Literature DB >> 25953732

Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Analysis of Late Relapse Using Comparative Karyotype and Chromosome Genome Array Testing.

Cecilia C S Yeung1,2,3, Aaron T Gerds4, Min Fang1,2,3, Bart L Scott1,5,3, Mary E D Flowers1,5,3, Ted Gooley1,6, H Joachim Deeg1,5,3.   

Abstract

Relapse is a major cause of failure after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We analyzed the relapse pattern in 1007 patients who underwent transplantation for MDS to identify factors that may determine the timing of relapse. Overall, 254 patients relapsed: 213 before 18 months and 41 later than 18 months after HCT, a time point frequently used in clinical trials. The hazard of relapse declined progressively with time since transplantation. A higher proportion of patients with early relapse had high-risk cytogenetics compared with patients with late relapse (P = .009). Patients with late relapse had suggestively longer postrelapse survival than patients who relapsed early, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = .07). Among 41 late relapsing patients, sequential cytogenetic data were available in 36. In 41% of these, new clonal abnormalities in addition to pre-HCT findings were identified at relapse; in 30% pre-HCT abnormalities were replaced by new clones, in 17.3% the same clone was present before HCT and at relapse, and in 9.7%, no abnormalities were present either before HCT or at relapse. Comparative chromosomal genomic array testing in 3 patients with late relapse showed molecular differences not detectable by cytogenetics between the pre-HCT clones and the clones at relapse. These data show that late relapses are not infrequent in patients who undergo transplantation for MDS. The pattern of new cytogenetic alterations at late relapse is similar to that observed in patients with early relapse and supports the concept that MDS relapse early and late after HCT is frequently due to the emergence of clones not detectable before HCT.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation; Comparative chromosomal genomic array testing; Late relapse; Myelodysplastic syndromes

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25953732      PMCID: PMC4772678          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.04.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  38 in total

Review 1.  Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators.

Authors:  T A Gooley; W Leisenring; J Crowley; B E Storer
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Comprehensive array CGH of normal karyotype myelodysplastic syndromes reveals hidden recurrent and individual genomic copy number alterations with prognostic relevance.

Authors:  A Thiel; M Beier; D Ingenhag; K Servan; M Hein; V Moeller; B Betz; B Hildebrandt; C Evers; U Germing; B Royer-Pokora
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  The origin and evolution of mutations in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  John S Welch; Timothy J Ley; Daniel C Link; Christopher A Miller; David E Larson; Daniel C Koboldt; Lukas D Wartman; Tamara L Lamprecht; Fulu Liu; Jun Xia; Cyriac Kandoth; Robert S Fulton; Michael D McLellan; David J Dooling; John W Wallis; Ken Chen; Christopher C Harris; Heather K Schmidt; Joelle M Kalicki-Veizer; Charles Lu; Qunyuan Zhang; Ling Lin; Michelle D O'Laughlin; Joshua F McMichael; Kim D Delehaunty; Lucinda A Fulton; Vincent J Magrini; Sean D McGrath; Ryan T Demeter; Tammi L Vickery; Jasreet Hundal; Lisa L Cook; Gary W Swift; Jerry P Reed; Patricia A Alldredge; Todd N Wylie; Jason R Walker; Mark A Watson; Sharon E Heath; William D Shannon; Nobish Varghese; Rakesh Nagarajan; Jacqueline E Payton; Jack D Baty; Shashikant Kulkarni; Jeffery M Klco; Michael H Tomasson; Peter Westervelt; Matthew J Walter; Timothy A Graubert; John F DiPersio; Li Ding; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Clinical effect of point mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Rafael Bejar; Kristen Stevenson; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Naomi Galili; Björn Nilsson; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Hagop Kantarjian; Azra Raza; Ross L Levine; Donna Neuberg; Benjamin L Ebert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Somatic mutations predict poor outcome in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation.

Authors:  Rafael Bejar; Kristen E Stevenson; Bennett Caughey; R Coleman Lindsley; Brenton G Mar; Petar Stojanov; Gad Getz; David P Steensma; Jerome Ritz; Robert Soiffer; Joseph H Antin; Edwin Alyea; Philippe Armand; Vincent Ho; John Koreth; Donna Neuberg; Corey S Cutler; Benjamin L Ebert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Comparable outcomes after nonmyeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation with unrelated and related donors.

