Literature DB >> 25952091

Rate of duodenal-biliary reflux increases in patients with recurrent common bile duct stones: evidence from barium meal examination.

Rongchun Zhang1, Hui Luo2, Yanglin Pan2, Lina Zhao3, Junqiang Dong4, Zhiguo Liu2, Xiangping Wang2, Qin Tao2, Guohua Lu5, Xuegang Guo2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stone recurrence is a common late adverse event after ERCP in patients with common bile duct stones (CBDS). Duodenal-biliary reflux (DBR) is considered a major cause of CBDS recurrence. However, specific evidence is still lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the DBR rate in patients with recurrent CBDS after ERCP.
DESIGN: A prospective case-control study.
SETTING: A tertiary center. PATIENTS: During follow-up, patients with a history of either recurrent CBDS (recurrence group) or nonrecurrent CBDS (control group) were invited to participate in the study. All patients had previously undergone successful CBDS removal by ERCP. Patients in the control group were matched with the recurrence group by age and gender in a 1:1 ratio. Patients with gallbladder stones, hepatolithiasis, remnant CBDS, CBD strictures, or stents were excluded.
INTERVENTIONS: Standard barium meal examination, MRCP, and enhanced abdominal CT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: DBR.
RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with a history of recurrent CBDS and 32 matched control subjects were enrolled. Baseline characteristics and parameters regarding the first ERCP were comparable between the 2 groups. The DBR rate was significantly higher in the recurrent than in the control group (68.8% vs 15.6%, P < .001). Multivariate analysis indicated that DBR (OR, 9.59; 95% CI, 2.65-34.76) and acute distal CBD angulation (OR, 5.48; 95% CI, 1.52-19.78) were independent factors associated with CBDS recurrence. DBR rates in patients with no, single, or multiple recurrences were 15.6%, 60.9%, and 88.9%, respectively (P < .001). Intrahepatic bile duct reflux was more common in patients with multiple recurrences. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size.
CONCLUSIONS: DBR is correlated with CBDS recurrence in patients who had previously undergone ERCP. DBR and acute distal CBD angulation are 2 independent risk factors related to stone recurrence. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02329977.)
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25952091     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  16 in total

1.  Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Taifeng Zhu; Haoming Lin; Jian Sun; Chao Liu; Rui Zhang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Predictors for stone recurrence after a successful common bile duct surgical exploration for choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Paula Gonzálvez-Guardiola; Carmen Payá-Llorente; Carlos Domingo-Del Pozo; Aleix Martínez-Pérez
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Biliary Microbiota in Choledocholithiasis and Correlation With Duodenal Microbiota.

Authors:  Jinyan Han; Shuodong Wu; Ying Fan; Yu Tian; Jing Kong
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 5.293

4.  Recurrence of choledocholithiasis following endoscopic bile duct clearance: Long term results and factors associated with recurrent bile duct stones.

Authors:  Christos Konstantakis; Christos Triantos; Vasileios Theopistos; Georgios Theocharis; Ioannis Maroulis; Georgia Diamantopoulou; Konstantinos Thomopoulos
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-01-16

5.  T-Tube Use After Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration.

Authors:  Cuinan Jiang; Xiuhao Zhao; Shi Cheng
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Self-expandable metallic stent placement above the papilla without endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Ryoji Takada; Kenji Ikezawa; Ryosuke Kiyota; Toshihiro Imai; Yutaro Abe; Nobuyasu Fukutake; Reiko Ashida; Takatoshi Nawa; Takahiro Tabuchi; Kazuhiro Katayama; Kazuyoshi Ohkawa
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-05-25

7.  Comparison on the Efficacy of Three Duct Closure Methods after Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Ancheng Qin; Jianwu Wu; Zhiming Qiao; Min Zhai; Yijie Lu; Bo Huang; Xinwei Jiang; Xingsheng Lu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-12-20

8.  Alterations of the Bile Microbiome in Recurrent Common Bile Duct Stone.

Authors:  Cheng Ye; Wence Zhou; Hui Zhang; Long Miao; Gen Lv
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Advances in Risk Factors for Recurrence of Common Bile Duct Stones.

Authors:  Yao Wu; Chen Jing Xu; Shun Fu Xu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Outcomes of endoscopic sphincterotomy vs open choledochotomy for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Zhou; Qiao-Feng Chen; Yuan-Yuan Zhang; Ming-Ju Yu; Chang Zhong; Zhi-Jian Liu; Guo-Hua Li; Xiao-Jiang Zhou; Jun-Bo Hong; You-Xiang Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.