Literature DB >> 19167680

IPSS poor-risk karyotype as a predictor of outcome for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome following myeloablative stem cell transplantation.

Thomas J Nevill1, John D Shepherd, Heather J Sutherland, Yasser R Abou Mourad, Julye C Lavoie, Michael J Barnett, Stephen H Nantel, Cynthia L Toze, Donna E Hogge, Donna L Forrest, Kevin W Song, Maryse M Power, Janet Y Nitta, Yunfeng Dai, Clayton A Smith.   

Abstract

The optimal therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is allogeneic bone marrow (BM) or blood (BSC) stem cell transplantation (SCT), although outcomes are limited by nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and relapse. A retrospective review was performed of 156 patients who underwent SCT (114 BM, 42 BSC) for MDS or secondary acute myelogenous leukemia (sAML) at our institution. Fifty-five patients remain in continuous complete remission: 35 BM recipients and 20 BSC recipients (median follow-up 139 and 89 months, respectively). Estimated 7-year event-free survival (EFS), NRM, and risk of relapse (ROR) are 33% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 25%-43%), 42% (CI 33%-51%), and 25% (CI 17%-33%) for the BM cohort and 45% (CI 32%-64%, P= .07), 32% (CI 18%-47%, P= .15), and 23% (CI 11%-37%, P= .79) for the BSC cohort. Multivariate analysis showed IPSS poor-risk cytogenetics (P< .001), time from diagnosis to SCT (P< .001), FAB subgroup (P= .001), recipients not in complete remission (CR1) at SCT (P= .005), and the development of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (P= .04) were all predictive of an inferior EFS. The FAB subgroup (P= .002), poor-risk karyotype (P= .004), and non-CR1 status also correlated with ROR in multivariate analysis. EFS for poor-risk karyotype patients was superior after receiving BSC compared to BM (39% versus 6%, P< .001). SCT outcomes in MDS/sAML are strongly associated with the IPSS cytogenetic risk group, although the use of BSC in poor-risk karyotype patients may lead to a more favorable long-term EFS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19167680     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  8 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up of a retrospective comparison of reduced-intensity conditioning and conventional high-dose conditioning for allogeneic transplantation from matched related donors in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  R Martino; A Henseler; M van Lint; N Schaap; J Finke; D Beelen; S Vigouroux; E P Alessandrino; G J Mufti; J H Veelken; B Bruno; I Yakoub-Agha; L Volin; J Maertens; R Or; V Leblond; M Rovira; P Kalhs; A F Alvarez; A Vitek; J Sierra; E Wagner; M Robin; T de Witte; N Kröger
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  Monosomal karyotype at the time of diagnosis or transplantation predicts outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Celalettin Ustun; Bryan J Trottier; Zohar Sachs; Todd E DeFor; Leyla Shune; Elizabeth L Courville; Shernan G Holtan; Michelle Dolan; Daniel J Weisdorf; Erica D Warlick
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Specific abnormalities versus number of abnormalities and cytogenetic scoring systems for outcome prediction after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT for myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  C Kelaidi; I Tzannou; I Baltadakis; I Batsis; D Mallouri; A Spyridonidis; S Gigantes; P Tsirigotis; I Apostolidis; A Athanasiadou; K Manola; A Anagnostopoulos; N Harhalakis; I Sakellari; D Karakasis
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  Reduced-intensity and myeloablative conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Wen Zeng; Lifang Huang; Fankai Meng; Zeming Liu; Jianfeng Zhou; Hanying Sun
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-11-15

5.  Five-group cytogenetic risk classification, monosomal karyotype, and outcome after hematopoietic cell transplantation for MDS or acute leukemia evolving from MDS.

Authors:  H Joachim Deeg; Bart L Scott; Min Fang; Howard M Shulman; Boglarka Gyurkocza; David Myerson; John M Pagel; Uwe Platzbecker; Aravind Ramakrishnan; Jerald P Radich; Brenda M Sandmaier; Mohamed Sorror; Derek L Stirewalt; Wendy A Wilson; Rainer Storb; Frederick R Appelbaum; Ted Gooley
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Analysis of Late Relapse Using Comparative Karyotype and Chromosome Genome Array Testing.

Authors:  Cecilia C S Yeung; Aaron T Gerds; Min Fang; Bart L Scott; Mary E D Flowers; Ted Gooley; H Joachim Deeg
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Anti-CD117 antibody depletes normal and myelodysplastic syndrome human hematopoietic stem cells in xenografted mice.

Authors:  Wendy W Pang; Agnieszka Czechowicz; Aaron C Logan; Rashmi Bhardwaj; Jessica Poyser; Christopher Y Park; Irving L Weissman; Judith A Shizuru
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 25.476

8.  Impact of the International Prognostic Scoring System cytogenetic risk groups on the outcome of patients with primary myelodysplastic syndromes undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation from human leukocyte antigen-identical siblings: a retrospective analysis of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation-Chronic Malignancies Working Party.

Authors:  Francesco Onida; Ronald Brand; Anja van Biezen; Michel Schaap; Peter A von dem Borne; Johan Maertens; Dietrich W Beelen; Enric Carreras; Emilio P Alessandrino; Liisa Volin; Jürgen H E Kuball; Angela Figuera; Jorge Sierra; Jürgen Finke; Nicolaus Kröger; Theo de Witte
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 9.941

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.