; Henning Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij; Albert Hofman Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2017-10-24 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Andy B Castaneda; Lauren E Petty; Markus Scholz; Rick Jansen; Stefan Weiss; Xiaoling Zhang; Katharina Schramm; Frank Beutner; Holger Kirsten; Ulf Schminke; Shih-Jen Hwang; Carola Marzi; Klodian Dhana; Adrie Seldenrijk; Knut Krohn; Georg Homuth; Petra Wolf; Marjolein J Peters; Marcus Dörr; Annette Peters; Joyce B J van Meurs; André G Uitterlinden; Maryam Kavousi; Daniel Levy; Christian Herder; Gerard van Grootheest; Melanie Waldenberger; Christa Meisinger; Wolfgang Rathmann; Joachim Thiery; Joseph Polak; Wolfgang Koenig; Jochen Seissler; Joshua C Bis; Nora Franceshini; Claudia Giambartolomei; Albert Hofman; Oscar H Franco; Brenda W J H Penninx; Holger Prokisch; Henry Völzke; Markus Loeffler; Christopher J O'Donnell; Jennifer E Below; Abbas Dehghan; Paul S de Vries Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2022-03-31 Impact factor: 5.121
Authors: Abbas Dehghan; Joshua C Bis; Charles C White; Albert Vernon Smith; Alanna C Morrison; L Adrienne Cupples; Stella Trompet; Daniel I Chasman; Thomas Lumley; Uwe Völker; Brendan M Buckley; Jingzhong Ding; Majken K Jensen; Aaron R Folsom; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Cynthia J Girman; Ian Ford; Marcus Dörr; Veikko Salomaa; André G Uitterlinden; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Ramachandran S Vasan; Nora Franceschini; Cara L Carty; Jarmo Virtamo; Serkalem Demissie; Philippe Amouyel; Dominique Arveiler; Susan R Heckbert; Jean Ferrières; Pierre Ducimetière; Nicholas L Smith; Ying A Wang; David S Siscovick; Kenneth M Rice; Per-Gunnar Wiklund; Kent D Taylor; Alun Evans; Frank Kee; Jerome I Rotter; Juha Karvanen; Kari Kuulasmaa; Gerardo Heiss; Peter Kraft; Lenore J Launer; Albert Hofman; Marcello R P Markus; Lynda M Rose; Kaisa Silander; Peter Wagner; Emelia J Benjamin; Kurt Lohman; David J Stott; Fernando Rivadeneira; Tamara B Harris; Daniel Levy; Yongmei Liu; Eric B Rimm; J Wouter Jukema; Henry Völzke; Paul M Ridker; Stefan Blankenberg; Oscar H Franco; Vilmundur Gudnason; Bruce M Psaty; Eric Boerwinkle; Christopher J O'Donnell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Richard W Morris; Jackie A Cooper; Tina Shah; Andrew Wong; Fotios Drenos; Jorgen Engmann; Stela McLachlan; Barbara Jefferis; Caroline Dale; Rebecca Hardy; Diana Kuh; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; S Goya Wannamethee; Peter H Whincup; Juan-Pablo Casas; Mika Kivimaki; Meena Kumari; Philippa J Talmud; Jacqueline F Price; Frank Dudbridge; Aroon D Hingorani; Steve E Humphries Journal: Heart Date: 2016-06-30 Impact factor: 5.994