Fiona Crawford-Williams1, Mary Steen2, Adrian Esterman2, Andrea Fielder2, Antonina Mikocka-Walus3. 1. School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of South Australia, Frome Road, Adelaide, SA, Australia. Electronic address: crafm002@mymail.unisa.edu.au. 2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of South Australia, Frome Road, Adelaide, SA, Australia. 3. School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of South Australia, Frome Road, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alcohol consumption during pregnancy has the potential to cause significant harm to the foetus and the current Australian guidelines state that it is safest not to drink alcohol while pregnant. However, conflicting messages often appear in the media and it is unclear if the message to avoid alcohol is being effectively conveyed to pregnant women. AIMS: This research aims to explore the advice that health professionals provide to pregnant women about alcohol consumption; the knowledge of health professionals regarding the effects of alcohol consumption; and their consistency with following the Australian guidelines. METHODS: Ten semi-structured face to face interviews were conducted with health professionals who regularly provide antenatal care. These include midwives, obstetricians, and shared care general practitioners. A six-stage thematic analysis framework was used to analyse the interview data in a systematic way to ensure rigour and transparency. The analysis involved coding data extracts, followed by identifying the major themes. FINDINGS: Health professionals displayed adequate knowledge that alcohol can cause physical and mental difficulties that are lifelong; however, knowledge of the term FASD and the broad spectrum of difficulties associated with alcohol consumption during pregnancy was limited. Although health professionals were willing to discuss alcohol with pregnant women, many did not make this a routine part of practice, and several concerning judgements were noted. CONCLUSION: Communication between health professionals and pregnant women needs to be improved to ensure that accurate information about alcohol use in pregnancy is being provided. Further, it is important to ensure that the national guidelines are being supported by health professionals.
BACKGROUND:Alcohol consumption during pregnancy has the potential to cause significant harm to the foetus and the current Australian guidelines state that it is safest not to drink alcohol while pregnant. However, conflicting messages often appear in the media and it is unclear if the message to avoid alcohol is being effectively conveyed to pregnant women. AIMS: This research aims to explore the advice that health professionals provide to pregnant women about alcohol consumption; the knowledge of health professionals regarding the effects of alcohol consumption; and their consistency with following the Australian guidelines. METHODS: Ten semi-structured face to face interviews were conducted with health professionals who regularly provide antenatal care. These include midwives, obstetricians, and shared care general practitioners. A six-stage thematic analysis framework was used to analyse the interview data in a systematic way to ensure rigour and transparency. The analysis involved coding data extracts, followed by identifying the major themes. FINDINGS: Health professionals displayed adequate knowledge that alcohol can cause physical and mental difficulties that are lifelong; however, knowledge of the term FASD and the broad spectrum of difficulties associated with alcohol consumption during pregnancy was limited. Although health professionals were willing to discuss alcohol with pregnant women, many did not make this a routine part of practice, and several concerning judgements were noted. CONCLUSION: Communication between health professionals and pregnant women needs to be improved to ensure that accurate information about alcohol use in pregnancy is being provided. Further, it is important to ensure that the national guidelines are being supported by health professionals.
Authors: Melanie Kingsland; Emma Doherty; Amy E Anderson; Kristy Crooks; Belinda Tully; Danika Tremain; Tracey W Tsang; John Attia; Luke Wolfenden; Adrian J Dunlop; Nicole Bennett; Mandy Hunter; Sarah Ward; Penny Reeves; Ian Symonds; Chris Rissel; Carol Azzopardi; Andrew Searles; Karen Gillham; Elizabeth J Elliott; John Wiggers Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2018-08-20 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Helen Howlett; Shonag Mackenzie; Eugen-Matthias Strehle; Judith Rankin; William K Gray Journal: Clin Med Insights Reprod Health Date: 2019-03-27
Authors: Emma Doherty; John Wiggers; Luke Wolfenden; Amy E Anderson; Kristy Crooks; Tracey W Tsang; Elizabeth J Elliott; Adrian J Dunlop; John Attia; Julia Dray; Belinda Tully; Nicole Bennett; Henry Murray; Carol Azzopardi; Melanie Kingsland Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2019-08-16 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Leigh Tenkku Lepper; Diane King; Joy Doll; Sandra Gonzalez; Ann Mitchell; Joyce Hartje Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-05-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: J Dray; M Licata; E Doherty; B Tully; B Williams; S Curtin; D White; C Lecathelinais; S Ward; S Hasson; E J Elliott; J Wiggers; M Kingsland Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-03-26 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Emma Doherty; Melanie Kingsland; Luke Wolfenden; John Wiggers; Julia Dray; Jenna Hollis; Elizabeth J Elliott; Justine B Daly; Kylie A Bailey; John Attia; Mandy Hunter; Ian Symonds; Belinda Tully; Danika Tremain; Rebecca K Hodder Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2019-11-23