OBJECTIVE: The interpretation of critical care electroencephalography (EEG) studies is challenging because of the presence of many periodic and rhythmic patterns of uncertain clinical significance. Defining the clinical significance of these patterns requires standardized terminology with high interrater agreement (IRA). We sought to evaluate IRA for the final, published American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS)-approved version of the critical care EEG terminology (2012 version). Our evaluation included terms not assessed previously and incorporated raters with a broad range of EEG reading experience. METHODS: After reviewing a set of training slides, 49 readers independently completed a Web-based test consisting of 11 identical questions for each of 37 EEG samples (407 questions). Questions assessed whether a pattern was an electrographic seizure; pattern location (main term 1), pattern type (main term 2); and presence and classification of eight other key features ("plus" modifiers, sharpness, absolute and relative amplitude, frequency, number of phases, fluctuation/evolution, and the presence of "triphasic" morphology). RESULTS: IRA statistics (κ values) were almost perfect (90-100%) for seizures, main terms 1 and 2, the +S modifier (superimposed spikes/sharp waves or sharply contoured rhythmic delta activity), sharpness, absolute amplitude, frequency, and number of phases. Agreement was substantial for the +F (superimposed fast activity) and +R (superimposed rhythmic delta activity) modifiers (66% and 67%, respectively), moderate for triphasic morphology (58%), and fair for evolution (21%). SIGNIFICANCE: IRA for most terms in the ACNS critical care EEG terminology is high. These terms are suitable for multicenter research on the clinical significance of critical care EEG patterns. A PowerPoint slide summarizing this article is available for download in the Supporting Information section http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.12653/supinfo. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
OBJECTIVE: The interpretation of critical care electroencephalography (EEG) studies is challenging because of the presence of many periodic and rhythmic patterns of uncertain clinical significance. Defining the clinical significance of these patterns requires standardized terminology with high interrater agreement (IRA). We sought to evaluate IRA for the final, published American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS)-approved version of the critical care EEG terminology (2012 version). Our evaluation included terms not assessed previously and incorporated raters with a broad range of EEG reading experience. METHODS: After reviewing a set of training slides, 49 readers independently completed a Web-based test consisting of 11 identical questions for each of 37 EEG samples (407 questions). Questions assessed whether a pattern was an electrographic seizure; pattern location (main term 1), pattern type (main term 2); and presence and classification of eight other key features ("plus" modifiers, sharpness, absolute and relative amplitude, frequency, number of phases, fluctuation/evolution, and the presence of "triphasic" morphology). RESULTS: IRA statistics (κ values) were almost perfect (90-100%) for seizures, main terms 1 and 2, the +S modifier (superimposed spikes/sharp waves or sharply contoured rhythmic delta activity), sharpness, absolute amplitude, frequency, and number of phases. Agreement was substantial for the +F (superimposed fast activity) and +R (superimposed rhythmic delta activity) modifiers (66% and 67%, respectively), moderate for triphasic morphology (58%), and fair for evolution (21%). SIGNIFICANCE: IRA for most terms in the ACNS critical care EEG terminology is high. These terms are suitable for multicenter research on the clinical significance of critical care EEG patterns. A PowerPoint slide summarizing this article is available for download in the Supporting Information section http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.12653/supinfo. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors: Lawrence J Hirsch; Richard P Brenner; Frank W Drislane; Elson So; Peter W Kaplan; Kenneth G Jordan; Susan T Herman; Suzette M LaRoche; Bryan Young; Thomas P Bleck; Mark L Scheuer; Ronald G Emerson Journal: J Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.177
Authors: Jan Claassen; Fabio S Taccone; Peter Horn; Martin Holtkamp; Nino Stocchetti; Mauro Oddo Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: L J Hirsch; S M LaRoche; N Gaspard; E Gerard; A Svoronos; S T Herman; R Mani; H Arif; N Jette; Y Minazad; J F Kerrigan; P Vespa; S Hantus; J Claassen; G B Young; E So; P W Kaplan; M R Nuwer; N B Fountain; F W Drislane Journal: J Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 2.177
Authors: Brandon Foreman; Jan Claassen; Karine Abou Khaled; Jeffrey Jirsch; Daniel M Alschuler; John Wittman; Ronald G Emerson; Lawrence J Hirsch Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Paula A Gerber; Kevin E Chapman; Steve S Chung; Cornelia Drees; Rama K Maganti; Yu-Tze Ng; David M Treiman; Andrew S Little; John F Kerrigan Journal: J Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 2.177
Authors: Mathilde C Hermans; M Brandon Westover; Michel J A M van Putten; Lawrence J Hirsch; Nicolas Gaspard Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Sahar F Zafar; Edilberto Amorim; Craig A Williamsom; Jin Jing; Emily J Gilmore; Hiba A Haider; Christa Swisher; Aaron Struck; Eric S Rosenthal; Marcus Ng; Sarah Schmitt; Jong W Lee; M Brandon Westover Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Carla Bentes; Hugo Martins; Ana Rita Peralta; Carlos Casimiro; Carlos Morgado; Ana Catarina Franco; Ana Catarina Fonseca; Ruth Geraldes; Patrícia Canhão; Teresa Pinho E Melo; Teresa Paiva; José M Ferro Journal: J Neurol Date: 2017-08-14 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Mallika Purandare; Alexa N Ehlert; Henri Vaitkevicius; Barbara A Dworetzky; Jong Woo Lee Journal: Seizure Date: 2018-08-15 Impact factor: 3.184
Authors: Susan T Herman; Nicholas S Abend; Thomas P Bleck; Kevin E Chapman; Frank W Drislane; Ronald G Emerson; Elizabeth E Gerard; Cecil D Hahn; Aatif M Husain; Peter W Kaplan; Suzette M LaRoche; Marc R Nuwer; Mark Quigg; James J Riviello; Sarah E Schmitt; Liberty A Simmons; Tammy N Tsuchida; Lawrence J Hirsch Journal: J Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 2.177
Authors: Hiba A Haider; Rosana Esteller; Cecil D Hahn; M Brandon Westover; Jonathan J Halford; Jong W Lee; Mouhsin M Shafi; Nicolas Gaspard; Susan T Herman; Elizabeth E Gerard; Lawrence J Hirsch; Joshua A Ehrenberg; Suzette M LaRoche Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 9.910