M Lamuraglia1, S Raslan2, R Elaidi3, S Oudard3, B Escudier4, K Slimane5, R Renard Penna2, M Wagner2, O Lucidarme6,7. 1. Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, F-75013, Paris, France. 2. Service de Radiologie Polyvalente et Oncologique, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP UPMC, 47-83, Bd de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France. 3. Oncology Unit, Georges-Pompidou Hospital, APHP, Paris, France. 4. Medical Oncology Department, Gustave-Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France. 5. Novartis Pharma, Rueil-Malmaison, France. 6. Service de Radiologie Polyvalente et Oncologique, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP UPMC, 47-83, Bd de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France. olivier.lucidarme@psl.aphp.fr. 7. Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, F-75013, Paris, France. olivier.lucidarme@psl.aphp.fr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether 2D or 3D Choi and modified Choi (mChoi) criteria could assess the efficacy of everolimus against metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: RECIST-1.1, Choi, and mChoi criteria were applied retrospectively to analyse baseline and 2-month contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images in 48 patients with mRCC enrolled in theeverolimus arm of the French randomized double-blind multicentre phase III trial comparing everolimus versus placebo (RECORD-1). The primary endpoint was centrally reviewed progression-free survival (PFS) calculated from the initial RECORD-1 analysis. Mean attenuation was determined for 2D target lesion regions of interest drawn on CECT sections whose largest diameters had been measured, and for the 3D whole target lesion. RESULTS: The median PFS was 5.5 months. The median PFS for everolimus responders defined using 3D mChoi criteria was significantly longer than for non-responders (7.6 versus 5.4 months, respectively), corresponding to a hazard ratio for progression of 0.45 (95 % CI: 0.22-0.92), with respective 1-year survival rates of 31 % and 9 %. No other 2D or 3D imaging criteria at 2 months identified patients who would benefit from everolimus. CONCLUSIONS: At 2 months, only 3D mChoi criteria were able to identify mRCC patients with a PFS benefit from everolimus. KEY POINTS: Choi criteria could not identify everolimus-treated patients with significantly prolonged PFS. mCHOI enabled identification of everolimus-treated mRCC patients with a PFS benefit. 3D attenuation measurement criteria appeared to perform better than single-slice measurement.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To determine whether 2D or 3D Choi and modified Choi (mChoi) criteria could assess the efficacy of everolimus against metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: RECIST-1.1, Choi, and mChoi criteria were applied retrospectively to analyse baseline and 2-month contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images in 48 patients with mRCC enrolled in the everolimus arm of the French randomized double-blind multicentre phase III trial comparing everolimus versus placebo (RECORD-1). The primary endpoint was centrally reviewed progression-free survival (PFS) calculated from the initial RECORD-1 analysis. Mean attenuation was determined for 2D target lesion regions of interest drawn on CECT sections whose largest diameters had been measured, and for the 3D whole target lesion. RESULTS: The median PFS was 5.5 months. The median PFS for everolimus responders defined using 3D mChoi criteria was significantly longer than for non-responders (7.6 versus 5.4 months, respectively), corresponding to a hazard ratio for progression of 0.45 (95 % CI: 0.22-0.92), with respective 1-year survival rates of 31 % and 9 %. No other 2D or 3D imaging criteria at 2 months identified patients who would benefit from everolimus. CONCLUSIONS: At 2 months, only 3D mChoi criteria were able to identify mRCC patients with a PFS benefit from everolimus. KEY POINTS: Choi criteria could not identify everolimus-treated patients with significantly prolonged PFS. mCHOI enabled identification of everolimus-treated mRCC patients with a PFS benefit. 3D attenuation measurement criteria appeared to perform better than single-slice measurement.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Andrew Dennis Smith; Shetal N Shah; Brian I Rini; Michael L Lieber; Erick M Remer Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Katherine M Krajewski; Yoko Franchetti; Mizuki Nishino; André P Fay; Nikhil Ramaiya; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Toni K Choueiri Journal: Oncologist Date: 2014-04-22
Authors: Stéphane Oudard; Rokhaya Thiam; Laure S Fournier; Jacques Medioni; Michele Lamuraglia; Florian Scotte; Elizabeth Fabre; Dennis Kim; Euloge Kpamegan; Ashok Panneerselvam; Charles A Cuenod Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Silvia Stacchiotti; Paolo Verderio; Antonella Messina; Carlo Morosi; Paola Collini; Antonio Llombart-Bosch; Javier Martin; Alessandro Comandone; Jurado Cruz; Andrea Ferraro; Giovanni Grignani; Sara Pizzamiglio; Vittorio Quagliuolo; Piero Picci; Sergio Frustaci; Angelo Paolo Dei Tos; Paolo G Casali; Alessandro Gronchi Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Bernard Escudier; Stephane Oudard; Thomas E Hutson; Camillo Porta; Sergio Bracarda; Viktor Grünwald; John A Thompson; Robert A Figlin; Norbert Hollaender; Andrea Kay; Alain Ravaud Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Katherine M Krajewski; Mengye Guo; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Jeffrey Yap; Nikhil Ramaiya; Jyothi Jagannathan; Daniel Y C Heng; Michael B Atkins; David F McDermott; Fabio A B Schutz; Ivan Pedrosa; Toni K Choueiri Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Neema Jamshidi; Eric Jonasch; Matthew Zapala; Ronald L Korn; James D Brooks; Borje Ljungberg; Michael D Kuo Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-11-11 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Katherine M Krajewski; Marta Braschi-Amirfarzan; Pamela J DiPiro; Jyothi P Jagannathan; Atul B Shinagare Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2017-01-05 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Michael Esser; Cristopher Kloth; Wolfgang M Thaiss; Christian P Reinert; Mareen S Kraus; Gabriel Cc Gast; Marius Horger Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 3.039