Vincent Alvarez1,2,3, Frank W Drislane2, M Brandon Westover3, Barbara A Dworetzky1, Jong Woo Lee1. 1. Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A. 2. Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A. 3. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) is important for treatment guidance in status epilepticus (SE) management, but its role in clinical outcome prediction is unclear. Our aim is to determine which cEEG features give independent outcome information after correction for clinical predictor. METHODS: cEEG data of 120 consecutive adult patients with SE were prospectively collected in three academic medical centers using the 2012 American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology. Association between cEEG features and two clinical outcome measures (mortality and complete recovery) was assessed. RESULTS: In the first 24 h of EEG recording, 49 patients (40.8%) showed no periodic or rhythmic pattern, 45 (37.5%) had periodic discharges, 20 (16.7%) had rhythmic delta activity, and 6 (5%) had spike-and-wave discharges. Seizures were recorded in 68.3% of patients. After adjusting for known clinical predictive factors for mortality including the STatus Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS) and the presence of a potentially fatal etiology, the only EEG features (among rhythmic and periodic patterns, seizures, and background activity) that remained significantly associated with outcome were the absence of a posterior dominant rhythm (odds ratio [OR] 9.8; p = 0.033) for mortality and changes in stage II sleep pattern characteristics (OR 2.59 for each step up among these categories: absent, present and abnormal, present and normal; p = 0.002) for complete recovery. SIGNIFICANCE: After adjustment for relevant clinical findings, including SE severity and etiology, cEEG background information (posterior dominant rhythm and sleep patterns) is more predictive for clinical outcome after SE than are rhythmic and periodic patterns or seizures. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
OBJECTIVE: Continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) is important for treatment guidance in status epilepticus (SE) management, but its role in clinical outcome prediction is unclear. Our aim is to determine which cEEG features give independent outcome information after correction for clinical predictor. METHODS:cEEG data of 120 consecutive adult patients with SE were prospectively collected in three academic medical centers using the 2012 American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology. Association between cEEG features and two clinical outcome measures (mortality and complete recovery) was assessed. RESULTS: In the first 24 h of EEG recording, 49 patients (40.8%) showed no periodic or rhythmic pattern, 45 (37.5%) had periodic discharges, 20 (16.7%) had rhythmic delta activity, and 6 (5%) had spike-and-wave discharges. Seizures were recorded in 68.3% of patients. After adjusting for known clinical predictive factors for mortality including the STatus Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS) and the presence of a potentially fatal etiology, the only EEG features (among rhythmic and periodic patterns, seizures, and background activity) that remained significantly associated with outcome were the absence of a posterior dominant rhythm (odds ratio [OR] 9.8; p = 0.033) for mortality and changes in stage II sleep pattern characteristics (OR 2.59 for each step up among these categories: absent, present and abnormal, present and normal; p = 0.002) for complete recovery. SIGNIFICANCE: After adjustment for relevant clinical findings, including SE severity and etiology, cEEG background information (posterior dominant rhythm and sleep patterns) is more predictive for clinical outcome after SE than are rhythmic and periodic patterns or seizures. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors: Peter B Forgacs; Mary M Conte; Esteban A Fridman; Henning U Voss; Jonathan D Victor; Nicholas D Schiff Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2014-10-24 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Brandon Foreman; Jan Claassen; Karine Abou Khaled; Jeffrey Jirsch; Daniel M Alschuler; John Wittman; Ronald G Emerson; Lawrence J Hirsch Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Nicolas Gaspard; Lawrence J Hirsch; Suzette M LaRoche; Cecil D Hahn; M Brandon Westover Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Mallika Purandare; Alexa N Ehlert; Henri Vaitkevicius; Barbara A Dworetzky; Jong Woo Lee Journal: Seizure Date: 2018-08-15 Impact factor: 3.184
Authors: Melissa P Knauert; Emily J Gilmore; Terrence E Murphy; Henry K Yaggi; Peter H Van Ness; Ling Han; Lawrence J Hirsch; Margaret A Pisani Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2018-08-23 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Paola Vassallo; Jan Novy; Frédéric Zubler; Kaspar Schindler; Vincent Alvarez; Stephan Rüegg; Andrea O Rossetti Journal: Acta Neurol Scand Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 3.915