Authors:  Marco Mielcarek; Barry E Storer; Brenda M Sandmaier; Mohamed L Sorror; David G Maloney; Effie Petersdorf; Paul J Martin; Rainer Storb
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: a clinical and morphologic study of 65 cases.

Authors:  S D Michels; R W McKenna; D C Arthur; R D Brunning
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  New insights into the prognostic impact of the karyotype in MDS and correlation with subtypes: evidence from a core dataset of 2124 patients.

Authors:  Detlef Haase; Ulrich Germing; Julie Schanz; Michael Pfeilstöcker; Thomas Nösslinger; Barbara Hildebrandt; Andrea Kundgen; Michael Lübbert; Regina Kunzmann; Aristoteles A N Giagounidis; Carlo Aul; Lorenz Trümper; Otto Krieger; Reinhard Stauder; Thomas H Müller; Friedrich Wimazal; Peter Valent; Christa Fonatsch; Christian Steidl
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  IPSS poor-risk karyotype as a predictor of outcome for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome following myeloablative stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Thomas J Nevill; John D Shepherd; Heather J Sutherland; Yasser R Abou Mourad; Julye C Lavoie; Michael J Barnett; Stephen H Nantel; Cynthia L Toze; Donna E Hogge; Donna L Forrest; Kevin W Song; Maryse M Power; Janet Y Nitta; Yunfeng Dai; Clayton A Smith
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Detection of minimal residual disease in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia by next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Stephen J Salipante; Jonathan R Fromm; Jay Shendure; Brent L Wood; David Wu
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 7.842

View more
  9 in total

1.  Machine Learning to Predict Risk of Relapse Using Cytologic Image Markers in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Posthematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Sara Arabyarmohammadi; Patrick Leo; Vidya Sankar Viswanathan; Andrew Janowczyk; German Corredor; Pingfu Fu; Howard Meyerson; Leland Metheny; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2022-05

2.  Jumping translocations in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Cecilia C S Yeung; H Joachim Deeg; Colin Pritchard; David Wu; Min Fang
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2016-08-08

Review 3.  Biology of Disease Relapse in Myeloid Disease: Implication for Strategies to Prevent and Treat Disease Relapse After Stem-Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Joseph C Rimando; Matthew J Christopher; Michael P Rettig; John F DiPersio
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Impending relapse of myelodysplastic syndrome after allogeneic transplant is difficult to diagnose and requires a multi-modal approach.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Courville; Megan Griffith; Celalettin Ustun; Sophia Yohe; Erica Warlick
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2017-12-28

5.  The Wilms' tumor gene-1 is a prognostic factor in myelodysplastic syndrome: a meta analysis.

Authors:  Yanan Jiang; Lin Liu; Jinhuan Wang; Zeng Cao; Zhigang Zhao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-27

6.  Haploidentical related donor vs matched sibling donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome aged over 50 years: A single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Jiafu Huang; Fen Huang; Zhiping Fan; Na Xu; Li Xuan; Hui Liu; Pengcheng Shi; Ling Jiang; Yu Zhang; Jing Sun; Qifa Liu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 7.  The Genomics of Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Origins of Disease Evolution, Biological Pathways, and Prognostic Implications.

Authors:  Hassan Awada; Bicky Thapa; Valeria Visconte
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 6.600

8.  Differential effects of donor lymphocyte infusion upon treatment response and GVHD according to relapse level and donor sources in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Silvia Park; Tong Yoon Kim; Jong Hyuk Lee; Joon Yeop Lee; Gi June Min; Sung Soo Park; Seung-Ah Yahng; Seung-Hwan Shin; Jae-Ho Yoon; Sung-Eun Lee; Byung Sik Cho; Ki-Seong Eom; Seok Lee; Hee-Je Kim; Chang-Ki Min; Jong Wook Lee; Yoo-Jin Kim
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2021-09-23

9.  Neurodevelopmental phenotypes in individuals with pathogenic variants in CHAMP1.

Authors:  Madison Garrity; Haluk Kavus; Marta Rojas-Vasquez; Irene Valenzuela; Austin Larson; Sara Reed; Gary Bellus; Cyril Mignot; Arnold Munnich; Bertrand Isidor; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud       Date:  2021-08-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.