Literature DB >> 25953383

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Use of a Constrained Condylar Knee Prosthesis.

Young-Hoo Kim1, Jang-Won Park1, Jun-Shik Kim1, Hyun-Keun Oh1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine long-term clinical and radiographic results. One hundred and ninety-four patients (228 knees) underwent revision TKA with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis. The mean duration of follow-up was 14.6 years (range, 11 to 16 years). The mean pre-revision Knee Society knee scores (43.5 points) and function scores (47.0 points), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index scores (88 points) were improved significantly (P=0.002) to 85.6, 68.5, and 25 points, respectively, at 14.6 years follow-up. Eighteen knees (8%) had re-revision. Four knees were re-revised for infection. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis revealed that the 16-year rate of survival of the components was 94.7% as the end point of loosening and 92% as the end point of revision.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical outcomes; constrained condylar knee prosthesis; radiographic outcomes; revision; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25953383     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

1.  Good clinical and radiological outcomes of the varus-valgus constrained mobile-bearing implant in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ron Gurel; Samuel Morgan; Etay Elbaz; Nimrod Snir; Aviram Gold; Yaniv Warschawski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Factors affecting the choice of constrained prostheses when performing revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Cheol Hee Park; Jung Kwon Bae; Sang Jun Song
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Infection and periprosthetic fracture are the leading causes of failure after aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Juliette A Meyer; Mark Zhu; Alana Cavadino; Brendan Coleman; Jacob T Munro; Simon W Young
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  No Differences in Outcomes Scores or Survivorship of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Between Patients Younger or Older than 55 Years of Age at Minimum 10-Year Followup.

Authors:  Merrill Lee; Jerry Chen; Chia Shi Lu; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Hybrid Cementation Technique Using the New Modular System for Aseptic Knee Arthroplasty Revision Surgery.

Authors:  Alessio Biazzo; Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Eric Staals; Francesco Masia; Francesco Verde
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-05

6.  Mid-term outcomes of primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty for severe knee deformity.

Authors:  Xiao-Bo Feng; Cao Yang; De-Hao Fu; Shu-Nan Ye; Xian-Zhe Liu; Zhe Chen; Saroj Rai; Shu-Hua Yang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-13

7.  Management of periprosthetic fractures of knee arthroplasty with revision surgery.

Authors:  Ahmad Kamal; Ren Jiang Dong; Rafiq Shah; Cao Li
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-01

Review 8.  Patient-reported outcome measures following revision knee replacement: a review of PROM instrument utilisation and measurement properties using the COSMIN checklist.

Authors:  Shiraz A Sabah; Elizabeth A Hedge; Simon G F Abram; Abtin Alvand; Andrew J Price; Sally Hopewell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.