Literature DB >> 25951915

Clinical impact of quantitative left atrial vortex flow analysis in patients with atrial fibrillation: a comparison with invasive left atrial voltage mapping.

Jung Myung Lee1, Geu-Ru Hong, Hui-Nam Pak, Chi Young Shim, Helene Houle, Mani A Vannan, Minji Kim, Namsik Chung.   

Abstract

Recently, left atrial (LA) vortex flow analysis using contrast transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been shown to be feasible and has demonstrated significant differences in vortex flow morphology and pulsatility between normal subjects and patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the relationship between LA vortex flow and electrophysiological properties and the clinical significance of LA vortex flow are unknown. The aims of this study were (1) to compare LA vortex flow parameters with LA voltage and (2) to assess the predictive value of LA vortex flow parameters for the recurrence of AF after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). Thirty-nine patients with symptomatic non-valvular AF underwent contrast TEE before undergoing RFCA for AF. Quantitative LA vortex flow parameters were analyzed by Omega flow (Siemens Medical Solution, Mountain View, CA, USA). The morphology and pulsatility of LA vortex flow were compared with electrophysiologic parameters that were measured invasively. Hemodynamic, electrophysiological, and vortex flow parameters were compared between patients with and without early recurrence of AF after RFCA. Morphologic parameters, including LA vortex depth, length, width, and sphericity index were not associated with LA voltage or hemodynamic parameters. The relative strength (RS), which represents the pulsatility power of LA, was positively correlated with LA voltage (R = 0.53, p = 0.01) and LA appendage flow velocity (R = 0.73, p < 0.001) and negatively correlated with LA volume index (R = -0.56, p < 0.001). Patients with recurrent AF after RFCA showed significantly lower RS (1.7 ± 0.2 vs 1.9 ± 0.4, p = 0.048) and LA voltage (0.9 ± 0.7 vs 1.7 ± 0.8, p = 0.004) than patients without AF recurrence. In the relatively small LA dimension group (LA volume index ≤ 33 ml/m(2)), RS was significantly lower (2.1 ± 0.3 vs 1.7 ± 0.1, p = 0.029) in patients with the recurrent AF. Quantitative LA vortex flow analysis, especially RS, correlated well with LA voltage. Decreased pulsatility strength in the LA was associated with recurrent AF. LA vortex may have incremental value in predicting the recurrence of AF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25951915     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0671-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  19 in total

1.  Three dimensional flow in the human left atrium.

Authors:  A Fyrenius; L Wigström; T Ebbers; M Karlsson; J Engvall; A F Bolger
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Emerging trends in CV flow visualization.

Authors:  Partho P Sengupta; Gianni Pedrizzetti; Philip J Kilner; Arash Kheradvar; Tino Ebbers; Giovanni Tonti; Alan G Fraser; Jagat Narula
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-03

Review 3.  Predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ethan M Balk; Ann C Garlitski; Alawi A Alsheikh-Ali; Teruhiko Terasawa; Mei Chung; Stanley Ip
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-11

4.  Left atrial voltage during atrial fibrillation in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation patients.

Authors:  Martin Fiala; Dan Wichterle; Jan Chovancík; Veronika Bulková; Dorota Wojnarová; Renáta Nevralová; Jaroslav Januska
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  Comparison of voltage map-guided left atrial anterior wall ablation versus left lateral mitral isthmus ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Hui-Nam Pak; Yong Seog Oh; Hong Euy Lim; Young-Hoon Kim; Chun Hwang
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 6.343

6.  Characterization of the left atrial vortex flow by two-dimensional transesophageal contrast echocardiography using particle image velocimetry.

Authors:  Kyu-Hwan Park; Jang-Won Son; Won-Jong Park; Sang-Hee Lee; Ung Kim; Jong-Seon Park; Dong-Gu Shin; Young-Jo Kim; Jung-Hyun Choi; Helene Houle; Mani A Vannan; Geu-Ru Hong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Characterization and quantification of vortex flow in the human left ventricle by contrast echocardiography using vector particle image velocimetry.

Authors:  Geu-Ru Hong; Gianni Pedrizzetti; Giovanni Tonti; Peng Li; Zhao Wei; Jin Kyung Kim; Abinav Baweja; Shizhen Liu; Namsik Chung; Helene Houle; Jagat Narula; Mani A Vannan
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-11-18

8.  Echocardiographic predictors of nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. The Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  S M Vaziri; M G Larson; E J Benjamin; D Levy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Three methods for evaluation of left atrial volume.

Authors:  Panupong Jiamsripong; Tadaaki Honda; Christina S Reuss; R Todd Hurst; Hari P Chaliki; Diane E Grill; Stephen L Schneck; Rochelle Tyler; Bijoy K Khandheria; Steven J Lester
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2007-07-23

10.  Consistency of complex fractionated atrial electrograms during atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Yenn-Jiang Lin; Ching-Tai Tai; Tsair Kao; Shih-Lin Chang; Wanwarang Wongcharoen; Li-Wei Lo; Ta-Chuan Tuan; Ameya R Udyavar; Yi-Jen Chen; Satoshi Higa; Kuo-Chang Ueng; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 6.343

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Left atrial voltage mapping: defining and targeting the atrial fibrillation substrate.

Authors:  Iain Sim; Martin Bishop; Mark O'Neill; Steven E Williams
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 1.900

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.